rbowman wrote:

>> Name a single thing that Paint.NET does better than Photoshop.
>
> "for what I do" I don't have a need to use either but that is the vital
> question.

Hi rbowman,
You've helped me _many_ (many!) times over on a.h.r, so I will assume
that's a faithful question, where you have to agree first that Alan Baker
is an utter moron.

Alan Baker has an IQ of about 40 (which is my assessment),and hence, he
can't tell the difference between a fact and an assessment of fact.

If you click on none of the links I provide below to back up my assessments
of fact, just click on this one links showing Alan Baker to be an imbecile.
*Why are apologists like Alan Baker so fantastically immune*
*to basics skills an adult should have on the Internet?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/4AdaprOPM-g/>

It's not so much that these iKooks like Alan Baker & Alan Browne are
imbeciles, but that they dispute facts that NOBODY would dispute.

Only a fool disputes facts.
The iKooks are fools.

I've never met people _that_ stupid as these iKooks in my entire life.

You have to think of the iKooks as like this guy, rbowman.
<https://img.yumpu.com/6936343/1/500x640/standouts-the-beat-within.jpg>

They all have the same traits of low iq, no education, & no self esteem.
*Think of iKooks as being low-class IQ 50 thugs with no teeth, no morals &
no education*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/paOrAtV36O4/m/Fl2lcOfpCAAJ>

They're all substandard humans.
Completely unprepossessing meaningless components of society.
No smarter than your pet.

Like your pet, iKooks are incapable of clicking on any reference link.
They only use references to piss on, just like your pet would do.

Their ignorance actually knows no normal bounds, rbowman.
*I just proved, beyond any doubt, how shockingly ignorant the iKooks are
about what Apple does*
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/c/bAazzW5DbZo/m/YmLhfsrvAwAJ>

What he does, all day, every day, 24 hours a day, is take people's
opinions, dispute them, without offing any facts ever, and then he asks
them to prove their opinions.

This is impossible because opinions are based on facts but with different
weights placed on those facts - none of which are eminantly "provable".

That Joel found Paint.NET rather good, and that I've tested _every_ free
app out there for editing that was ever suggested on Windows, says a lot
when I say that Paint.NET is pretty good. Does it not?

Or are you claiming, like Alan Baker does, that everything anyone ever
states (except Alan Baker, of course) is a lie, even as Alan backs up
nothing.

Remember Snit tried that with me?
<https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo> iKooks can't even see the fatal flaw!

Remember nospam and Jolly Roger tried that with me?
*It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength over time*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/PZuec56EWB0>
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0>

If I say a fact is a fact, then it's a fact given in decades of posting on
Usenet nobody has ever found my facts to be wrong (1).

What the idiot iKooks argue endlessly is not only the facts, but the
assessment of those facts (which is why they're idiot iKooks).

For example, this is a fact.
Apple advertised the iPhone 14 comes in a new exciting bold yellow color.
This is another fact.
Apple lists first 21 new emoji when describing the iOS 16.4 release.

Those are just facts, right?
Only a fool would dispute those facts (or an iKook, same as a fool).

You have to understand not a single iKooks has a normal IQ.
When you read this thread, you'll realize Alan Baker's IQ is half normal.

Now, to your question.
Which, by the way, was already answered about half a dozen times already.

I've tested Photoshop for the three key things I care about most
which I have already said are not done well on most image editors

a. Texting
b. Curved arrows
c. Drawing boxes

Most programs do them horribly (e.g., Joel knows this with The GIMP but
even the venerable Irfanview does them poorly, as do most image editors).

The definition of poorly is it takes too many steps for something that
should be a single step, and then another minor step to adjust.

That's it. "Draw & adjust"

No drawing the text box first - that's just stupid.
No expanding that text box if you go out of bounds.
If you want to move it, you just move it.
If you want to change the font in the middle of texting, you change it.
Same with size and all sorts of other text things (like italics or bold).
You draw and then adjust if necessary. One step. Max two.

That's it. "Draw & adjust". Two steps. Max.

Same thing with curved arrows.
You start click and end click and you adjust to curve around stuff.
If you want to make it dotted, you set that while you're doing it.
If you want to change the end shapes while you're doing it, you do that.
If you want to adjust the curve, you move it around while you're doing it.
If you want to change the width or the color (or whatever), you do that.
That's it. "Draw & adjust". Two steps. Max.

Same with boxes around things, such as empty boxes to highlight stuff.
That's it. "Draw & adjust". Two steps. Max.

If you look at my threads, you'll see millions of examples because I don't
make this stuff up. The iKooks make everything up. They're idiots.
<https://i.postimg.cc/tgvzsMRm/scrcpy25.jpg> Connect over Wi-Fi sans USB
<https://i.postimg.cc/9FJMKYch/scrcpy21.jpg> Windows Drive: === Android
<https://i.postimg.cc/g2yNftw0/scrcpy15.jpg> Trick to pin batch shortcut

I'm extremely well educated. None of them can earn a high school diploma.

I back up my claims but there's no way to prove to an iKook like Alan Baker
or Alan Browne that the walled garden doesn't exist when they own an iQ of
40. It's not possible. They think the walled garden never existed.

How are you going to prove anything to anyone who is that stupid?
Especially an assessment of facts when they don't even agree on facts.
Only fools don't agree on facts. All the iKooks are fools.
--
You can't make those ungodly profit margins off an intelligent customer.

On 2023-04-06 15:58, Andy Burnelli wrote:
> rbowman wrote:
>
>>> Name a single thing that Paint.NET does better than Photoshop.
>>
>> "for what I do"   I don't have a need to use either but that is the
>> vital question.
>
> Hi rbowman,
> You've helped me _many_ (many!) times over on a.h.r, so I will assume
> that's a faithful question, where you have to agree first that Alan Baker
> is an utter moron.
>
> Alan Baker has an IQ of about 40 (which is my assessment),and hence, he
> can't tell the difference between a fact and an assessment of fact.

Do you have any idea what the actual capacities of someone with an IQ of
40 would be, Arlen?

Obviously not.