On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>
>
> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>
> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>
> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/

Unaffordable.

And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
bleeding the tax payer dry.

It says nothing about Musk's efforts.

Sylvia.

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>
>>
>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>>
>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>
>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>
>Unaffordable.
>
>And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>bleeding the tax payer dry.
>
>It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>
>Sylvia.
>

Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !

On 2023-09-11 3:23 a.m., Doctor Who wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>>>
>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>
>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>
>> Unaffordable.
>>
>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>
>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>
>> Sylvia.
>>
>
> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> rocket !
>

You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.

Alain Fournier

On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
> wrote:
> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >>
> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >>
> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >
> >Unaffordable.
> >
> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >
> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >
> >Sylvia.
> >
> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> rocket !

I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 06:36:17 -0400, Alain Fournier
<alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

>On 2023-09-11 3:23 a.m., Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>>>>
>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>>
>>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>>
>>> Unaffordable.
>>>
>>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>>> bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>>
>>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>>
>>> Sylvia.
>>>
>>
>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> rocket !
>>
>
>You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.

which uses only failed rockets.

>
>
>Alain Fournier

On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
>> wrote:
>> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>> >>
>> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>> >>
>> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>> >
>> >Unaffordable.
>> >
>> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
>> >
>> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>> >
>> >Sylvia.
>> >
>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> rocket !
>
>I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets

We don't need any help.

On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >> >>
> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >> >>
> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >> >
> >> >Unaffordable.
> >> >
> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >> >
> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >> >
> >> >Sylvia.
> >> >
> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> >> rocket !
> >
> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
> We don't need any help.

If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?

On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>> >> >
>> >> >Unaffordable.
>> >> >
>> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
>> >> >
>> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>> >> >
>> >> >Sylvia.
>> >> >
>> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> >> rocket !
>> >
>> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>> We don't need any help.
>
>If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?

It is fun to see you troll-back :-)

On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Unaffordable.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Sylvia.
> >> >> >
> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> >> >> rocket !
> >> >
> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
> >> We don't need any help.
> >
> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)

How's that financial backing coming along?

On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Unaffordable.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Sylvia.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> >> >> rocket !
>> >> >
>> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>> >> We don't need any help.
>> >
>> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>
>How's that financial backing coming along?

Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?

You will suffer less...

Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S.. Government Accountability Office.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html

Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/

Il giorno lunedì 11 settembre 2023 alle 09:23:45 UTC+2 Doctor Who ha scritto:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
> wrote:
> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >>
> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >>
> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >
> >Unaffordable.
> >
> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >
> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >
> >Sylvia.
> >
> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> rocket !

Really if Artemis is unaffordable it is a comic to think that Musk alone can colonize the Moon and Mars.
However this can be believed in Italy since the asylums have been declared illegaly :-)

On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Unaffordable.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Sylvia.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> >> >> >> rocket !
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
> >> >> We don't need any help.
> >> >
> >> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
> >
> >How's that financial backing coming along?
> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>
> You will suffer less...
As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.
What are you waiting for?

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Unaffordable.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> >> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Sylvia.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> >> >> >> rocket !
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>> >> >> We don't need any help.
>> >> >
>> >> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
>> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>> >
>> >How's that financial backing coming along?
>> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>>
>> You will suffer less...
>As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.
> What are you waiting for?

You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.

Kill yourself now!

On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19 AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> >> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email..invalid>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Unaffordable.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
> >> >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
> >> >> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Sylvia.
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
> >> >> >> >> rocket !
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
> >> >> >> We don't need any help.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
> >> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
> >> >
> >> >How's that financial backing coming along?
> >> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
> >>
> >> You will suffer less...
> >As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.
> > What are you waiting for?
> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>
> Kill yourself now!

So, when does your first orbital flight happen?

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> >> >> >> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Unaffordable.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>> >> >> >> >> >expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been
>> >> >> >> >> >bleeding the tax payer dry.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Sylvia.
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>> >> >> >> >> rocket !
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into space. So here: https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>> >> >> >> We don't need any help.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
>> >> >> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>> >> >
>> >> >How's that financial backing coming along?
>> >> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>> >>
>> >> You will suffer less...
>> >As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your bandwagon.
>> > What are you waiting for?
>> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>>
>> Kill yourself now!
>
>So, when does your first orbital flight happen?

again fuck off again !

Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
> <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>>>>>>>>>> <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Unaffordable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>>>>>>>>>>>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have
>>>>>>>>>>>> been bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>>>>>>>>>>> rocket !
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into
>>>>>>>>>> space. So here:
>>>>>>>>>> https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>>>>>>>>> We don't need any help.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
>>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How's that financial backing coming along?
>>>>> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>>>>>
>>>>> You will suffer less...
>>>> As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your
>>>> bandwagon. What are you waiting for?
>>> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
>>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>>>
>>> Kill yourself now!
>>
>> So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
>
>
> again fuck off again !

If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
group, where there's none of the resources you need.

/dps

--
"First thing in the morning, before I have coffee, I read the obits, If
I'm not in it, I'll have breakfast." -- Carl Reiner, to CBS News in
2015.

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:40:26 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>> <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>>>>>>>>>>> <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System — the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible," according to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unaffordable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> been bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
>>>>>>>>>>>> rocket !
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention into
>>>>>>>>>>> space. So here:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>>>>>>>>>> We don't need any help.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on here?
>>>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How's that financial backing coming along?
>>>>>> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You will suffer less...
>>>>> As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on your
>>>>> bandwagon. What are you waiting for?
>>>> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
>>>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>>>>
>>>> Kill yourself now!
>>>
>>> So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
>>
>>
>> again fuck off again !
>
>If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
>group, where there's none of the resources you need.
>
>
>/dps

I do what I want, thank you!

Just this Tuesday, Doctor Who puzzled about:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:40:26 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>> <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System —
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program to establish a moon base — is "inaccessible,"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unaffordable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian
>>>>>>>>>>>>> propulsion rocket !
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention
>>>>>>>>>>>> into space. So here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>>>>>>>>>>> We don't need any help.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on
>>>>>>>>>> here?
>>>>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How's that financial backing coming along?
>>>>>>> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You will suffer less...
>>>>>> As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on
>>>>>> your bandwagon. What are you waiting for?
>>>>> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
>>>>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kill yourself now!
>>>>
>>>> So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
>>>
>>>
>>> again fuck off again !
>>
>> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
>> group, where there's none of the resources you need.
>>
>>
>> /dps
>
>
> I do what I want, thank you!

Which is to come here and masturbate and act childish, eh?

/dps

--
We’ve learned way more than we wanted to know about the early history
of American professional basketball, like that you could have once
watched a game between teams named the Indianapolis Kautskys and the
Akron Firestone Non-Skids. -- fivethirtyeight.com

On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
[snip]
>> again fuck off again !
>
> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
> group, where there's none of the resources you need.

I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting
financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their
device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
and proooooooot.

Alain Fournier

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 13:11:38 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Just this Tuesday, Doctor Who puzzled about:
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:40:26 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
>>>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>> <damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 7:52:19?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 3:38:37?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 04:24:43 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:01:27?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:54:19 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 8:05:13?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
>>>>>>>>>>>> <dama...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:23:45?AM UTC-4, Doctor Who
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Senior NASA officials say the agency's Space Launch System ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> program to establish a moon base ? is "inaccessible,"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Office.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/index.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unaffordable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And it's specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have been bleeding the tax payer dry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It says nothing about Musk's efforts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> propulsion rocket !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suspect you and your cohorts need help getting your invention
>>>>>>>>>>>>> into space. So here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://estesrockets.com/collections/rockets?gclid=Cj0KCQjw9fqnBhDSARIsAHlcQYQ89mpo29QlGzeh-TV0cku-5JjH63JG-HSRt-zZUeUMjAl22jyC9bAaAqNYEALw_wcB&hsa_acc=9787008750&hsa_ad=504603911508&hsa_cam=12406691490&hsa_grp=121462491080&hsa_kw=estes%20rockets&hsa_mt=b&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_src=g&hsa_tgt=kwd-14843350&hsa_ver=3&utm_campaign=Estes%20Rockets&utm_content=gsem-rsa-01&utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=adwords&utm_term=estes%20rockets
>>>>>>>>>>>> We don't need any help.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you don't need help, why are you so persistently trolling on
>>>>>>>>>>> here?
>>>>>>>>>> It is fun to see you troll-back :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How's that financial backing coming along?
>>>>>>>> Hey Markley, why don't you jump off a roof?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You will suffer less...
>>>>>>> As soon as you demonstrate a reactionless drive, I will jump right on
>>>>>>> your bandwagon. What are you waiting for?
>>>>>> You missed the demonstration because you weren't invited to. On the
>>>>>> other hand I was invited and I have seen PNN in action.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kill yourself now!
>>>>>
>>>>> So, when does your first orbital flight happen?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> again fuck off again !
>>>
>>> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
>>> group, where there's none of the resources you need.
>>>
>>>
>>> /dps
>>
>>
>> I do what I want, thank you!
>
>Which is to come here and masturbate and act childish, eh?
>
>/dps

Proooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooootttttttt

On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:18:45 -0400, Alain Fournier
<alain245@videotron.ca> wrote:

>On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
>> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
>[snip]
>>> again fuck off again !
>>
>> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
>> group, where there's none of the resources you need.
>
>I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
>If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
>I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
>who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting
>financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their
>device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
>and proooooooot.
>
>
>Alain Fournier

Prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot

On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 5:56:31 PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:18:45 -0400, Alain Fournier
> <alai...@videotron.ca> wrote:
>
> >On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
> >> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
> >[snip]
> >>> again fuck off again !
> >>
> >> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
> >> group, where there's none of the resources you need.
> >
> >I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
> >If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
> >I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
> >who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting
> >financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their
> >device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
> >and proooooooot.
> >
> >
> >Alain Fournier
> Prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot

I wonder why the trolls never seem to understand that they are trolls?

On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 04:20:06 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 5:56:31?PM UTC-4, Doctor Who wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:18:45 -0400, Alain Fournier
>> <alai...@videotron.ca> wrote:
>>
>> >On 2023-09-19 3:40 p.m., Snidely wrote:
>> >> Doctor Who submitted this gripping article, maybe on Tuesday:
>> >[snip]
>> >>> again fuck off again !
>> >>
>> >> If you want to avoid our comments, you can just skip posting in this
>> >> group, where there's none of the resources you need.
>> >
>> >I wouldn't say that there's none of the resources that they need here.
>> >If they could convince us all that they really do have a "magic drive",
>> >I think that there are engineers here and I know there are some people
>> >who at least visit occasionally that could organize some interesting
>> >financing. But no one here will go help people who can't show that their
>> >device works and have for most common answer variations of "fuck off"
>> >and proooooooot.
>> >
>> >
>> >Alain Fournier
>> Prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot
>
>I wonder why the trolls never seem to understand that they are trolls?

Prooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooot

On 2023-09-11 06:36, Alain Fournier wrote:

> You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.

Isn't Space Exploration Technologies Corp privately held company and
thus does not need to release financial statements?

Considering all the money being spent on Starlink and Starship, I doubt
that if financuial statements were released, they would show profit.
Am pretty confident their commercial launches do generate positive cash
flow when the customer is not SpaceX itself, but question whether that
cash inflow is greater than the amount of money being spent to so
Starlink and Starship. (and subsidize Starlink subscribers).