This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.

The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
top and consistantly wrong in the details.

And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
is so lacking and so poorly done.

On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
> This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
> has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.
>
> The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
> REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
> away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
> top and consistantly wrong in the details.
>
> And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
> clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
> is so lacking and so poorly done.
I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
show is released.

On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
> On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
>> This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
>> has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.
>>
>> The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
>> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
>> REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
>> away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
>> top and consistantly wrong in the details.
>>
>> And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
>> clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
>> is so lacking and so poorly done.
> I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
> PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
> almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
> part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
> show is released.

supposefly they hired a bunch of them

https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/

On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 11:12:38 PM UTC-7, Popping Mad wrote:
> On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
> >> This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
> >> has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.
> >>
> >> The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
> >> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
> >> REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
> >> away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
> >> top and consistantly wrong in the details.
> >>
> >> And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
> >> clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
> >> is so lacking and so poorly done.
> > I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
> > PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
> > almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
> > part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
> > show is released.
> supposefly they hired a bunch of them
>
>
> https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/

… then probably overrode their input, lol…

On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 7:42:13 AM UTC-7, Sight Reader wrote:
> On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 11:12:38 PM UTC-7, Popping Mad wrote:
> > On 11/9/23 11:07, erik simpson wrote:
> > > On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 3:50:03 AM UTC-8, Popping Mad wrote:
> > >> This show, life on our planet, has so much work done on it and it yet it
> > >> has so many errors and inacuracies it makes me crazy to watch it.
> > >>
> > >> The ground zero 90° hit by the KT asteroid was like the final staw for
> > >> me. That and a T-Rex hunting like a lion and then growling? I mean
> > >> REALLY. Any preditor can't growl when hunting or it gives its position
> > >> away. And the three stuges act by the chicks... it is all so over the
> > >> top and consistantly wrong in the details.
> > >>
> > >> And there is nothing new in it The latest releases of work give a much
> > >> clearer picture of many life epics of late. I don't know why this work
> > >> is so lacking and so poorly done.
> > > I don't know what video you're talking about, but I don't need to. Even
> > > PBS' "Nova" presentations are often very disappointing and sometimes
> > > almost incoherent, even when they present knowledgeable experts as
> > > part of the program. Apparently the experts aren't consulted before the
> > > show is released.
> > supposefly they hired a bunch of them
> >
> >
> > https://www.palaeocast.com/life-on-our-planet/
> … then probably overrode their input, lol…

I did like Season 2 of Prehistoric Planet (Apple TV). Not only is the CGI far better, but they greatly toned down the overclaims and wild speculation from Season 1 and discovered it’s still possible to be dramatic simply sticking to things that are likely. I’m no expert but I still raised an eyebrow a few times every episode, but I still found it enjoyable..