Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.


tech / rec.audio.tubes / Re: Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160

SubjectAuthor
* Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160Simon
`- Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160Peter Wieck

1
Re: Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160

<5d986ae7-c078-4bbd-a2aa-a9e2d3d0fd56n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=77&group=rec.audio.tubes#77

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.audio.tubes
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:14b2:b0:5df:51fe:d57c with SMTP id bo18-20020a05621414b200b005df51fed57cmr2982299qvb.3.1680460984475;
Sun, 02 Apr 2023 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d7ce:0:b0:b7d:e643:d3c3 with SMTP id
o197-20020a25d7ce000000b00b7de643d3c3mr12088842ybg.8.1680460984251; Sun, 02
Apr 2023 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tubes
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2023 11:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b2sqkj$567$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=150.143.46.79; posting-account=w5aQwwoAAAB6gEzfqy4o1kMhWVFha5kc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 150.143.46.79
References: <b2sqkj$567$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5d986ae7-c078-4bbd-a2aa-a9e2d3d0fd56n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160
From: flint515@live.com (Simon)
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2023 18:43:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1640
 by: Simon - Sun, 2 Apr 2023 18:43 UTC

On Tuesday, 18 February 2003 at 08:23:08 UTC, Stanley Jobson wrote:
> Sorry if this has been asked before, Newbie at testers.
> Does anyone know the main differences between these (Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT
> 160 )
> two testers. Plus & Minuses. Also is the Hickok 580A and /or the AVO 163
> better than
> both of the above ?
>
> Thank you in Advance
Man, Just look at them. It's kind of obvious which is better. My understanding is that the only Hickok that can go toe-to-toe with an AVO from the same era is the military grade TV-7 and it's derivatives.

Re: Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160

<7d1d3ec6-181b-436e-a750-1b1fdc521dc2n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/tech/article-flat.php?id=78&group=rec.audio.tubes#78

  copy link   Newsgroups: rec.audio.tubes
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a99:b0:748:88dc:da99 with SMTP id v25-20020a05620a0a9900b0074888dcda99mr4176724qkg.0.1680536875351;
Mon, 03 Apr 2023 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:dd0:b0:533:a15a:d33e with SMTP id
db16-20020a05690c0dd000b00533a15ad33emr10783684ywb.5.1680536875086; Mon, 03
Apr 2023 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tubes
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 08:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5d986ae7-c078-4bbd-a2aa-a9e2d3d0fd56n@googlegroups.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2603:301d:d08:bb00:c545:14d9:11c1:9bf5;
posting-account=tQE80AoAAACYibCqNWmwmvQ2q1XctZSS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2603:301d:d08:bb00:c545:14d9:11c1:9bf5
References: <b2sqkj$567$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <5d986ae7-c078-4bbd-a2aa-a9e2d3d0fd56n@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <7d1d3ec6-181b-436e-a750-1b1fdc521dc2n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Hickok 752 vs. AVO- CT 160
From: peterwieck33@gmail.com (Peter Wieck)
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 15:47:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2899
 by: Peter Wieck - Mon, 3 Apr 2023 15:47 UTC

> Man, Just look at them. It's kind of obvious which is better. My understanding is that the only Hickok that can go toe-to-toe with an AVO from the same era is the military grade TV-7 and it's derivatives.

Yes, 20 years later, but NO, the TV-7 is nowhere near as adept as its reputation. That it is a military tester accounts for its ruggedness, but not for much of anything else. It was designed to do go/no-go tests of tubes in military equipment under field conditions, quickly, and with some ability to distinguish quality - one tube relative to another of the same type. But it is not designed for matching, one cannot measure plate or filament current, anode current, nor any other parameters required to 'match' tubes without considerable additional adaptors and other equipment. One cannot set bias internally, nor supply bias current from the outside.

For any of that, the 539-series is required, with specific reference to the B & the C, which have points built in where all of that may be measured or set.

The AVO may be a bit fussy and complicated, but it is (at least) three times the tester as the 752 - which, put simply, is a non-ruggedized TV-7 in terms of complexity and capacity. That TV-7 testers command insane prices is more a reflection of the ignorance of their buyers than the quality and utility of the tester as it relates to actual function.

NOTE: I keep a Hickok 539B and a Simpson 555 tube tester. For 90% of my work, the 555 does just fine. Only when I need to match will I trot out the 539B.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

1
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor