Prof.Ph.Tobias 1995: "physiologically, biochemically and histologically, we should be hopeless as savanna-dwellers. All of the former savanna supporters must swallow our earlier words."

IOW, traditional paleo-anthropology was 4x incredibly wrong:
our Plio-Pleistocene ancestors were no African savanna dwellers, but:
- Aquarboreal: Mio-Pliocene Hominoidea already waded+climbed bipedally is swamp forests, google "aquarboreal" (aqua=water, arbor=tree).
- Archaic Homo dived for shellfish, google "pachyosteosclerosis": Pleistocene H.erectus cs: DHA & brain size.
- Asian origin (afrocentric prejudice): Pliocene Homo followed Ind.Ocean coasts (e.g. Java H.erectus early-Pleistocene).
- Australopiths were bipedal fossil relatives of Gorilla (E.Africa) or Pan (initially S.Africa), not of Homo (retroviral evidence: Pliocene Homo was in S-Asia).

The savanna idea of human evolution (a fortiori running after antelopes!!) is an incredibly ridiculous fantasy, but when will PAs finally abandon all these just-so fantasies??

See my new book
https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

On 5/29/23 6:41 AM, marc verhaegen wrote:
> Prof.Ph.Tobias 1995: "physiologically, biochemically and histologically, we should be hopeless as savanna-dwellers. All of the former savanna supporters must swallow our earlier words."
>
> IOW, traditional paleo-anthropology was 4x incredibly wrong:
> our Plio-Pleistocene ancestors were no African savanna dwellers, but:
> - Aquarboreal: Mio-Pliocene Hominoidea already waded+climbed bipedally is swamp forests, google "aquarboreal" (aqua=water, arbor=tree).
> - Archaic Homo dived for shellfish, google "pachyosteosclerosis": Pleistocene H.erectus cs: DHA & brain size.
> - Asian origin (afrocentric prejudice): Pliocene Homo followed Ind.Ocean coasts (e.g. Java H.erectus early-Pleistocene).
> - Australopiths were bipedal fossil relatives of Gorilla (E.Africa) or Pan (initially S.Africa), not of Homo (retroviral evidence: Pliocene Homo was in S-Asia).
>
> The savanna idea of human evolution (a fortiori running after antelopes!!) is an incredibly ridiculous fantasy, but when will PAs finally abandon all these just-so fantasies??
>
> See my new book
> https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/
>
This is spam. Stop.

Op maandag 29 mei 2023 om 18:32:20 UTC+2 schreef John Harshman:
calls prof.Tobias "spam"...
:-DDD

Already caught your kudu, my little boy?
:-DDD

> On 5/29/23 6:41 AM, marc verhaegen wrote:
> > Prof.Ph.Tobias 1995: "physiologically, biochemically and histologically, we should be hopeless as savanna-dwellers. All of the former savanna supporters must swallow our earlier words."

> > IOW, traditional paleo-anthropology was 4x incredibly wrong:
> > our Plio-Pleistocene ancestors were no African savanna dwellers, but:
> > - Aquarboreal: Mio-Pliocene Hominoidea already waded+climbed bipedally is swamp forests, google "aquarboreal" (aqua=water, arbor=tree).
> > - Archaic Homo dived for shellfish, google "pachyosteosclerosis": Pleistocene H.erectus cs: DHA & brain size.
> > - Asian origin (afrocentric prejudice): Pliocene Homo followed Ind.Ocean coasts (e.g. Java H.erectus early-Pleistocene).
> > - Australopiths were bipedal fossil relatives of Gorilla (E.Africa) or Pan (initially S.Africa), not of Homo (retroviral evidence: Pliocene Homo was in S-Asia).

> > The savanna idea of human evolution (a fortiori running after antelopes!!) is an incredibly ridiculous fantasy, but when will PAs finally abandon all these just-so fantasies??
> > See my new book
> > https://www.gondwanatalks.com/l/the-waterside-hypothesis-wading-led-to-upright-walking-in-early-humans/

> This is spam. Stop.