Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Weekends were made for programming. -- Karl Lehenbauer


tech / sci.electronics.repair / Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

SubjectAuthor
* Battery Less Smoke Detectorsvjp2.at
+- Battery Less Smoke DetectorsAndy Burns
+* Battery Less Smoke Detectorsphilo
|`* Battery Less Smoke DetectorsAndy Burns
| `* Battery Less Smoke DetectorsCarlos E.R.
|  `* Battery Less Smoke Detectorsbitrex
|   `* Battery Less Smoke DetectorsStephen Wolstenholme
|    `- Battery Less Smoke Detectorsbitrex
`* Battery Less Smoke Detectorsehsjr
 +- Battery Less Smoke Detectorsvjp2.at
 `- Battery Less Smoke Detectorsbitrex

1
Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3672&group=sci.electronics.repair#3672

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:15:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Samani Marions Panyaught NYC-11357-3436-287-USA
Message-ID: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:15:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix1.panix.com:166.84.1.1";
logging-data="2362"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.0-20210823 ("Coleburn") (NetBSD/9.3 (amd64))
 by: vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:15 UTC

Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
How do you fiind such today?

It seems those goon-ghules decide what you want
You ask for "x not y" and they forget your condiditon

--
Vasos Panagiotopoulos panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<k98k6cF3rb6U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3673&group=sci.electronics.repair#3673

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:17:30 +0100
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <k98k6cF3rb6U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Cvrh8S/1abjnT1lxIx8SfAomy1/6tRdKIehofrosYyFL4ohK+F
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4QL96GtlGVSWczyoQ7v75S7Xa5U=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
 by: Andy Burns - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:17 UTC

vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:

> Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
> How do you fiind such today?

over here "interlinked" would be a good extra keyword.

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3675&group=sci.electronics.repair#3675

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: philo@privacy.net (philo)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 14:33:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:33:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8666750ae2137ff544c7d108eb45aa6";
logging-data="509041"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198jkEs+NYuzjUq8c0qpGgxKwEAB4vOox8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:owjG3o+Ep1vE3B4uAzXOCJHlB10=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
 by: philo - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 19:33 UTC

On 4/6/23 2:15 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
> Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
> How do you fiind such today?
>
> It seems those goon-ghules decide what you want
> You ask for "x not y" and they forget your condiditon
>

Bad idea. If the power is out, no alarm.
Power could be out due to an electrical fire.

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3677&group=sci.electronics.repair#3677

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!lilly.ping.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 21:13:02 +0100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net dDnX5u9ZvDr13zmRx0IX+weB6IQY5b8ya/ZvfQzU8LBBcuk68N
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+W6y/ciXx4fuDB4WGm6g+aia8CI=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Andy Burns - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:13 UTC

philo wrote:

> vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
>
>> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
>
> Bad idea. If the power is out, no alarm.
> Power could be out due to an electrical fire.

wire the alarm circuit in MICC?

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3681&group=sci.electronics.repair#3681

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ehsjr@verizon.net (ehsjr)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:24:50 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 22:24:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dd5e5e1f039f83fad7908bb038575972";
logging-data="558705"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19s6p51K0I88SZDPQPWW+rq"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KXXyJo1YTBPgnSnjfoYYCVUlj6Y=
In-Reply-To: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
Content-Language: en-US
 by: ehsjr - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 22:24 UTC

On 4/6/2023 3:15 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
> Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
> How do you fiind such today?
>
> It seems those goon-ghules decide what you want
> You ask for "x not y" and they forget your condiditon
>

Search for hardwired smoke alarm.
The word "hardwired" means they are powered from the
AC mains. (They also include a backup battery.)

Ed

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<u0nk00$2c4$2@reader2.panix.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3683&group=sci.electronics.repair#3683

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix1.panix.com!not-for-mail
From: vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 23:18:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Samani Marions Panyaught NYC-11357-3436-287-USA
Message-ID: <u0nk00$2c4$2@reader2.panix.com>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 23:18:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="panix1.panix.com:166.84.1.1";
logging-data="2436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.0-20210823 ("Coleburn") (NetBSD/9.3 (amd64))
 by: vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 23:18 UTC

In <u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org> by ehsjr <ehsjr@verizon.net> on Thu, 06 Apr 2023 18:24:50 we perused:
*+-On 4/6/2023 3:15 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
*+-> Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
*+-> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
*+-> How do you fiind such today?
*+->
*+-> It seems those goon-ghules decide what you want
*+-> You ask for "x not y" and they forget your condiditon
*+->

*+-Search for hardwired smoke alarm.
*+-The word "hardwired" means they are powered from the
*+-AC mains. (They also include a backup battery.)

Many thanks. I kinda found it but wasn't sure

--
Vasos Panagiotopoulos panix.com/~vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3684&group=sci.electronics.repair#3684

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: robin_listas@es.invalid (Carlos E.R.)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 01:26:11 +0200
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
<k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net gBh30ujgkjNP33lYX5waggRfIjfAC1zNXgZid/LClwdZyDT1v3
X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ByLdUOgSV1dx2MGnWhnBCTFtIHE=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.8.0
Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA
In-Reply-To: <k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net>
 by: Carlos E.R. - Thu, 6 Apr 2023 23:26 UTC

On 2023-04-06 22:13, Andy Burns wrote:
> philo wrote:
>
>> vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
>>
>>> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
>>
>> Bad idea. If the power is out, no alarm.
>> Power could be out due to an electrical fire.
>
> wire the alarm circuit in MICC?
>
>

MICC (Model International Criminal Court)?

First google hit. No idea what MICC may be for you.

If you refer to "Mineral Insulated Copper Cable", no. The mains may
still be out.

The main reason to have the detectors run from battery is precisely to
avoid failures due to failed mains.

--
Cheers, Carlos.

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<cwfYL.2034855$9sn9.295044@fx17.iad>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3690&group=sci.electronics.repair#3690

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.uzoreto.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx17.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com>
<u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: user@example.net (bitrex)
In-Reply-To: <u0ngri$h1jh$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <cwfYL.2034855$9sn9.295044@fx17.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:13:12 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:13:13 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1636
 by: bitrex - Sat, 8 Apr 2023 15:13 UTC

On 4/6/2023 6:24 PM, ehsjr wrote:
> On 4/6/2023 3:15 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
>> Twenty years ago Maintenance Wharehouse used to sell
>> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
>> How do you fiind such today?
>>
>> It seems those goon-ghules decide what you want
>> You ask for "x not y" and they forget your condiditon
>>
>
> Search for hardwired smoke alarm.
> The word "hardwired" means they are powered from the
> AC mains. (They also include a backup battery.)
>
> Ed

Incidentally the laws of the state of Massachusetts requires hardwired
smoke detectors in all one and two family homes permitted (i.e.
constructed and/or renovated) post 1975, prior to sale or transfer of
the property.

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<fCfYL.2034856$9sn9.1475482@fx17.iad>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3691&group=sci.electronics.repair#3691

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer02.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx17.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Content-Language: en-US
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
<k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net> <j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
From: user@example.net (bitrex)
In-Reply-To: <j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <fCfYL.2034856$9sn9.1475482@fx17.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 15:19:39 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:19:39 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1965
 by: bitrex - Sat, 8 Apr 2023 15:19 UTC

On 4/6/2023 7:26 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 2023-04-06 22:13, Andy Burns wrote:
>> philo wrote:
>>
>>> vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> smoke detecotres that hard wired to 110VAC, no batteries.
>>>
>>> Bad idea. If the power is out, no alarm.
>>> Power could be out due to an electrical fire.
>>
>> wire the alarm circuit in MICC?
>>
>>
>
> MICC (Model International Criminal Court)?
>
> First google hit. No idea what MICC may be for you.
>
> If you refer to "Mineral Insulated Copper Cable", no. The mains may
> still be out.
>
> The main reason to have the detectors run from battery is precisely to
> avoid failures due to failed mains.
>
>

I doubt any first-world fire code would allow the installation of
mains-only smoke detectors, they're going to be either battery only or
mains-powered with a battery backup.

Some more recent codes don't even want the user to be able to tamper
with the battery and the battery-powered units are to be sealed at the
factory.

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<ls133idqftd31sgk1051ije4hsc5e5gk7t@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3693&group=sci.electronics.repair#3693

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: stephen.wolstenholme@outlook.com (Stephen Wolstenholme)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 16:40:12 +0100
Organization: Neural Planner Software Ltd
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <ls133idqftd31sgk1051ije4hsc5e5gk7t@4ax.com>
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me> <k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net> <j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <fCfYL.2034856$9sn9.1475482@fx17.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c24c77bc6c4dc79fcc71d01c3eb95bf";
logging-data="1390749"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/j/CNhGqC3b04eGSTD7LZl+PnN2Y1tIpU="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZJoB8Fezqqccp+pddrOlVM7g2qc=
 by: Stephen Wolstenholme - Sat, 8 Apr 2023 15:40 UTC

On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:19:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

>Some more recent codes don't even want the user to be able to tamper
>with the battery and the battery-powered units are to be sealed at the
>factory.

We have a factory sealed unit in the house we moved into seven years
ago. It beeps when I burn the toast!

Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors

<WxlYL.273530$rKDc.112043@fx34.iad>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=3694&group=sci.electronics.repair#3694

  copy link   Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx34.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.9.1
Subject: Re: Battery Less Smoke Detectors
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair
References: <u0n5oo$29q$1@reader2.panix.com> <u0n6q8$fh3h$1@dont-email.me>
<k98negF4bbbU1@mid.individual.net> <j114gjxoqt.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
<fCfYL.2034856$9sn9.1475482@fx17.iad>
<ls133idqftd31sgk1051ije4hsc5e5gk7t@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: user@example.net (bitrex)
In-Reply-To: <ls133idqftd31sgk1051ije4hsc5e5gk7t@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <WxlYL.273530$rKDc.112043@fx34.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@frugalusenet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2023 22:04:38 UTC
Organization: frugalusenet - www.frugalusenet.com
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 18:04:39 -0400
X-Received-Bytes: 1404
 by: bitrex - Sat, 8 Apr 2023 22:04 UTC

On 4/8/2023 11:40 AM, Stephen Wolstenholme wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 11:19:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>
>> Some more recent codes don't even want the user to be able to tamper
>> with the battery and the battery-powered units are to be sealed at the
>> factory.
>
> We have a factory sealed unit in the house we moved into seven years
> ago. It beeps when I burn the toast!
>

Sounds like it's doing its job! It doesn't know ya cookin'

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor