Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/2024 10:27, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 19/03/2024 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you'll find the 2023 Doctor Who specials were in
>>>>> UHD on the iPlayer... well, the BBC certainly announced
>>>>> they would be anyway.
>>>>
>>>> They were not in UHD for anyone wanting to watch them on a
>>>> PC. You don't even get normal Full HD on iPlayer.
>>>
>>> What set up do you have if you are not getting UHD on the
>>> iPlayer? (For the selected programmes that are filmed in UHD
>>> obviously!) Can your PC monitor - and internet connection -
>>> handle 4K streams?
>>
>> UHD is explicitly forbidden from being streamed on PCs by the
>> BBC on iPlayer. Do you even use it?
>
> Not in UHD as I do not have a 4K set-up. I get BBC1 naturally in
> HD on my TV, and the iPlayer in HD on my computer - and iPhone -
> with a VPN. Hence my comment "the BBC announced they was anyway"
> about Doctor Who being streamed in UHD. I'm only trying to help
> a grumpy old man!
>
> So, the problem isn't that Doctor Who is not made in 4K (it is)
> or the BBC don't stream it in 4K (they do), the problem is that
> you use a computer to watch television programmes and do not get
> the full quality because of it.
>
> As a licence payer, you should complain to the BBC about this
> terrible injustice.
>
>>> You are constantly reminding us that you pay for a UK TV
>>> licence, so e-mail BBC iPlayer support if you think you
>>> should be getting a better picture quality from your iPlayer
>>> streams.
>>
>> Why don't you actually do some research for a change.
>
> Because I was trying to be helpful and offer possible solutions
> for your and your UHD 'issue'. You could still e-mail BBC support
> and complain to them rather than moaning here all the time about
> every single thing.
>

iPlayer downloads and streams to PC in 720p, the minimum HD standard. It’s
not the BBC’s problem if Aggie refuses to watch television programmes on a
television.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

The Doctor wrote on 22/3/24 10:23 am:
> In article <xn0ojlah56e4v0400j@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <uth5de$25vjr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> On 21/03/2024 10:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You do have a unique view of the world I'll give you that!
>>>>
>>>> My view is the view of the majority and shared by renowned
>>>> Star Trek expert Robert Mayer Burnett. Watch him on YouTube.
>>>> Don't you have any real understanding of literature?
>>>
>>> BS is really a nutbar.
>>
>> A KJV bible-thumping Christian fundamentalist siding with a
>> person who's obsessed with sexual perversion, anal sex and child
>> grooming... I wonder what the connection there could be?!! <rubs
>> chin and thinks>
>
> I roast and nuke paedophiles!
>
Gee Whiz!! That must make the tasty!! ;-P
--
Daniel

Daniel65 wrote:

> Blueshirt wrote on 22/3/24 2:21 am:
> >
> > I don't need to! The Blueshirts are still in the FA Cup and I
> > know when the SF & Final is on... and it ain't May 11th.
>
> AH!! So that's why you use the nym 'Blueshirt' ... Your
> favourite team in 'the League' is known as 'the Blueshirts'!!

Basically yes. It originated in the soccer newsgroups many years
ago, RSS mainly. (It's the only one left with much traffic now.)
I went through a period of having different 'handles' for
different newsgroups ... each one relevant to the group. (It
seemed like good idea at the time!)

> Does that ALSO apply for Mrs Blueshirt?? i.e. she also follows
> 'the Blueshirts'.

Not quite... Mrs Blueshirt is obviously the wife of Blueshirt,
then we have Blueshirt Junior, Ms Blueshirt, Bunny Blueshirt,
Puss Puss Blueshirt (etc)...

In article <utjbsh$2pp80$2@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>The unTrue Doctor didn’t tell us the truth:
>
>> On 21/03/2024 15:11, Blueshirt wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 21/03/2024 10:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> S1 was about asylum seekers and persecuting sentient robots
>>>>>> (despite the imbecilic morons who wrote it still allowing
>>>>>> AI holograms and holographic doctors which are exactly the
>>>>>> same thing) and S2 was about illegal immigration, mental
>>>>>> illness, and attacking Donald Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do have a unique view of the world I'll give you that!
>>>>
>>>> My view is the view of the majority and shared by renowned
>>>> Star Trek expert Robert Mayer Burnett. Watch him on YouTube.
>>>> Don't you have any real understanding of literature?
>>>
>>> Nah, I have a funny feeling you are the only person with that
>>> particular take on everything.
>>
>> Then you are totally deluded. Watch YouTube. The majority of channels
>> say exactly that same thing that I am saying.
>>
>
>Liar! The majority of YouTube channels don’t say anything about
>Star Trek at all!
>
>A majority of channels in your feed may say the same as you,
>but that doesn’t mean anything. It’s just the algorithm doing
>what it does best.
>

Such are algorithms.

>--
>solar penguin

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0ojmfee7gha1e001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>
>No, that's why I kept them away from church!
>

As we suspected!

>On the balance of probabilities that is a potentially more
>dangerous situation than them watching a TV show on BBC1 at 7pm
>on a Saturday evening!

They watching BBC1 Sunday mornings and early afternoon.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>> > In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>> >The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>> >
>> > BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>
>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>> so that they can prey on them.
>
>He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>
>Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...

Yeah! Yeah!

Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <utjjos$2rimu$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Blueshirt wrote on 22/3/24 2:21 am:
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <xn0ojl359648smr009@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> What about FA Cup?
>>>>
>>>> Nope. That's not on either.
>>>
>>> Check again.
>>
>> I don't need to! The Blueshirts are still in the FA Cup and I
>> know when the SF & Final is on... and it ain't May 11th.
>>
>> Clown!
>>
>AH!! So that's why you use the nym 'Blueshirt' ... Your favourite team
>in 'the League' is known as 'the Blueshirts'!!
>
>Does that ALSO apply for Mrs Blueshirt?? i.e. she also follows 'the
>Blueshirts'.

Go Chelsea for the FA Cup!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0ojmg107hdyht001@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>solar penguin wrote:
>
>>
>> The unTrue Doctor didn’t tell us the truth:
>> >
>> > Then you are totally deluded. Watch YouTube. The majority of
>> > channels say exactly that same thing that I am saying.
>>
>> Liar! The majority of YouTube channels don’t say anything about
>> Star Trek at all!
>>
>> A majority of channels in your feed may say the same as you,
>> but that doesn’t mean anything. It’s just the algorithm doing
>> what it does best.
>
>That's basically it, the content you watch on YouTube is going
>to be the stuff that gets recommended to you on your YouTube
>'Home' feed... so you think every video featured agrees with
>your POV but that's the whole point of the algorithm!
>
>It would work the other way too. If all the YouTube content you
>watched was "Doctor Who is brilliant" (etc.) videos then similar
>content would come up on your feed. Why do supposedly clever
>people not understand this?
>
>Or that YouTube creators make sensationalist videos to make
>money? Very few people watch boring content, or will return to a
>creator's channel if all its output is dull and uninteresting.
>So create a headline video, get views. More views = more money.

Well then ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <utjk3n$2rkha$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 21/03/2024 10:27, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 19/03/2024 09:21, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think you'll find the 2023 Doctor Who specials were in
>>>>>> UHD on the iPlayer... well, the BBC certainly announced
>>>>>> they would be anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> They were not in UHD for anyone wanting to watch them on a
>>>>> PC. You don't even get normal Full HD on iPlayer.
>>>>
>>>> What set up do you have if you are not getting UHD on the
>>>> iPlayer? (For the selected programmes that are filmed in UHD
>>>> obviously!) Can your PC monitor - and internet connection -
>>>> handle 4K streams?
>>>
>>> UHD is explicitly forbidden from being streamed on PCs by the
>>> BBC on iPlayer. Do you even use it?
>>
>> Not in UHD as I do not have a 4K set-up. I get BBC1 naturally in
>> HD on my TV, and the iPlayer in HD on my computer - and iPhone -
>> with a VPN. Hence my comment "the BBC announced they was anyway"
>> about Doctor Who being streamed in UHD. I'm only trying to help
>> a grumpy old man!
>>
>> So, the problem isn't that Doctor Who is not made in 4K (it is)
>> or the BBC don't stream it in 4K (they do), the problem is that
>> you use a computer to watch television programmes and do not get
>> the full quality because of it.
>>
>> As a licence payer, you should complain to the BBC about this
>> terrible injustice.
>>
>>>> You are constantly reminding us that you pay for a UK TV
>>>> licence, so e-mail BBC iPlayer support if you think you
>>>> should be getting a better picture quality from your iPlayer
>>>> streams.
>>>
>>> Why don't you actually do some research for a change.
>>
>> Because I was trying to be helpful and offer possible solutions
>> for your and your UHD 'issue'. You could still e-mail BBC support
>> and complain to them rather than moaning here all the time about
>> every single thing.
>>
>
>iPlayer downloads and streams to PC in 720p, the minimum HD standard. It’s
>not the BBC’s problem if Aggie refuses to watch television programmes on a
>television.
>

Who here watch TV shows on a TV?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <utjk5f$2rimu$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 22/3/24 10:23 am:
>> In article <xn0ojlah56e4v0400j@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <uth5de$25vjr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>> On 21/03/2024 10:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do have a unique view of the world I'll give you that!
>>>>>
>>>>> My view is the view of the majority and shared by renowned
>>>>> Star Trek expert Robert Mayer Burnett. Watch him on YouTube.
>>>>> Don't you have any real understanding of literature?
>>>>
>>>> BS is really a nutbar.
>>>
>>> A KJV bible-thumping Christian fundamentalist siding with a
>>> person who's obsessed with sexual perversion, anal sex and child
>>> grooming... I wonder what the connection there could be?!! <rubs
>>> chin and thinks>
>>
>> I roast and nuke paedophiles!
>>
>Gee Whiz!! That must make the tasty!! ;-P

Poisonous :-P

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0ojmgbl7ht8oo002@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Daniel65 wrote:
>
>> Blueshirt wrote on 22/3/24 2:21 am:
>> >
>> > I don't need to! The Blueshirts are still in the FA Cup and I
>> > know when the SF & Final is on... and it ain't May 11th.
>>
>> AH!! So that's why you use the nym 'Blueshirt' ... Your
>> favourite team in 'the League' is known as 'the Blueshirts'!!
>
>Basically yes. It originated in the soccer newsgroups many years
>ago, RSS mainly. (It's the only one left with much traffic now.)
>I went through a period of having different 'handles' for
>different newsgroups ... each one relevant to the group. (It
>seemed like good idea at the time!)
>
>> Does that ALSO apply for Mrs Blueshirt?? i.e. she also follows
>> 'the Blueshirts'.
>
>Not quite... Mrs Blueshirt is obviously the wife of Blueshirt,
>then we have Blueshirt Junior, Ms Blueshirt, Bunny Blueshirt,
>Puss Puss Blueshirt (etc)...

Blue vs Red!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote:

>
> Go Chelsea for the FA Cup!

        _
       / )
___   / /__
   |-'    _)
   |      _)
   |      _)
___|-.____)

In article <xn0ojmrf17wv60m000@reader.xsnews.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>
>>
>> Go Chelsea for the FA Cup!
>
>         _
>        / )
> ___   / /__
>    |-'    _)
>    |      _)
>    |      _)
> ___|-.____)
>
>
>
>
>
>

What is that suppose to be?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-03-22 3:48 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> The Doctor wrote on 22/3/24 10:23 am:
>> In article <xn0ojlah56e4v0400j@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <uth5de$25vjr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>> On 21/03/2024 10:29, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do have a unique view of the world I'll give you that!
>>>>>
>>>>> My view is the view of the majority and shared by renowned
>>>>> Star Trek expert Robert Mayer Burnett. Watch him on YouTube.
>>>>> Don't you have any real understanding of literature?
>>>>
>>>> BS is really a nutbar.
>>>
>>> A KJV bible-thumping Christian fundamentalist siding with a
>>> person who's obsessed with sexual perversion, anal sex and child
>>> grooming... I wonder what the connection there could be?!! <rubs
>>> chin and thinks>
>>
>> I roast and nuke paedophiles!
>>
> Gee Whiz!! That must make the tasty!! ;-P

Binky wouldn't recognize a paedophile if he met one and he would run in
the opposite direction if one introduced himself to him.

But hiding behind his keyboard in mummy's basement he believes himself
to be a righteous warrior.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>
>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>
>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>
>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>
>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>
> Yeah! Yeah!
>
> Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?

Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams to
sexually groom children.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

On 2024-03-23 2:23 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
> On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>>
>>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>>
>>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>>
>>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>>
>>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>>
>> Yeah! Yeah!
>>
>> Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>
> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams to
> sexually groom children.
>

Your interpretation of history is almost hilarious, almost.

What you meant to say was that she was a bitter bit of baggage who
wanted to impose her version of Christianity on the British public and
sadly had a flock of sheep who followed her without question.

Speaking of sheep, perhaps if you had your coat sheared you would be
much happier.
--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

In article <utndo4$3rhuh$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>>
>>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>>
>>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>>
>>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>>
>>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>>
>> Yeah! Yeah!
>>
>> Ever caught the BBc2 doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>
>Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams to
>sexually groom children.
>

IIRC, I have all 3 parts.

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
> In article <utndo4$3rhuh$2@dont-email.me>,
> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>> Ever caught the BBc2 doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>>
>> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams to
>> sexually groom children.
>>
>
> IIRC, I have all 3 parts.

You have all 3 parts, do you?

A penis, a vagina and … an anus?

Have is not the word. Are, is the word. As long as you convert to more
basic terms.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

In article <utnvo3$3vhi4$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>> In article <utndo4$3rhuh$2@dont-email.me>,
>> The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>> Ever caught the BBc2 doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>>>
>>> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams to
>>> sexually groom children.
>>>
>>
>> IIRC, I have all 3 parts.
>
>You have all 3 parts, do you?
>
>A penis, a vagina and … an anus?
>
>Have is not the word. Are, is the word. As long as you convert to more
>basic terms.
>

Ever seen the 3 part documentary?

>--
>“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 23/03/2024 22:44, Idlehands wrote:
> On 2024-03-23 2:23 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>> On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>>>
>>>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>>>
>>>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>>>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>>>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>>>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>>>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>>>
>>> Yeah! Yeah!
>>>
>>> Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>>
>> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams
>> to sexually groom children.
>>
>
> Your interpretation of history is almost hilarious, almost.
>
> What you meant to say was that she was a bitter bit of baggage who
> wanted to impose her version of Christianity on the British public and
> sadly had a flock of sheep who followed her without question.
>

No Squealer, that is not what I meant to say. Even the BBC docudrama
about her attributed to her exactly the same motive. Perverts in the
entertainment industry were using BBC dramas to impose their sexual
agenda on children so that they would submit to them. Mary Whitehouse
and the people who supported her knew exactly who these perverts were
which included celebrities like Jimmy Saville, Stewart Hall, and Rolf
Harris.

> Speaking of sheep, perhaps if you had your coat sheared you would be
> much happier.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <utok6v$78c5$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 23/03/2024 22:44, Idlehands wrote:
>> On 2024-03-23 2:23 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>>>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>>>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>>>>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>>>>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>>>>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>>>>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>>>>
>>>> Yeah! Yeah!
>>>>
>>>> Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>>>
>>> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams
>>> to sexually groom children.
>>>
>>
>> Your interpretation of history is almost hilarious, almost.
>>
>> What you meant to say was that she was a bitter bit of baggage who
>> wanted to impose her version of Christianity on the British public and
>> sadly had a flock of sheep who followed her without question.
>>
>
>No Squealer, that is not what I meant to say. Even the BBC docudrama
>about her attributed to her exactly the same motive. Perverts in the
>entertainment industry were using BBC dramas to impose their sexual
>agenda on children so that they would submit to them. Mary Whitehouse
>and the people who supported her knew exactly who these perverts were
>which included celebrities like Jimmy Saville, Stewart Hall, and Rolf
>Harris.
>
>> Speaking of sheep, perhaps if you had your coat sheared you would be
>> much happier.
>

Lying Idlehands is the Devil INcaranate!!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

On 2024-03-24 1:19 a.m., The True Doctor wrote:
> On 23/03/2024 22:44, Idlehands wrote:
>> On 2024-03-23 2:23 p.m., The True Doctor wrote:
>>> On 22/03/2024 14:44, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> In article <xn0ojmfkj7gq62n003@reader.xsnews.nl>,
>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22/03/2024 03:18, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <utiosf$2i4ur$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> The True Doctor  <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why you let the deviants pray on your children obviously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BS believes all pulpit speakers are paedo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And yet he exposes his son to perverts pretending to entertain
>>>>>> children in order to lull them into a false sense of security
>>>>>> so that they can prey on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's 29, I think he can decide for himself if a family
>>>>> entertainment show is corrupting his mind ... or sexually
>>>>> grooming him! You don't need to be the moral judge for everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Believe it or not, some people are capable of thinking for
>>>>> themselves. If you want to be the next Mary Whitehouse go and
>>>>> set up your TV watching association and give us all some peace...
>>>>
>>>> Yeah! Yeah!
>>>>
>>>> Ever caught the BBc@ doc on Mary Whitehouse?
>>>
>>> Yes. She started out because a bunch of perverts were using BBC drams
>>> to sexually groom children.
>>>
>>
>> Your interpretation of history is almost hilarious, almost.
>>
>> What you meant to say was that she was a bitter bit of baggage who
>> wanted to impose her version of Christianity on the British public and
>> sadly had a flock of sheep who followed her without question.
>>
>
> No Squealer, that is not what I meant to say. Even the BBC docudrama
> about her attributed to her exactly the same motive. Perverts in the
> entertainment industry were using BBC dramas to impose their sexual
> agenda on children so that they would submit to them. Mary Whitehouse
> and the people who supported her knew exactly who these perverts were
> which included celebrities like Jimmy Saville, Stewart Hall, and Rolf
> Harris.
>
>> Speaking of sheep, perhaps if you had your coat sheared you would be
>> much happier.
>

I blush at your belief in my superior leadership and oratory skills but
then remember Squealer was a work of total fiction, much like your claim
of speaking for the "majority".

You continue to pound this particular drum like it means something when
in truth it's just blind obedience to the extreme right and their
agenda. Baaaaaaah goes the sheep

I would suggest you would be better off using your time to educate
yourself but that would be a waste of breath and time. Some people
cannot be educated, especially those convinced they are without a doubt,
right.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw