The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oj1fac6ng02k000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Last Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
> >> > On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >> Mickmane wrote:
> >> >>> Oh, now I wonder who Peter Osgood was.
> >> >
> >> >> He was my boyhood hero! :-)
> >> >
> >> > You're being cryptic.
> >>
> >> A football (soccer) player for Chelsea and England in the
> >> 1960s and 1970s.
> >
> > The only Osgood that matters!
>
> CLARA!!

<face palm>

Try again Dave!!!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > Mickmane wrote:
> >
> >> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
> >> >> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >>
> >> >>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
> >> >>>
> >> >> I should maybe ask google who that is.
> >> >
> >> > A Spider-Man villain.
> >>
> >> Ah! Thanks. :)
> >>
> >> Not sure if I watched that movie.
> >
> > Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
> > movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
> > famous enough!
>
> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!

The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)

(As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
anyway.)

In article <xn0oj1kr46us44x000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <usc3mo$104ag$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> >Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> >> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >>> Mickmane wrote:
>> >>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>>>> Osborn? Wasn't that some UNIT employee, that then had 2
>> >>>>>> versions, and they didn't tell which one was
>> >>>>>> whatstheirname copy of the original?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> That was Osgood... like Peter!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Oh, now I wonder who Peter Osgood was.
>> >>
>> >>> He was my boyhood hero! :-)
>> >>
>> >> You're being cryptic.
>> >
>> > A football (soccer) player for Chelsea and England in the
>> > 1960s and 1970s.
>>
>> A good man!
>
>Well... I didn't know him personally but he played for the right
>football club so that's all that matters! :-)

As long as He did not play for

Millwall
Man U
Man C
Liverpoool
Everton
Aston Villa
Birm C
Sheff U
Sheff W

That is all that matters!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oj1ksq6uugkv001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oj1fac6ng02k000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > The Last Doctor wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> >> > On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >> >> Mickmane wrote:
>> >> >>> Oh, now I wonder who Peter Osgood was.
>> >> >
>> >> >> He was my boyhood hero! :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > You're being cryptic.
>> >>
>> >> A football (soccer) player for Chelsea and England in the
>> >> 1960s and 1970s.
>> >
>> > The only Osgood that matters!
>>
>> CLARA!!
>
><face palm>
>
>Try again Dave!!!

You missed the humour!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> > Mickmane wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> >> >> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>> >> >
>> >> > A Spider-Man villain.
>> >>
>> >> Ah! Thanks. :)
>> >>
>> >> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>> >
>> > Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>> > movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>> > famous enough!
>>
>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>
>The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>
>(As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>anyway.)

1904s and 1950s of course!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

Binky bleated:

> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>
>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>> famous enough!
>>>
>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>
>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>
>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>> anyway.)
>
> 1904s and 1950s of course!

How many 1904s were there?

--
solar penguin

solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Binky bleated:
>
>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>
>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>
>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>
>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>> anyway.)
>>
>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>
> How many 1904s were there?
>

I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character created in
1962.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

In article <usdfr9$19lmr$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Binky bleated:
^^^^^

Watch the mouth Idlehands-mouth Peado SP!

>
>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>
>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>
>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>
>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>> anyway.)
>>
>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>
>How many 1904s were there?
>
>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
>>
>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>>
>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>
>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>
>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>> anyway.)
>>>
>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>
>> How many 1904s were there?
>>
>
>I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character created in
>1962.

And the Bat?

>
>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:
> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>
>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>
>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>>
>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>>> anyway.)
>>>>
>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>
>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>
>>
>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character created in
>> 1962.
>
> And the Bat?
>
>>
>> --
>> “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor
>
>
i'm right

In article <jfidnaHQLJzg53f4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>>>> anyway.)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>>
>>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a
>character created in
>>> 1962.
>>
>> And the Bat?
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> “The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” -
>the Doctor
>>
>>
>i'm right

About?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>
>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>
>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>>
>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>>> anyway.)
>>>>
>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>
>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>
>>
>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character created in
>> 1962.
>
> And the Bat?

There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and nothing even bat
like associated with Spider-Man. We were talking about Spider-Man, after
discussing Norman Osborn, who was the Green Goblin in Spider-Man
continuity, which we got to via a discussion on Goblins as seen in “The
Church on Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who connection at last!

So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats probably won’t
tell us about how many 1904s there were … which is what you were asked, as
you brought them up.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

The Last Doctor wrote on 8/3/24 9:34 pm:
> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>> <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the
>>>>>>>> Spider-Man movies. He was a very famous villain... but
>>>>>>>> obviously not famous enough!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing
>>>>>> Spider-Man)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those
>>>>>> storylines anyway.)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>>
>>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>
>>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character
>>> created in 1962.
>>
>> And the Bat?

So "Yellow Beard Yadallee" tries to deflect the conversation!!

> There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and nothing even
> bat like associated with Spider-Man. We were talking about
> Spider-Man, after discussing Norman Osborn, who was the Green Goblin
> in Spider-Man continuity, which we got to via a discussion on Goblins
> as seen in “The Church on Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who
> connection at last!
>
> So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats probably
> won’t tell us about how many 1904s there were … which is what you
> were asked, as you brought them up.
>
And, as usual, when "Yellow Beard Yadallee" is shoot down in flames with
FACTS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" runs away and hides!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 8/3/24 12:27 pm:
> In article <usdfr9$19lmr$1@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Binky bleated:
> ^^^^^
>
> Watch the mouth Idlehands-mouth Peado SP!

Why, asswipe?? YOU apparently DON'T take YOUR own advice, "Yellow Beard
Yadallee", si WHY should anyone else, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??

But YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" HAD to respond .... even if YOU,
"Yellow Beard Yadallee", didn't actually respond to the thread content,
"Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!

>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

<Snip>

>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>
>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>
>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>> anyway.)
>>>
>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>
>> How many 1904s were there?
>>
>> --
>> solar penguin
>
I'm guessing just the *ONE*, Solar Penguin. ;-P
--
Daniel

In article <usepka$1l05o$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
>>>>>>>> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
>>>>>>>> famous enough!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>>>> anyway.)
>>>>>
>>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>>
>>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character
>created in
>>> 1962.
>>
>> And the Bat?
>
>There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and nothing even bat
>like associated with Spider-Man. We were talking about Spider-Man, after
>discussing Norman Osborn, who was the Green Goblin in Spider-Man
>continuity, which we got to via a discussion on Goblins as seen in “The
>Church on Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who connection at last!
>
>So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats probably won’t
>tell us about how many 1904s there were … which is what you were asked, as
>you brought them up.
>

Well , Batman and Superman is older than Spiderman

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <useqnk$1l80n$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Last Doctor wrote on 8/3/24 9:34 pm:
>> The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
>>> <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Binky bleated:
>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>, Blueshirt
>>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article
>>>>>>>> <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Mickmane wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if I watched that movie.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the
>>>>>>>>> Spider-Man movies. He was a very famous villain... but
>>>>>>>>> obviously not famous enough!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing
>>>>>>> Spider-Man)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those
>>>>>>> storylines anyway.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>>>
>>>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>>
>>>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a character
>>>> created in 1962.
>>>
>>> And the Bat?
>
>So "Yellow Beard Yadallee" tries to deflect the conversation!!
>
>> There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and nothing even
>> bat like associated with Spider-Man. We were talking about
>> Spider-Man, after discussing Norman Osborn, who was the Green Goblin
>> in Spider-Man continuity, which we got to via a discussion on Goblins
>> as seen in “The Church on Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who
>> connection at last!
>>
>> So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats probably
>> won’t tell us about how many 1904s there were … which is what you
>> were asked, as you brought them up.
>>
>And, as usual, when "Yellow Beard Yadallee" is shoot down in flames with
>FACTS, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" runs away and hides!!

And red-bearded Dannyboy is clueless
about Batman and Superman being older than Spiderman.

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <user2e$1l9k0$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 8/3/24 12:27 pm:
>> In article <usdfr9$19lmr$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Binky bleated:
>> ^^^^^
>>
>> Watch the mouth Idlehands-mouth Peado SP!
>
>Why, a%e?? YOU apparently DON'T take YOUR own advice, "Yellow Beard
>Yadallee", si WHY should anyone else, "Yellow Beard Yadallee"??
>
>But YOU, "Yellow Beard Yadallee" HAD to respond .... even if YOU,
>"Yellow Beard Yadallee", didn't actually respond to the thread content,
>"Yellow Beard Yadallee"!!
>

Look hear Idlehands-mouth paedo Dannyboy,
report your self to the nearest constabulary!

>>>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <xn0oj1gts6pj34w000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>>>>> In movies and the 1960s TV show!!
>>>>>
>>>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing Spider-Man)
>>>>>
>>>>> (As everything else was pretty much based on those storylines
>>>>> anyway.)
>>>>
>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>
>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>
>>> --
>>> solar penguin
>>
>I'm guessing just the *ONE*, Solar Penguin. ;-P
>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Binky bleated:
> >>> In article <xn0oj1kvf6uycmy002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> >>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The comics first though, obviously. (The Amazing
> >>>> Spider-Man)
> >>>> As everything else was pretty much based on those
> >>>> storylines anyway.
> >>>
> >>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
> >>
> >> How many 1904s were there?
> >
> > I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a
> > character created in 1962.
>
> And the Bat?

Now now David, no need to try and move the goal posts because
you made a mistake! We was on about the Green Goblin, so
Spider-Man and Marvel. The Batman is entirely different... but
FWIW, he wasn't around in 1904 either!!!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <xn0oj1ksq6uugkv001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> > The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <xn0oj1fac6ng02k000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> >> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> > The Last Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
> >> >> > On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> >> >> >> Mickmane wrote:
> >> >> >>> Oh, now I wonder who Peter Osgood was.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> He was my boyhood hero! :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You're being cryptic.
> >> >>
> >> >> A football (soccer) player for Chelsea and England in the
> >> >> 1960s and 1970s.
> >> >
> >> > The only Osgood that matters!
> >>
> >> CLARA!!
> >
> > <face palm>
> >
> > Try again Dave!!!
>
> You missed the humour!

Did I? Well, please don't try risky things like that again so...
I am clearly not on your level when it comes to humour!

The Doctor wrote:

> In article <usepka$1l05o$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> >The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> >>
> >> And the Bat?
> >
> > There’s no superhero or supervillain called the Bat, and
> > nothing even bat like associated with Spider-Man. We were
> > talking about Spider-Man, after discussing Norman Osborn,
> > who was the Green Goblin in Spider-Man continuity, which we
> > got to via a discussion on Goblins as seen in “The Church on
> > Ruby Road”. Phew! Back to the Doctor Who connection at last!
> >
> > So nothing about the Bat is relevant, and pretty sure Bats
> > probably won’t tell us about how many 1904s there were …
> > which is what you were asked, as you brought them up.
>
> Well , Batman and Superman is older than Spiderman

Not 1904 old... and it's still irrelevant to the actual
discussion we were having. But that's what you do best isn't it?
Throw random stuff in to de-rail the discussions people are
having here.

If you want to do comic book stuff I'm fine with that. I'm a
comic book geek with boxes of the things from my childhood... so
let's go...

The idiot inquired:

> In article <usdidj$1a53m$1@dont-email.me>,
> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>> solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Binky bleated:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1904s and 1950s of course!
>>>
>>> How many 1904s were there?
>>>
>>
>> I don’t know but it’s hardly relevant to Spider-Man, a
>> character created in 1962.
>
> And the Bat?
>

The Bat was a silent film made in 1926, not 1904 or 1950.
(But if you swap the last digits of 1926, you get 1962, so
you’re almost close. But not really.)

--
solar penguin

On 08.03.24, The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Mickmane wrote:

>>>> Oh, now I wonder who Peter Osgood was.
>>
>>> He was my boyhood hero! :-)
>>
>> You're being cryptic.

> A football (soccer) player for Chelsea and England in the 1960s and
> 1970s.

Thanks. :)

I was born late 1971, and never had any interest in football (soccer) at
all.

--

Mickmane

On 08.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> Mickmane wrote:
>> On 05.03.24, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Mickmane <ATH@kruemel.org> wrote:
>>>> On 05.03.24, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

>>>>> Norman Osborn was the "Green Goblin".
>>>>>
>>>> I should maybe ask google who that is.
>>>
>>> A Spider-Man villain.
>>
>> Ah! Thanks. :)
>>
>> Not sure if I watched that movie.

> Well, the Marvel comics originally as well as the Spider-Man
> movies. He was a very famous villain... but obviously not
> famous enough!

I'm not sure I'd even heard about Superman, never mind Spiderman. :)

As a kid/teenager I read M.A.D. comics.

Some Asterix and Obelix when visiting relatives, there were also some
comics with Clever and Smart, I think.

Also read some Donald Duck & relatives/similar. Can't remember more...

Hm, does Wilhelm Busch stuff count as comic? ;P

--

Mickmane

On 04/03/2024 20:15, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>> The Church on Ruby Road was not entertaining in any way shape
>> or for. It was a degenerate woke lecture on homosexuality and
>> social services so as to rot people's minds so they don't
>> question anything, and sexually groom children.
>
> I get a bit worried about people who seem so obsessed with the
> sexual grooming of children that they examine episodes of a TV
> show specifically looking for evidence of it!!!

I get a bit worried when people working on shows made for children make
it so glaringly obvious. Woke perverts.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 05/03/2024 11:30, Blueshirt wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <xn0oixmgt2x87sn000@news.eternal-september.org>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Church on Ruby Road was not entertaining in any way
>>>> shape or for. It was a degenerate woke lecture on
>>>> homosexuality and social services so as to rot people's
>>>> minds so they don't question anything, and sexually groom
>>>> children.
>>>
>>> I get a bit worried about people who seem so obsessed with
>>> the sexual grooming of children that they examine episodes
>>> of a TV show specifically looking for evidence of it!!!
>>
>> Any proof?
>
> You can read can't you?
>
> One person here keeps mentioning sexual-grooming in relation to
> episodes of Doctor Who. Nobody else seems to have picked up on
> these elements in the show, so that person must be REALLY
> looking hard.

Have you watched YouTube recently? Almost every channel has picked up on
these woke perverts sexually grooming children. It's obvious that an
adult is not going to change their sexuality because of it, so it's
clear that these perverts are trying to groom children.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner