On Monday, January 8, 2024 at 11:00:47 AM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 8:25:11 PM UTC-8, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > On Friday, January 5, 2024 at 3:17:14 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail..com wrote:
> > > On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 8:17:16 PM UTC-8, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 7:37:36 PM UTC-8, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 5:20:07 PM UTC-8, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > > > > > On Thursday, January 4, 2024 at 11:56:14 AM UTC-8, gharnagel wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Are we frame-jumping by saying D can send an infinitely-fast signal, too?
> > > > > > > > > The reason why A and B say that D cannot send a signal to C faster than c^2/v
> > > > > > > > > is because of the relativity of simultaneity RoS), which is a basic conse-
> > > > > > > > > quence of special relativity. Does conceding D's ability to send signals
> > > > > > > > > faster than c^2/v violate RoS? Of course, the TUTH crowd will just deny,
> > > > > > > > > denigrate or claim c is the limit, or do the limits of the possible extend
> > > > > > > > > further?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ross wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Seems you need better mathematics of infinity.
> > > > > > > No problem. QFT had problems, and they were resolved. Have you studied
> > > > > > > conformal mapping and complex variables?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > https://mathworld.wolfram.com/ConformalMapping.html
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are ways to get around these problems in relativity, too. See
> > > > > > > DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101
> > > > > > > > Also you should probably be aware of "Einstein's bridge"
> > > > > > > Do you mean the novel by John Cramer?
> > > > > > > > and "Einstein's second mass/energy equation that's not mc^2",
> > > > > > > > about singularities and central symmetries ("without infinities,
> > > > > > > > but, well, you know, with") and "flowing not jumping".
> > > > > > > Are you referring to the stress-energy tensor?
> > > > > > > > Mathematics OWES physics, more and better physics of infinities,
> > > > > > > > particularly continuous domains about the conceit of particles,
> > > > > > > > really.
> > > > > > > I didn't know particles were conceted. Sounds like a lot of buzz
> > > > > > > words to me.
> > > > > > Hi Gary, thanks for your reply.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Conformal mapping is about most representational as configuration space
> > > > > > to configuration space, about the manifold, and continuous mappings, vis-a-vis
> > > > > > twists and torsions, as we might read about in, "Rindler".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Gaussian analysis or "complex", well, you can take it or leave it, vis-a-vis,
> > > > > > Euler's identity and analyticity, vis-a-vis, the great success of geometric algebras
> > > > > > after Elie Cartan reflections and rotations, what make for that otherwise the
> > > > > > properties of an algebraization about roots of unity, implement reflections and rotations,
> > > > > > separating the Gaussian analysis from "Cartanian", quite altogether. So, mathematics
> > > > > > can be quite "Cartanian", without being altogether, "Gaussian".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Einstein's bridge" is his notion of combining the linear and rotational moment.
> > > > > > It's a fundamental concept that students of Einstein should know.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Einstein's "second mass/energy equation" can be found in "Out of My Later Years"
> > > > > > in the last chapter on science, in it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's all the buzz words, reduced to reflections on canon and modern-day apologetics,
> > > > > > part of foundations, contra "converting wall-papering to grant-writing to wall-papering".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A conceit, just means an abstract concesssion, not your high-falutin conceitedness,
> > > > > > which is a malapropism, in common jargon.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course, it might help if you know that NIST CODATA provides the most current
> > > > > > measurements of fundamental particles their known quantities, and especially,
> > > > > > that, every few years the small ones get smaller and the big ones bigger.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's called "running constants", and about a "theory of sum potentials", which you
> > > > > > can wonder about as pondering the "path integral".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Of course it helps that mathematics has three complementary definitions of continuity,
> > > > > > line-reals for Jordan measure, field-reals for usual delta-epsilonics, and signal-reals for
> > > > > > Dirichlet and otherwise these things together and as one.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > About forces and couplings and various tensors that really only exist as a conceit of
> > > > > > sorts to the spaces of their tensorial products where they preserve properties for example
> > > > > > as of conformal mappings, no I'm talking about Einstein's model of space-contraction.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here's some podcasts I read Einstein's "Out of My Later Years" and try to make
> > > > > > a sincere, generous, insightful reading.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Otherwise if you're interested you'd have to read my 10,000's posts to sic.math.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Dear Professor of Philosophy in Physics, I'm writing you today to show you
> > > > > > what a confirmed opinion in physics looks like."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > information wants to be free, but light speed is the usual static propagation
> > > > > There is the universal speed limit contained in Gamma and E=mc Squared.
> > > > > Nothing moves beyond it.
> > > > > And the atom cannot catch up to it...
> > > > There are many books about a concept that is not called Zen.
> > > In zen it is your path that moves.
> > >
> > > Mitchell Raemsch
> > > >
> > > > Hoover's Zen Experience says the most famous story is from
> > > > the platform sutra of Hui-Neng. At a Buddhist monastery,
> > > > two priests ponder a banner or flag what waves, in the breeze.
> > > >
> > > > The first says, "the flag is waving in the wind."
> > > > The second says, "the wind is waving the flag."
> > > >
> > > > A third says, "It is your mind that moves."
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > > > The most usual and complete logical and scientific theory
> > > > over time is called strong mathematical Platonism, which
> > > > I learned about studying continuity.
> > > >
> > > > Learning is kind of like swimming,
> > > > it's at your own risk,
> > > > and a vital skill in a world that's not always illiquid.
> > > >
> > > > ... and a very healthy exercise.
> > > >
> > > > ...
> > Geometry is motion
> Why do planetary ellipses keep repeating? forever...?

It's just a stationarity of a long duration, that is
but a locally stable minimum of activity in energy,
according to a theory of sum potentials,
of the fall gravity the simplest anisotropic field the gradient,
in otherwise the Einstein's flat Space-Time,
with an infinitesimal cosmological constant.

Even simpler it would actually go back to circles.

Also it's all over the place.