Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The more I know men the more I like my horse.

interests / sci.anthropology.paleo / Re: Evidence vs logic

SubjectAuthor
* Evidence vs logicMario Petrinovic
`* Evidence vs logicJTEM is so reasonable
 `* Evidence vs logicMario Petrinovic
  `* Evidence vs logicJTEM is so reasonable
   `- Evidence vs logicMario Petrinovic

1
Evidence vs logic

<ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=18255&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#18255

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!Iskon!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Evidence vs logic
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:19:39 +0200
Organization: Iskon Internet d.d.
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-139-198-237.adsl.net.t-com.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1695287978 30518 93.139.198.237 (21 Sep 2023 09:19:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:19:38 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
 by: Mario Petrinovic - Thu, 21 Sep 2023 09:19 UTC

I am claiming that people were much more advanced than what science is
claiming. Science is using evidence, I am using logic. The latest
evidence of wooden structure is 476 ky old. How old was the previous
evidence? 9 ky.
So, science concluded that people weren't advanced based on 9 ky old
evidence. Why they are not using logic instead? Logic is much more accurate.

Re: Evidence vs logic

<5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=18263&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#18263

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:b82:b0:64a:24a4:3b9b with SMTP id fe2-20020a0562140b8200b0064a24a43b9bmr10743qvb.13.1695458216515;
Sat, 23 Sep 2023 01:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:19a2:b0:3a7:b15d:b59d with SMTP id
bj34-20020a05680819a200b003a7b15db59dmr992064oib.11.1695458216105; Sat, 23
Sep 2023 01:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 01:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:5c3d:5596:c2e7:8e98;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:5c3d:5596:c2e7:8e98
References: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Evidence vs logic
From: jtem01@gmail.com (JTEM is so reasonable)
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:36:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 2927
 by: JTEM is so reasonabl - Sat, 23 Sep 2023 08:36 UTC

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

> I am claiming that people were much more advanced than what
> science is claiming.

Paleo anthropology isn't a science.

> Science is using evidence, I am using logic.

The problem with logic is that we think it's "a" thing when in fact
there's as many different versions as there are people.

> The latest
> evidence of wooden structure is 476 ky old.

Bullshit.

Remember THIS:

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/144203370383

There is a never ending flood of absolute BULLSHIT claims
made by the fraudulent pseudo science. But, when it
comes to the Out of Africa purity idiocy, they throw the
bullshit into overdrive... or they start feeding laxatives to
the bulls.

And in this particular case, the incredibly UNscientific
selection bias is working overtime:

https://deeprootsafrica.blog

Yeah, THAT'S who "Found" and are making these claims.
They're actually telling you that they're not looking for
human origins. They're telling you that THEY KNOW
human origins already, and all they're doing is digging
in Africa, where they already decided humans originated,
looking for those humans...

It's EXACLY what "Biblical Archaeologists" do, only they're
honest about it. The Biblical Archaeologist are honest. Not
the paleo anthropologists.

> How old was the previous evidence?

About 400,000 years old. In France. Terra Amata.

> So, science concluded that people weren't advanced based
> on 9 ky old evidence.

If they find a broken rock in Africa: Tools! *Billions* of them!
Dig down a meter or METERS and you keep finding hand
axes... acres of them...

If they find a '57 Cadillac in the Americas: Geofact! Totally
natural. It just looks man made.

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/144203370383

Re: Evidence vs logic

<uemehm$shk$1@sunce.iskon.hr>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=18265&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#18265

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!Iskon!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Evidence vs logic
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 12:27:02 +0200
Organization: Iskon Internet d.d.
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <uemehm$shk$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
<5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-16-77.adsl.net.t-com.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1695464822 29236 89.172.16.77 (23 Sep 2023 10:27:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:27:02 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Mario Petrinovic - Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:27 UTC

On 23.9.2023. 10:36, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> Mario Petrinovic wrote:
>
>> I am claiming that people were much more advanced than what
>> science is claiming.
>
> Paleo anthropology isn't a science.
>
>> Science is using evidence, I am using logic.
>
> The problem with logic is that we think it's "a" thing when in fact
> there's as many different versions as there are people.

Well, this isn't the fault of the logic, it is the fault of people who
are delusional, just like you are.

>> The latest
>> evidence of wooden structure is 476 ky old.

>> How old was the previous evidence?
>
> About 400,000 years old. In France. Terra Amata.

Everybody, except you, know that those two things aren't the same.
Something is terribly wrong with you if you make such superficial
conclusions.

>> So, science concluded that people weren't advanced based
>> on 9 ky old evidence.
>
> If they find a broken rock in Africa: Tools! *Billions* of them!
> Dig down a meter or METERS and you keep finding hand
> axes... acres of them...
>
> If they find a '57 Cadillac in the Americas: Geofact! Totally
> natural. It just looks man made.

Re: Evidence vs logic

<770282af-d2a1-4772-8029-14df08582498n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=18266&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#18266

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:174a:b0:40d:4c6:bce6 with SMTP id l10-20020a05622a174a00b0040d04c6bce6mr22007qtk.7.1695481037902;
Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1790:b0:3ad:29a4:f54f with SMTP id
bg16-20020a056808179000b003ad29a4f54fmr1386059oib.4.1695481037633; Sat, 23
Sep 2023 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <uemehm$shk$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:10fc:e3d0:b7fd:f8e8;
posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:192:4c7f:4ba0:10fc:e3d0:b7fd:f8e8
References: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr> <5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>
<uemehm$shk$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <770282af-d2a1-4772-8029-14df08582498n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Evidence vs logic
From: jtem01@gmail.com (JTEM is so reasonable)
Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:57:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1894
 by: JTEM is so reasonabl - Sat, 23 Sep 2023 14:57 UTC

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

> JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> > Mario Petrinovic wrote:
> >> How old was the previous evidence?
> >
> > About 400,000 years old. In France. Terra Amata.

> Everybody, except you, know that those two things aren't the same.

You're barking at the moon again... incoherent gibberish.

Fake science: "France? No way! It's just a rock that looks like wood
or something."

Fake science: "It looks like a notch on this wood in Africa! The Spruce
Goose was made of wood, CLEARLY they were building airplanes in
Africa 8 million years ago! Plus Naledi invented Calculus."

-- --

https://jtem.tumblr.com/post/144203370383

Re: Evidence vs logic

<uemuv1$9c8$1@sunce.iskon.hr>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/interests/article-flat.php?id=18267&group=sci.anthropology.paleo#18267

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!Iskon!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mario.petrinovic1@zg.htnet.hr (Mario Petrinovic)
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Evidence vs logic
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 17:07:12 +0200
Organization: Iskon Internet d.d.
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <uemuv1$9c8$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
References: <ueh1ra$tpm$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
<5b60351f-73cd-4a41-967b-2bcaeb77f800n@googlegroups.com>
<uemehm$shk$1@sunce.iskon.hr>
<770282af-d2a1-4772-8029-14df08582498n@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89-172-16-77.adsl.net.t-com.hr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sunce.iskon.hr 1695481633 9608 89.172.16.77 (23 Sep 2023 15:07:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@iskon.hr
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <770282af-d2a1-4772-8029-14df08582498n@googlegroups.com>
 by: Mario Petrinovic - Sat, 23 Sep 2023 15:07 UTC

On 23.9.2023. 16:57, JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
> Mario Petrinovic wrote:
>> JTEM is so reasonable wrote:
>>> Mario Petrinovic wrote:
>>>> How old was the previous evidence?
>>>
>>> About 400,000 years old. In France. Terra Amata.
>
>> Everybody, except you, know that those two things aren't the same.
>
> You're barking at the moon again... incoherent gibberish.
>
> Fake science: "France? No way! It's just a rock that looks like wood
> or something."
>
> Fake science: "It looks like a notch on this wood in Africa! The Spruce
> Goose was made of wood, CLEARLY they were building airplanes in
> Africa 8 million years ago! Plus Naledi invented Calculus."

Again, very superficial thinking.

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor