In article <v0f2jl$3ejhl$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 25/04/2024 14:22, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>
>>> IYIO
>>
>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>> logical response?
>
>Since Doctor Who ended in 2017 how can anyone be watching new episodes?
>
>>
>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>
>He's got something useful to contribute. Retcon the Timeless Child. Then
>there might be a possibility of Doctor Who returning to out screens in
>place of the stupid and nonsensical Bugs Bunny inspired Adventures of
>the Timeless Child monster cartoon, circus mallets and all, that RTD and
>the BBC have replaced it with.
>

Thank you!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0f2lr$3ejhl$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>>
>>>> IYIO
>>>
>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>> logical response?
>>>
>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>
>Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot remain
>silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest in peace.
>

Chibnall started this!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

On 2024-04-25 8:14 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
> On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>>
>>>> IYIO
>>>
>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>> logical response?
>>>
>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>
> Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot remain
> silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest in peace.
>

Dear sweet lord get a life already! Doctor Who is a fictional
character, fictional, fictional. What part of fictional is confusing you?

Neither alive nor dead, in fact does not exist so give it a rest and go
find another obsession.

Sheesh.

--
Facisim: The first step is to fascinate fools and muzzle the intelligent

Bertrand Russell

Blueshirt wrote on 25/4/24 11:22 pm:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>
>> IYIO
>
> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
> logical response?
>
> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>

--
Daniel

Opps!!

Blueshirt wrote on 25/4/24 11:22 pm:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>
>> IYIO
>
> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
> logical response?

Perhaps the asswipe is trying to suggest that I (Daniel) should have
suggested to Aggy that He (Aggy) should have posted "... In Your
Informed Opinion (IYIO), No one one can watch it at all." when, in fact,
what I had thought Aggy should have posted was "In My Informed Opinion
(IMHO), No one one can watch it at all"

I think!! ..... Maybe/Perhaps!! Owww!! My head hurts!! Is that a sign of
trying to LOGICALLY follow what the asswipe types??

> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
> Agamemnon.

Hey!! But have you noticed, Blueshirt?? For sooooo long, Aggy seemed to
ignore the asswipe but, now, Aggy is actually responding to the asswipe
DIRECTLY!! My, how times have changed!!

> If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>
Or, didn't he have an (On-line) Animal Farm or something?? (On-line,
because no one in their right mind would let the asswipe NEAR any real
animals!!)
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 12:14 pm:
> On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>>
>>>> IYIO
>>>
>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>> logical response?
>>>
>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>
> Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot remain
> silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest in peace.
>
If people were making reasonable, intellectual, responses to the posts
here, fair enough, but if people are just posting dribble so as to
increase their All-Important Post Count (and to piss everybody else off
of course), well I, for one, wish they'd stop!!
--
Daniel

Idlehands wrote on 26/4/24 2:11 pm:
> On 2024-04-25 8:14 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it
>>>>>>> for every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the
>>>>>> "IMHO" or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE
>>>>>> WATCHING!!
>>>>>
>>>>> IYIO
>>>>
>>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>>> logical response?
>>>>
>>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
>>>> your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>>
>>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>>
>> Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot
>> remain silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest
>> in peace.
>
> Dear sweet lord get a life already! Doctor Who is a fictional
> character, fictional, fictional. What part of fictional is confusing
> you?
>
> Neither alive nor dead, in fact does not exist so give it a rest and
> go find another obsession.
>
> Sheesh.
>
No, for a change I think you, Idlehands, are incorrect. Doctor Who does
exist .... at least in peoples minds .... but some of these minds are
pretty stuffed, so cannot handle what their eyes tell them!! IMHO, of
course!
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 12:08 pm:
> On 25/04/2024 10:41, Daniel70 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>> On 22/04/2024 11:21, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 11:11 am:
>>>>> On 19/04/2024 22:39, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> Fan fic as a term doesn't automatically make something bad or
>>>>>> wrong. I've read some good fan fic over the years. I'd also
>>>>>> consider most of what Big Finish produce as fan fic, just
>>>>>> licensed by the BBC and released on audio... and a lot of it is
>>>>>> very good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Being fair I suppose that's what any Doctor Who is really when
>>>>>> it all boils down to it if a fan of the show is the Executive
>>>>>> Producer... it's their ideas and their vision of the show. Just
>>>>>> like it would be yours or mine if we were writing our ideas
>>>>>> down on paper. The only difference is, they are paid by the BBC
>>>>>> which makes their ideas legitimately part of the show.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's fan fic if it's written in order to entertain fans instead
>>>>> of the general audience
>>>>
>>>> Is there really any such thing as 'the general audience"??
>>>>
>>>> Sure, anybody could watch a program once or twice, three times
>>>> even, but if they keep coming back again and again and again and
>>>> again, aren't they, then, really, FANS??
>>>>
>>>>> or just one group of fans or one fan or fake fan alone as in the
>>>>> case of Chibnall who utterly despised the show
>>>>
>>>> "utterly despised the show"?? REALLY?? If someone 'utterly despised
>>>> a show', couldn't they just STOP watching it?? Or are they strapped
>>>> into a chair with toothpicks keeping their eyes open??
>>>
>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for every. No
>>> one one can watch it at all.
>>>
>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO" or
>> something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE *ARE* WATCHING!!
>
> Since Doctor Who ended in 2017 how can anyone possibly be watching?
> Unless it's old episodes.

But, have you noticed, Aggy, PEOPLE *ARE* WATCHING, maybe not in the
numbers you would like, at least what *THEY* think *is* "Doctor Who"
..... just like people might think they are watching "JAMES BOND 007", no
matter WHO is portraying the LEAD CHARACTER, Aggy!!
--
Daniel

The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 7:45 am:
> On 25/04/2024 15:01, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Terrance Dicks wrote the original script and wrote the
>>>> novelization.
>>>
>>> Terrance Dicks disowned the script - the story was saw was a
>>> compete rewrite by Robert Holmes.
>>
>> The thing is, we can discuss the "Brain of Morbius" all day long,
>> (all week long even) but the simple fact is, whether Agamemnon
>> likes it or not, is that Chris Chibnall (wherever he got the idea
>> from) liked the idea of pre-Hartnell incarnations
>
> He got the idea from DC Comics in order to turn the Doctor into
> Doomsday.
>
>> of the Doctor. And as Executive Producer of Doctor Who he decided
>> to incorporate that idea in to his vision of the show in 2020. So
>> whilst it's fun to debate the ins and outs of 1976, it doesn't
>> change the lore of Doctor Who that we have now in 2024.
>
> Doctor Who ended in 2017.

I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!

>> Doctor Who history features a pre-First Doctor incarnation now, and
>> right or wrong - or until it's rewritten by another Doctor Who
>> showrunner at some stage in the future - that is the way it is.
>
> There are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
>
>> Doctor Ruth/The Fugitive Doctor exists in episodes of Doctor Who as
>> broadcast on BBC1 and has her own range of Big Finish audio
>> adventures coming next year, licensed and approved by the BBC.
>
> Big Finish is not canon and neither is Doctor Ruth, unless you mean
> the psychologist.
>
>> All of which is as official as you can get! So anyone trying to
>
> Officially non-canon.

I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>> claim that there are no pre-Hartnell incarnations are basically
>> just wasting their time and/or smoking hopium.
>
> The ones claiming incarnations before Hartnell are hallucinating and
> smoking opium.

I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!

> No one in their right mind could be stupid enough to believe a
> totally insane conspiracy theory that completely erases the character
> of the Doctor and replaces him with a monster based on Doomsday.

I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!

> And now with the bigeneration bullshit attached to it it's become
> even more incredulous, unbelievable, and unacceptable.

Classic WHO had The Watcher (??) who merged with DoctorTom to regenerate
into DoctorPeter.

Why couldn't such a thing have happened before, so keeping the numbers
of 'Time Lords' to a reasonable number??

> Doctor Who ended in 2017.

So WHAT have you, Aggy, been watching since then??
--
Daniel

solar penguin wrote on 25/4/24 9:43 pm:
> Daniel declared:
>> The Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 9:18 pm:
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>> Only retribates caanot clue in!
>>
>> "retribates"???
>
> And "caanot"??
>
Ah!! Yes! Maybe I didn't get that far into the asswipe's
gobble-de-gook!! ;-p
--
Daniel

On 26/04/2024 06:36, Daniel70 wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 7:45 am:
>> On 25/04/2024 15:01, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Terrance Dicks wrote the original script and wrote the novelization.
>>>>
>>>> Terrance Dicks disowned the script - the story was saw was a compete
>>>> rewrite by Robert Holmes.
>>>
>>> The thing is, we can discuss the "Brain of Morbius" all day long,
>>> (all week long even) but the simple fact is, whether Agamemnon
>>> likes it or not, is that Chris Chibnall (wherever he got the idea
>>> from) liked the idea of pre-Hartnell incarnations
>>
>> He got the idea from DC Comics in order to turn the Doctor into
>> Doomsday.
>>
>>> of the Doctor. And as Executive Producer of Doctor Who he decided
>>> to incorporate that idea in to his vision of the show in 2020. So
>>> whilst it's fun to debate the ins and outs of 1976, it doesn't
>>> change the lore of Doctor Who that we have now in 2024.
>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>
> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>

Nor can TV. Doctor Who ended in 2017. Nothing after that is canon.

>>> Doctor Who history features a pre-First Doctor incarnation now, and
>>> right or wrong - or until it's rewritten by another Doctor Who
>>> showrunner at some stage in the future - that is the way it is.
>>
>> There are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
>>
>>> Doctor Ruth/The Fugitive Doctor exists in episodes of Doctor Who as
>>> broadcast on BBC1 and has her own range of Big Finish audio
>>> adventures coming next year, licensed and approved by the BBC.
>>
>> Big Finish is not canon and neither is Doctor Ruth, unless you mean
>> the psychologist.
>>
>>> All of which is as official as you can get! So anyone trying to
>>
>> Officially non-canon.
>
> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>
>>> claim that there are no pre-Hartnell incarnations are basically just
>>> wasting their time and/or smoking hopium.
>>
>> The ones claiming incarnations before Hartnell are hallucinating and
>> smoking opium.
>
> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>> No one in their right mind could be stupid enough to believe a
>> totally insane conspiracy theory that completely erases the character
>> of the Doctor and replaces him with a monster based on Doomsday.
>
> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>> And now with the bigeneration bullshit attached to it it's become
>> even more incredulous, unbelievable, and unacceptable.
>
> Classic WHO had The Watcher (??) who merged with DoctorTom to regenerate
> into DoctorPeter.

The Watcher was a psychic projection of the Doctor and this goes all the
way back to Planet of the Spiders.

>
> Why couldn't such a thing have happened before, so keeping the numbers
> of 'Time Lords' to a reasonable number??
>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>
> So WHAT have you, Aggy, been watching since then??

Not Doctor Who.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 25/04/2024 14:22, Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
> > Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
> > Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
> > your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>
> He's got something useful to contribute. Retcon the Timeless
> Child.

Only people with no life would waste their time campaigning for
something that's not going to happen... well, not in the
immediate future anyway.

> Then there might be a possibility of Doctor Who
> returning to out screens in place of the stupid and
> nonsensical Bugs Bunny inspired Adventures of the Timeless
> Child monster cartoon, circus mallets and all, that RTD and
> the BBC have replaced it with.

"Chibnall out" they cried, because he dared to cast a female as
the Doctor. Then RTD came back, "hurrah" they said. But then RTD
cast a gay man as the Doctor... now they say, sack RTD!

The good news is, Doctor Who returns in two weeks time.

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0okzrozj0d8na003@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Idlehands wrote:
> >> On 2024-04-24 1:27 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
> >> > every. No one one can watch it at all.
> >>
> >> Well except for those millions of viewers, don't forget
> >> about them.
> >
> > These types of self-entitled fans believe it's only about
> > their opinion, Doctor Who should be made for THEM.
> >
> > But ignoring the millions that do watch Doctor Who now, even
> > Agamemnon still watches it! So Doctor Who finished in 2017,
> > nobody watches it... but he still tunes in to watch every new
> > episode. <face palm>
>
> Well, does anyone has stats to back their statement?

Yes Dave, there are plenty of stats that back up the fact that
millions of people watch episodes of Doctor Who... some people
call them ratings though!

On 26/04/2024 12:18, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 25/04/2024 14:22, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>
>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
>>> your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>> He's got something useful to contribute. Retcon the Timeless
>> Child.
>
> Only people with no life would waste their time campaigning for
> something that's not going to happen... well, not in the
> immediate future anyway.
>

If the BBC want to resurrect Doctor Who and start making money from it
again then the Timeless Child monster has to go.

>> Then there might be a possibility of Doctor Who
>> returning to out screens in place of the stupid and
>> nonsensical Bugs Bunny inspired Adventures of the Timeless
>> Child monster cartoon, circus mallets and all, that RTD and
>> the BBC have replaced it with.
>
> "Chibnall out" they cried, because he dared to cast a female as
> the Doctor. Then RTD came back, "hurrah" they said. But then RTD
> cast a gay man as the Doctor... now they say, sack RTD!
>
> The good news is, Doctor Who returns in two weeks time.
>

No it doesn't. Doctor Who ended in 2017.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <v0fbsu$3gce4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Opps!!
>

Just adding to your post count?

>Blueshirt wrote on 25/4/24 11:22 pm:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>
>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>
>>> IYIO
>>
>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>> logical response?
>
>Perhaps the asswipe is trying to suggest that I (Daniel) should have
>suggested to Aggy that He (Aggy) should have posted "... In Your
>Informed Opinion (IYIO), No one one can watch it at all." when, in fact,
>what I had thought Aggy should have posted was "In My Informed Opinion
>(IMHO), No one one can watch it at all"
>
>I think!! ..... Maybe/Perhaps!! Owww!! My head hurts!! Is that a sign of
>trying to LOGICALLY follow what the asswipe types??
>
>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>> Agamemnon.
>
>Hey!! But have you noticed, Blueshirt?? For sooooo long, Aggy seemed to
>ignore the asswipe but, now, Aggy is actually responding to the &
>DIRECTLY!! My, how times have changed!!
>
>> If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>Or, didn't he have an (On-line) Animal Farm or something?? (On-line,
>because no one in their right mind would let the & NEAR any real
>animals!!)

3 cats enjoying home life here and not street life.

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0fc7g$3gec3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 12:14 pm:
>> On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for
>>>>>>> every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
>>>>>> or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>>>>>
>>>>> IYIO
>>>>
>>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>>> logical response?
>>>>
>>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with your
>>>> time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>>
>>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>>
>> Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot remain
>> silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest in peace.
>>
>If people were making reasonable, intellectual, responses to the posts
>here, fair enough, but if people are just posting dribble so as to
>increase their All-Important Post Count (and to piss everybody else off
>of course), well I, for one, wish they'd stop!!

Just because you differ !!!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0fcfq$3ggkb$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 26/4/24 2:11 pm:
>> On 2024-04-25 8:14 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 25/04/2024 22:48, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <v0d8g9$2u99b$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
>>>>>> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it
>>>>>>>> for every. No one one can watch it at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the
>>>>>>> "IMHO" or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE
>>>>>>> WATCHING!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IYIO
>>>>>
>>>>> What a stupid response. Why do you - a grown man - have to act
>>>>> like an imbecile all the time? Episodes of Doctor Who get
>>>>> viewers in the multiple millions, so when Daniel says "People
>>>>> are watching", that is clearly a fact. So how can IYIO be a
>>>>> logical response?
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
>>>>> your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>>>
>>>> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.
>>>
>>> Doctor Who's corpse is being defiled by RTD and people cannot
>>> remain silent. Even in death the Doctor cannot be allowed to rest
>>> in peace.
>>
>> Dear sweet lord get a life already! Doctor Who is a fictional
>> character, fictional, fictional. What part of fictional is confusing
>> you?
>>
>> Neither alive nor dead, in fact does not exist so give it a rest and
>> go find another obsession.
>>
>> Sheesh.
>>
>No, for a change I think you, Idlehands, are incorrect. Doctor Who does
>exist .... at least in peoples minds .... but some of these minds are
>pretty stuffed, so cannot handle what their eyes tell them!! IMHO, of
>course!

Idlehands ever correct?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0fcts$3giov$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 12:08 pm:
>> On 25/04/2024 10:41, Daniel70 wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
>>>> On 22/04/2024 11:21, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote on 21/4/24 11:11 am:
>>>>>> On 19/04/2024 22:39, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <Snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fan fic as a term doesn't automatically make something bad or
>>>>>>> wrong. I've read some good fan fic over the years. I'd also
>>>>>>> consider most of what Big Finish produce as fan fic, just
>>>>>>> licensed by the BBC and released on audio... and a lot of it is
>>>>>>> very good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Being fair I suppose that's what any Doctor Who is really when
>>>>>>> it all boils down to it if a fan of the show is the Executive
>>>>>>> Producer... it's their ideas and their vision of the show. Just
>>>>>>> like it would be yours or mine if we were writing our ideas
>>>>>>> down on paper. The only difference is, they are paid by the BBC
>>>>>>> which makes their ideas legitimately part of the show.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's fan fic if it's written in order to entertain fans instead
>>>>>> of the general audience
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there really any such thing as 'the general audience"??
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, anybody could watch a program once or twice, three times
>>>>> even, but if they keep coming back again and again and again and
>>>>> again, aren't they, then, really, FANS??
>>>>>
>>>>>> or just one group of fans or one fan or fake fan alone as in the
>>>>>> case of Chibnall who utterly despised the show
>>>>>
>>>>> "utterly despised the show"?? REALLY?? If someone 'utterly despised
>>>>> a show', couldn't they just STOP watching it?? Or are they strapped
>>>>> into a chair with toothpicks keeping their eyes open??
>>>>
>>>> Chibnall hated Doctor Who so much that he destroyed it for every. No
>>>> one one can watch it at all.
>>>>
>>> Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO" or
>>> something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE *ARE* WATCHING!!
>>
>> Since Doctor Who ended in 2017 how can anyone possibly be watching?
>> Unless it's old episodes.
>
>But, have you noticed, Aggy, PEOPLE *ARE* WATCHING, maybe not in the
>numbers you would like, at least what *THEY* think *is* "Doctor Who"
>.... just like people might think they are watching "JAMES BOND 007", no
>matter WHO is portraying the LEAD CHARACTER, Aggy!!

Oh?

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0fehl$3gsdr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 7:45 am:
>> On 25/04/2024 15:01, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Terrance Dicks wrote the original script and wrote the
>>>>> novelization.
>>>>
>>>> Terrance Dicks disowned the script - the story was saw was a
>>>> compete rewrite by Robert Holmes.
>>>
>>> The thing is, we can discuss the "Brain of Morbius" all day long,
>>> (all week long even) but the simple fact is, whether Agamemnon
>>> likes it or not, is that Chris Chibnall (wherever he got the idea
>>> from) liked the idea of pre-Hartnell incarnations
>>
>> He got the idea from DC Comics in order to turn the Doctor into
>> Doomsday.
>>
>>> of the Doctor. And as Executive Producer of Doctor Who he decided
>>> to incorporate that idea in to his vision of the show in 2020. So
>>> whilst it's fun to debate the ins and outs of 1976, it doesn't
>>> change the lore of Doctor Who that we have now in 2024.
>>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>
>I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>>> Doctor Who history features a pre-First Doctor incarnation now, and
>>> right or wrong - or until it's rewritten by another Doctor Who
>>> showrunner at some stage in the future - that is the way it is.
>>
>> There are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
>>
>>> Doctor Ruth/The Fugitive Doctor exists in episodes of Doctor Who as
>>> broadcast on BBC1 and has her own range of Big Finish audio
>>> adventures coming next year, licensed and approved by the BBC.
>>
>> Big Finish is not canon and neither is Doctor Ruth, unless you mean
>> the psychologist.
>>
>>> All of which is as official as you can get! So anyone trying to
>>
>> Officially non-canon.
>
>I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>
>>> claim that there are no pre-Hartnell incarnations are basically
>>> just wasting their time and/or smoking hopium.
>>
>> The ones claiming incarnations before Hartnell are hallucinating and
>> smoking opium.
>
>I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>> No one in their right mind could be stupid enough to believe a
>> totally insane conspiracy theory that completely erases the character
>> of the Doctor and replaces him with a monster based on Doomsday.
>
>I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>
>> And now with the bigeneration bullshit attached to it it's become
>> even more incredulous, unbelievable, and unacceptable.
>
>Classic WHO had The Watcher (??) who merged with DoctorTom to regenerate
>into DoctorPeter.
>
>Why couldn't such a thing have happened before, so keeping the numbers
>of 'Time Lords' to a reasonable number??
>
>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>
>So WHAT have you, Aggy, been watching since then??

The Timeless Child is not Doctor Who!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0fsl9$3kccd$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 26/04/2024 06:36, Daniel70 wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote on 26/4/24 7:45 am:
>>> On 25/04/2024 15:01, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The Last Doctor wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terrance Dicks wrote the original script and wrote the novelization.
>>>>>
>>>>> Terrance Dicks disowned the script - the story was saw was a compete
>>>>> rewrite by Robert Holmes.
>>>>
>>>> The thing is, we can discuss the "Brain of Morbius" all day long,
>>>> (all week long even) but the simple fact is, whether Agamemnon
>>>> likes it or not, is that Chris Chibnall (wherever he got the idea
>>>> from) liked the idea of pre-Hartnell incarnations
>>>
>>> He got the idea from DC Comics in order to turn the Doctor into
>>> Doomsday.
>>>
>>>> of the Doctor. And as Executive Producer of Doctor Who he decided
>>>> to incorporate that idea in to his vision of the show in 2020. So
>>>> whilst it's fun to debate the ins and outs of 1976, it doesn't
>>>> change the lore of Doctor Who that we have now in 2024.
>>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>>
>> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>
>
>Nor can TV. Doctor Who ended in 2017. Nothing after that is canon.
>
>>>> Doctor Who history features a pre-First Doctor incarnation now, and
>>>> right or wrong - or until it's rewritten by another Doctor Who
>>>> showrunner at some stage in the future - that is the way it is.
>>>
>>> There are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.
>>>
>>>> Doctor Ruth/The Fugitive Doctor exists in episodes of Doctor Who as
>>>> broadcast on BBC1 and has her own range of Big Finish audio
>>>> adventures coming next year, licensed and approved by the BBC.
>>>
>>> Big Finish is not canon and neither is Doctor Ruth, unless you mean
>>> the psychologist.
>>>
>>>> All of which is as official as you can get! So anyone trying to
>>>
>>> Officially non-canon.
>>
>> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>>
>>>> claim that there are no pre-Hartnell incarnations are basically just
>>>> wasting their time and/or smoking hopium.
>>>
>>> The ones claiming incarnations before Hartnell are hallucinating and
>>> smoking opium.
>>
>> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>
>>> No one in their right mind could be stupid enough to believe a
>>> totally insane conspiracy theory that completely erases the character
>>> of the Doctor and replaces him with a monster based on Doomsday.
>>
>> I thought, basically, Canon *IS* whatever appears on T.V.!
>> Books/Comic/Whatever can ADD to Canon BUT can *NEVER* contradict Canon!!
>>
>>> And now with the bigeneration bullshit attached to it it's become
>>> even more incredulous, unbelievable, and unacceptable.
>>
>> Classic WHO had The Watcher (??) who merged with DoctorTom to regenerate
>> into DoctorPeter.
>
>The Watcher was a psychic projection of the Doctor and this goes all the
>way back to Planet of the Spiders.
>
>>
>> Why couldn't such a thing have happened before, so keeping the numbers
>> of 'Time Lords' to a reasonable number??
>>
>>> Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>>
>> So WHAT have you, Aggy, been watching since then??
>
>Not Doctor Who.
>

Maybe it it the Timeless child.

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <xn0ol14jkkdgo7q000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 25/04/2024 14:22, Blueshirt wrote:
>> >
>> > Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>> > Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>> > Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
>> > your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>
>> He's got something useful to contribute. Retcon the Timeless
>> Child.
>
>Only people with no life would waste their time campaigning for
>something that's not going to happen... well, not in the
>immediate future anyway.
>
>> Then there might be a possibility of Doctor Who
>> returning to out screens in place of the stupid and
>> nonsensical Bugs Bunny inspired Adventures of the Timeless
>> Child monster cartoon, circus mallets and all, that RTD and
>> the BBC have replaced it with.
>
>"Chibnall out" they cried, because he dared to cast a female as
>the Doctor. Then RTD came back, "hurrah" they said. But then RTD
>cast a gay man as the Doctor... now they say, sack RTD!
>
>The good news is, Doctor Who returns in two weeks time.
>

Sack RTD? Who is saying that.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

In article <v0g36b$3lpuo$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 26/04/2024 12:18, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/04/2024 14:22, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
>>>> Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
>>>> Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
>>>> your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>>>
>>> He's got something useful to contribute. Retcon the Timeless
>>> Child.
>>
>> Only people with no life would waste their time campaigning for
>> something that's not going to happen... well, not in the
>> immediate future anyway.
>>
>
>If the BBC want to resurrect Doctor Who and start making money from it
>again then the Timeless Child monster has to go.
>

And retconned!

>>> Then there might be a possibility of Doctor Who
>>> returning to out screens in place of the stupid and
>>> nonsensical Bugs Bunny inspired Adventures of the Timeless
>>> Child monster cartoon, circus mallets and all, that RTD and
>>> the BBC have replaced it with.
>>
>> "Chibnall out" they cried, because he dared to cast a female as
>> the Doctor. Then RTD came back, "hurrah" they said. But then RTD
>> cast a gay man as the Doctor... now they say, sack RTD!
>>
>> The good news is, Doctor Who returns in two weeks time.
>>
>
>No it doesn't. Doctor Who ended in 2017.
>
>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 25/04/2024 15:01, Blueshirt wrote:
>
> > Doctor Who history features a pre-First Doctor incarnation
> > now, and right or wrong - or until it's rewritten by another
> > Doctor Who showrunner at some stage in the future - that is
> > the way it is.
>
> There are no incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell.

Apart from the one that appeared in Doctor Who recently of
course.

I know it must hurt, but unfortunately it is part of the show.

Don't shoot the messenger!
> > Doctor Ruth/The Fugitive Doctor exists in episodes of Doctor
> > Who as broadcast on BBC1 and has her own range of Big Finish
> > audio adventures coming next year, licensed and approved by
> > the BBC.
>
> Big Finish is not canon and neither is Doctor Ruth, unless you
> mean the psychologist.
>
> Officially non-canon.

There is no official Doctor Who canon. So therefore there can be
no official non-canon. BUT, if there was such a thing as Doctor
Who canon, the Fugitive Doctor would be considered part of it!
As the people who do claim there is a canon usually mean what is
seen on-screen in an episode of Doctor Who.
> The ones claiming incarnations before Hartnell are
> hallucinating and smoking opium.

Or they have watched Doctor Who in recent years and seen a
pre-Hartnell incarnation.
> No one in their right mind could be stupid enough to believe a
> totally insane conspiracy theory that completely erases the
> character of the Doctor and replaces him with a monster based
> on Doomsday.

Well, it is a bit weird and definitely poorly conceived but the
simple fact is, it's there.

> And now with the bigeneration bullshit attached to it it's
> become even more incredulous, unbelievable,

But you can believe in an alien that can change his face, his
gender, his skin colour, can travel around time and space in a
blue wooden box...that's bigger on the outside, and fights
pepper-pots on wheels (with men inside) to save the universe?!

WELL THAT'S ALRIGHT THEN!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0okzt8ij2gdzn007@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >
> > Stop being an idiot Dave, you are not impressing your buddy
> > Agamemnon. If you've nothing useful to contribute to a proper
> > Doctor Who discussion, go and do something more useful with
> > your time instead. Like playing with the traffic...
>
> WEll if you do not like it, simply do not reply.

Yes Dave, you really don't have to.

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 25/04/2024 10:41, Daniel70 wrote:
> > The True Doctor wrote on 25/4/24 5:27 am:
> >
> > Sorry, Aggy, but I think you might have forgotten the "IMHO"
> > or something!! I mean, obviously PEOPLE ARE WATCHING!!
>
> Since Doctor Who ended in 2017 how can anyone possibly be
> watching? Unless it's old episodes.

But you watched it! You've posted your thoughts on every episode
of Doctor Who broadcast since 2017! So clearly your grasp of
reality has gone awry, or something...

Says nobody watches it, but then watches it!

How can anyone take you seriously?