Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Schshschshchsch. -- The Gorn, "Arena", stardate 3046.2

tech / rec.photo.digital / Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?

SubjectAuthor
* Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?Indira
+* Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?Alfred Molon
|`- Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?Peter Jason
`- Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?Paul Carmichael

1
Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?

<usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=15131&group=rec.photo.digital#15131

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: indira@ghandi.net (Indira)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:05:27 +0530
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:35:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3638553"; posting-host="DvTEDjtzpKcsTSj1yXyUvQ.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
Cancel-Lock: sha256:qTiu8KBnDvoc/ZFm+x0b5mInTHzRo/ctg+bynQKdpU0=
Content-Language: en-GB
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
 by: Indira - Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:35 UTC

Why would anyone distribute a photo with EXIF metadata intact?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/11/the-sleeve-the-hand-the-knee-the-royal-photos-telltale-signs-of-editing

"The first step in analysing this image is reading through the file's
embedded metadata to determine the photographic settings of the base camera
image. In this case, we can see that a Canon 50mm f1.2 lens was used for
this initial image, set to an aperture of f3.2, which will give moderately
shallow depth of field.

"This leads me to believe that no one image would have had optimum
sharpness across the required detail areas, so multiple frames were likely
used to composite a more intended final result. Naturally, this also allows
for idealised expressions from all members of the group."

Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?

<65f09382$0$19608$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=15132&group=rec.photo.digital#15132

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!198.186.190.30.MISMATCH!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!us1.netnews.com!eu1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=BLcn]Ghm4nS>gCnG5fMoN\HWonT5<]0T]M9@aW=nh=gZ4fb5@bE@D^X2ag1<^1n6R^lhjl]Vd?URQGfBMFGGUhD_D7=6nMk@;=_K<a5BnWeG[Xd>IGgZBGA\V
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:40:18 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
References: <usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team>
From: alfred.molon@yahoo.com (Alfred Molon)
In-Reply-To: <usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <65f09382$0$19608$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1710265218 reader.netnews.com 19608 127.0.0.1:52443
 by: Alfred Molon - Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:40 UTC

Am 12.03.2024 um 06:35 schrieb Indira:
> "This leads me to believe that no one image would have had optimum
> sharpness across the required detail areas, so multiple frames were likely
> used to composite a more intended final result. Naturally, this also allows
> for idealised expressions from all members of the group."

Why not stop down the lens a bit?
--
Alfred Molon

Olympus micro 4/3 forum at https://groups.io/g/myolympus/
https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site

Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?

<fik1vitv5dt2e2nfvpjfqr7jmnqfuk51kg@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=15133&group=rec.photo.digital#15133

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: pj@jostle.com (Peter Jason)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 09:09:19 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <fik1vitv5dt2e2nfvpjfqr7jmnqfuk51kg@4ax.com>
References: <usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team> <65f09382$0$19608$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8df966d24cc6c18a2c1647353703cb5f";
logging-data="568709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kY1+rmJAo64wOoDWzWG5T"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BpN4U1LMko83QjQZ9A8QjmTeZhI=
 by: Peter Jason - Tue, 12 Mar 2024 22:09 UTC

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 18:40:18 +0100, Alfred Molon
<alfred.molon@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Am 12.03.2024 um 06:35 schrieb Indira:
>> "This leads me to believe that no one image would have had optimum
>> sharpness across the required detail areas, so multiple frames were likely
>> used to composite a more intended final result. Naturally, this also allows
>> for idealised expressions from all members of the group."
>
>Why not stop down the lens a bit?

Don't all modern cameras, and iGadgets have internal editing?

Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?

<pan$98f2$61bcae40$f8c5a92b$32da0c12@gmail.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=15142&group=rec.photo.digital#15142

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: wibbleypants@gmail.com (Paul Carmichael)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: Re: Why Kate Middleton distributed a photo with EXIF data intact?
Date: 16 Mar 2024 15:10:41 GMT
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <pan$98f2$61bcae40$f8c5a92b$32da0c12@gmail.com>
References: <usopiv$3f18p$1@paganini.bofh.team>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net u9xQnkkOyjeI0w1mwlYtEQ1rvv7MC6T2gS/iY8kAZPoZcyhtk=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qL76gsuo3K/GwVjDrfppDVxm87U= sha256:Qargiq0DaXYZreAF6BcdnrKu5hf94IiaEI2c0/iFlX8=
User-Agent: Pan/0.147 (Sweet Solitude; 97d1711 github.com/GNOME/pan.git)
 by: Paul Carmichael - Sat, 16 Mar 2024 15:10 UTC

El Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:05:27 +0530, Indira escribió:

> Why would anyone distribute a photo with EXIF metadata intact?
> https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/11/the-sleeve-the-hand-the-
knee-the-royal-photos-telltale-signs-of-editing
>

Heh. I have seen another version of this photo on an FB group. It was
"differently" modified. No real need to look at the exif data to see that
it's been modified.

--
Paul.

https://paulc.es

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor