Judging from the length of his spams, AP must have the
smallest micro penis on the planet. What a looser!

Archimedes Plutonium schrieb:
> Konig der Wissenshaften

Archimedes Plutonium schrieb:
> One of TV's and Movies best-ever produced-- THE GREAT WHALE RESCUE, left me in tears for most of the 1 hour show// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH
> 2m views
>
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
>
> One of TV's and Movies best-ever produced-- THE GREAT WHALE RESCUE, left me in tears for most of the 1 hour show// SCIENCE COUNCIL RULES EARTH
>
> Magnificent tv and movie. The story of two beluga whales moved from Shangai China to Iceland sanctuary.
>
> "The Great Whale Rescue"
> "This incredible story of two beluga whales released from captivity into a wild ocean sanctuary follows every step of their complex and deeply moving journey."
>
> Everything about this show makes me proud to be a human.
>
> And this show perhaps marks a turning point in wildlife documentaries. To leave the viewers in a happy state of mind. Not shows that tell us we are extincting another species, that we are destroying more habitat and see death and dying of wild animals. Shows that leave us angry and empty inside.
>
> But a show that uplifts animal and plant lovers, uplifts their spirits and makes them proud, that I am a human and will bend over backwards to help save wildlife.
>
> Now, we see this Whale saving in 2020-2022.
>
> But, imagine, can we do it in 1,000 years from now, where, like Noah's Ark we transport two whales from Earth to live in the oceans of Europa? Can you fathom that???
>
> So that humanity becomes Noah, saving wildlife because our Sun has gone Red Giant phase and we only have 1,000 year window to have a permanent colony on Europa.
>
> And as the Sun gets worse and worse, can we transport two whales from Earth to Europa????
>
> So that humanity the killer and extinctor of wildlife, becomes humanity, the Savior of wildlife. Maybe we just simply owe wildlife that pay back for extincting so much of wildlife, we owe them to saving them along side saving ourselves.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
> Nov 17, 2022, 5:19:25 PM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> There is a question of Logic that I would like to ask the people who performed this operation of moving Little White and Little Grey to Iceland from China.
>
> Reading that Little Grey was more curious more friendly than Little White.
>
> My question is, would it have been best to move Little Grey, the easier one to move, move her first, and then move the more difficult whale???
>
> My logic here is that by moving the easiest one first, may bring up glitches in the moving process that can be applied to the more difficult move of the more difficult whale. That is my reasoning.
>
> Move the easiest one to move first.
>
> I want to see the movie over again to see if it was Little White, that you moved first, the more difficult one.
>
> I suppose there could be some logic in moving the most difficult one first in that all the helpers are in best form, and the second move would be easier on the helpers.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
> Nov 17, 2022, 7:54:33 PM (2 days ago)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Yes, I believe this is a logical order of operation for 2 or more repeated events. That you move the easiest First, for you may learn something that will benefit the movers in moving the most difficult.
>
> For in the case of rescuing these two beluga whales, Little White and Little Grey, that Grey was the easiest to move and move her first, later, move Little White, a more difficult move.
>
> AP
> Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
> Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
> 2:02 AM (now)
> 
> 
> 
> to Plutonium Atom Universe
> Yes, fortunately I was able to see a repeat of this magnificent movie The Great Whale Rescue of moving Little Grey and Little White from Shanghai China to Iceland.
>
> And I believe my advice holds true-- in moving more than 1 animals, move the easiest first, then the more difficult ones later.
>
> I say this because of the logical reasoning that in moving the easiest first, you may learn something about the move that applies to the more difficult ones in moving them.
>
> So in this case, they should have moved Little Grey first, not Little White. And in China if they had moved Little Grey first, they probably would have saved time and reached the airport where the customs officials were still there.
>
> When in Iceland, if they had moved Little Grey first, being the easier one to move, they probably would have saved time and especially saved Little White from getting her tail fluke cut and bleeding.
>
> Please take my advice in future animal moves-- move the easiest ones first for you can learn something that may make the overall moving go better.
>
> If you move the most difficult first, there is the possibility that the difficulty is so great that it ruins the entire move altogether.
>
> AP
>