Idlehands wrote:
> On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/7/2024 15:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Angry man rant snipped]
>>>>>
>>>>> rec.arts.drwho shows it is the worst active newsgroup on
>>>>> Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> DeYadify... DeYadify... DeYadify...
>>>>
>>>> I can just imagine these three going around saying that
>>>> actually...
>>>>
>>>> https://shorturl.at/msvz5
>>>
>>> I wonder if Adam realizes that the thread he chose to go full
>>> Karen Mode on was one where Yads was kinda sorta on topic, and
>>> kinda sorta relevant to the groups that he cross-posted?
>>
>> I didn't see Dave's original post but yeah, it was a
>> surprisingly on topic post from him. There has been plenty of
>> other posts from Dave that would have been more deserving of a
>> rant.
>>
>>> Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see one post
>>> that cross-posted a reply.  All the other posts I see didn't
>>> cross-post.
>>
>> I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs his
>> own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>> newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>>
>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>
>> Don't we all! ;-)
>
> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny statement
> which really means very litte.
>
> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure how that
> computes?
>
> I love his spam policy:
>
> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email / usenet
> posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not be tolerated, NO
> EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will have their account
> terminated without warning, and without refund. "
>
> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it generates
> for his "staff".
>
> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>
>
i remember when you all said he didn't have a server ,
and here you're saying he doesn't use it right ,
what oil heads

On 2024-04-07 18:20:34 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> solar penguin wrote:
>> The idiot inquired:
>>>
>>> 1960s?
>>> 1970s?
>>> 1980s?
>>> 1990s?
>>> 2000s?
>>> 2010s?
>>> 2020s?
>>
>> All of the above!
>
> Every decade of the show had its highs and lows...
>
> But the best? For me, I'd have to go with the 1970's... Jon
> Pertwee and Tom Baker were 'my' Doctors and the 1970's contained
> a lot of my favourite Doctor Who episodes ever. The show was at
> its peak in the second half of that decade as the Fourth Doctor,
> with his floppy hat and long scarf, became the definitive
> Doctor. Sure, there were some poor stories in the 1970's too,
> just like in every era of Doctor Who, but overall nothing since
> has topped the peaks of that era.

To a large degree, the "favourite Doctor" often tends to be the one
people first started with and got hooked on the show. That's why Jon
Pertwee and Tom Baker are usually top of the list of long-time fans,
while David Tennant tops the list for "newbies". :-)

In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>1970s?
>1980s?

I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 07/04/2024 23:25, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
>>> 1960s?
>>> 1970s?
>>
>> 1970s
>>
>> We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke
>> crap that brought the series to its end in 2017.
>
> Definitely the best two Doctors.
>
> That doesn't mean that some of those 1970's Doctor Who stories
> didn't deal with the political issues of the day... we were
> children back then so we just enjoyed Doctor Who for what it was.

Back then the story always came first not a pile of hypocritical
degenerate woke virtue signalling to cover up the sexual grooming of
children by a bunch of far left perverts and bigots.

Doctor who was always about opposing and toppling tyranny and the
oppression of free thought, speech, and expression. Now Doctor Whoke is
exactly the opposite of everything it once stood for. The monsters
represented those that wanted to hurt and do harm to us and out families
and children. Now we must embrace the same hideous monsters and ones
even more sickening because they are simply misunderstood. That's woke
degeneracy for you because woke ideology is all about accepting
tyrannical oppression and thought control, not fighting it to regain
your freedom, and not challenging what is wrong and evil using logical
and rational arguments to discredit it, but to accept it without
questioning it with any kind of rigorous debate, or face cancellation
for blasphemy against its Marxist-Fascist principles which are based on
lies, false narratives, and misinformation.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> 1960s?
>> 1970s?
>> 1980s?
>> 1990s?
>> 2000s?
>> 2010s?
>> 2020s?
>
>The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
>Paul McGann in 1996.
>
>The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>

I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <Ubu357$2pcag$1@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>In article <uuu2cr$1qhp$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>1970s?
>>1980s?
>
>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>

The JN-T years.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okax24gt6vew000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
>> On 4/7/2024 15:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>> > Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > [Angry man rant snipped]
>> > >
>> > > rec.arts.drwho shows it is the worst active newsgroup on
>> > > Usenet.
>> >
>> > DeYadify... DeYadify... DeYadify...
>> >
>> > I can just imagine these three going around saying that
>> > actually...
>> >
>> > https://shorturl.at/msvz5
>>
>> I wonder if Adam realizes that the thread he chose to go full
>> Karen Mode on was one where Yads was kinda sorta on topic, and
>> kinda sorta relevant to the groups that he cross-posted?
>
>I didn't see Dave's original post but yeah, it was a
>surprisingly on topic post from him. There has been plenty of
>other posts from Dave that would have been more deserving of a
>rant.
>
>> Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see one post
>> that cross-posted a reply. All the other posts I see didn't
>> cross-post.
>
>I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs his
>own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>
>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>
>Don't we all! ;-)

6 is the max from cleanfeed!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <eMqdnSt1g-iAvI77nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote:
>> On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/7/2024 15:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Angry man rant snipped]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rec.arts.drwho shows it is the worst active newsgroup on
>>>>>> Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> DeYadify... DeYadify... DeYadify...
>>>>>
>>>>> I can just imagine these three going around saying that
>>>>> actually...
>>>>>
>>>>> https://shorturl.at/msvz5
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if Adam realizes that the thread he chose to go full
>>>> Karen Mode on was one where Yads was kinda sorta on topic, and
>>>> kinda sorta relevant to the groups that he cross-posted?
>>>
>>> I didn't see Dave's original post but yeah, it was a
>>> surprisingly on topic post from him. There has been plenty of
>>> other posts from Dave that would have been more deserving of a
>>> rant.
>>>
>>>> Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see one post
>>>> that cross-posted a reply.  All the other posts I see didn't
>>>> cross-post.
>>>
>>> I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs his
>>> own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>>> newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>>>
>>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>>
>>> Don't we all! ;-)
>>
>> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny statement
^^^^^ paedophile mouth in action!

>> which really means very litte.
>>
>> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure how that
>> computes?
>>
>> I love his spam policy:
>>
>> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email / usenet
>> posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not be tolerated, NO
>> EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will have their account
>> terminated without warning, and without refund. "
>>
>> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it generates
>> for his "staff".
>>
>> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>>
>>
>i remember when you all said he didn't have a server ,
>and here you're saying he doesn't use it right ,
>what oil heads

Idlehands live somewhere in 1000000BC .
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uuv7ui$31v10$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>On 2024-04-07 18:20:34 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>> solar penguin wrote:
>>> The idiot inquired:
>>>>
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>> 1980s?
>>>> 1990s?
>>>> 2000s?
>>>> 2010s?
>>>> 2020s?
>>>
>>> All of the above!
>>
>> Every decade of the show had its highs and lows...
>>
>> But the best? For me, I'd have to go with the 1970's... Jon
>> Pertwee and Tom Baker were 'my' Doctors and the 1970's contained
>> a lot of my favourite Doctor Who episodes ever. The show was at
>> its peak in the second half of that decade as the Fourth Doctor,
>> with his floppy hat and long scarf, became the definitive
>> Doctor. Sure, there were some poor stories in the 1970's too,
>> just like in every era of Doctor Who, but overall nothing since
>> has topped the peaks of that era.
>
>To a large degree, the "favourite Doctor" often tends to be the one
>people first started with and got hooked on the show. That's why Jon
>Pertwee and Tom Baker are usually top of the list of long-time fans,
>while David Tennant tops the list for "newbies". :-)
>

Hence the why question.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uuvmo1$38kov$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 07/04/2024 23:25, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/04/2024 13:08, The Doctor wrote:
>>>> 1960s?
>>>> 1970s?
>>>
>>> 1970s
>>>
>>> We has both Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker, and none of that woke
>>> crap that brought the series to its end in 2017.
>>
>> Definitely the best two Doctors.
>>
>> That doesn't mean that some of those 1970's Doctor Who stories
>> didn't deal with the political issues of the day... we were
>> children back then so we just enjoyed Doctor Who for what it was.
>
>Back then the story always came first not a pile of hypocritical
>degenerate woke virtue signalling to cover up the sexual grooming of
>children by a bunch of far left perverts and bigots.
>
>Doctor who was always about opposing and toppling tyranny and the
>oppression of free thought, speech, and expression. Now Doctor Whoke is
>exactly the opposite of everything it once stood for. The monsters
>represented those that wanted to hurt and do harm to us and out families
>and children. Now we must embrace the same hideous monsters and ones
>even more sickening because they are simply misunderstood. That's woke
>degeneracy for you because woke ideology is all about accepting
>tyrannical oppression and thought control, not fighting it to regain
>your freedom, and not challenging what is wrong and evil using logical
>and rational arguments to discredit it, but to accept it without
>questioning it with any kind of rigorous debate, or face cancellation
>for blasphemy against its Marxist-Fascist principles which are based on
>lies, false narratives, and misinformation.
>

Full agreed on how times have changed!

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

Idlehands wrote on 8/4/24 8:37 am:
> On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:

<Snip>

>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>
>> Don't we all! ;-)
>
> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny statement
> which really means very litte.
>
> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure how that
> computes?
>
> I love his spam policy:
>
> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email / usenet
> posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not be tolerated, NO
> EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will have their account
> terminated without warning, and without refund. "
>
> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it generates
> for his "staff".

But, when you realise that his "staff" is *ONE* .... and that *ONE* is
him, well .....

> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.

He's got to get his daily dose of ATTENTION somehow!!
--
Daniel

The Doctor wrote on 8/4/24 1:57 pm:
> In article <xn0okax24gt6vew000@post.eweka.nl>,
> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2024 15:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [Angry man rant snipped]
>>>>>
>>>>> rec.arts.drwho shows it is the worst active newsgroup on
>>>>> Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> DeYadify... DeYadify... DeYadify...
>>>>
>>>> I can just imagine these three going around saying that
>>>> actually...
>>>>
>>>> https://shorturl.at/msvz5
>>>
>>> I wonder if Adam realizes that the thread he chose to go full
>>> Karen Mode on was one where Yads was kinda sorta on topic, and
>>> kinda sorta relevant to the groups that he cross-posted?
>>
>> I didn't see Dave's original post but yeah, it was a
>> surprisingly on topic post from him. There has been plenty of
>> other posts from Dave that would have been more deserving of a
>> rant.
>>
>>> Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see one post
>>> that cross-posted a reply. All the other posts I see didn't
>>> cross-post.
>>
>> I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs his
>> own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>> newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>>
>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>
>> Don't we all! ;-)
>
> 6 is the max from cleanfeed!
>
WHAT?? The asswipe thinks we should all have SIX DRINKS!! REALLY??
--
Daniel

On 2024-04-08 4:13 a.m., Daniel65 wrote:
> Idlehands wrote on 8/4/24 8:37 am:
>> On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>
>>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>>
>>> Don't we all! ;-)
>>
>> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny statement
>> which really means very litte.
>>
>> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure how that
>> computes?
>>
>> I love his spam policy:
>>
>> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email / usenet
>> posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not be tolerated, NO
>> EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will have their account
>> terminated without warning, and without refund. "
>>
>> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it generates
>> for his "staff".
>
> But, when you realise that his "staff" is *ONE* .... and that  *ONE* is
> him, well .....
>
>> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>
> He's got to get his daily dose of ATTENTION somehow!!

I think he has a part-time school kid to take care of all the technical
work while he plays empire kred and farmville. But his "pictures" and
words make it sound like a major operation....

Based in mummy's basement.

--
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.

George Bernard Shaw

Your Name wrote:

> On 2024-04-07 18:20:34 +0000, Blueshirt said:
> >
> > But the best? For me, I'd have to go with the 1970's... Jon
> > Pertwee and Tom Baker were 'my' Doctors and the 1970's
> > contained a lot of my favourite Doctor Who episodes ever.
> > The show was at its peak in the second half of that decade
> > as the Fourth Doctor, with his floppy hat and long scarf,
> > became the definitive Doctor. Sure, there were some poor
> > stories in the 1970's too, just like in every era of Doctor
> > Who, but overall nothing since has topped the peaks of that
> > era.
>
> To a large degree, the "favourite Doctor" often tends to be
> the one people first started with and got hooked on the show.
> That's why Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker are usually top of the
> list of long-time fans,

Well, us oldies can't all be wrong.

After all, we could have said Sylvester McCoy!

> while David Tennant tops the list for "newbies".

David Tennant is near the top of my list too... certainly well
above some of the classic era Doctors.

% wrote:

> Idlehands wrote:
> > On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
> > > Hornplayer9599 wrote:
> > >
> > > > Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see
> > > > one post that cross-posted a reply.  All the other posts
> > > > I see didn't cross-post.
> > >
> > > I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs
> > > his own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
> > > newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
> >
> > Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny
> > statement which really means very litte.
> >
> > I love his spam policy:
> >
> > "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email /
> > usenet posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will
> > not be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming
> > will have their account terminated without warning, and
> > without refund. "
> >
> > He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it
> > generates for his "staff".
> >
> > Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
> >
> >
> i remember when you all said he didn't have a server ,
> and here you're saying he doesn't use it right ,
> what oil heads

We've always known Dave runs his own nntp server, if he didn't
someone would have sent off an abuse complaint to NotKnow Inc.
many years ago!

But as that e-mail would arrive at the inbox of the NotKnow news
admin, a Mr D.S Yadallee, and the object of the complaint would
be the abuse of Usenet by a Mr D.S Yadallee, there wouldn't be
much point in typing an e-mail of complaint out... so nobody has
bothered.

The True Doctor wrote:

> On 07/04/2024 23:25, Blueshirt wrote:
> >
> > That doesn't mean that some of those 1970's Doctor Who
> > stories didn't deal with the political issues of the day...
> > we were children back then so we just enjoyed Doctor Who for
> > what it was.
>
> Back then the story always came first not a pile of
> hypocritical degenerate woke virtue signalling to cover up the
> sexual grooming of children by a bunch of far left perverts
> and bigots.
>
> Doctor who was always about opposing and toppling tyranny and
> the oppression of free thought, speech, and expression. Now
> Doctor Whoke is exactly the opposite of everything it once
> stood for. The monsters represented those that wanted to hurt
> and do harm to us and out families and children. Now we must
> embrace the same hideous monsters and ones even more sickening
> because they are simply misunderstood. That's woke degeneracy
> for you because woke ideology is all about accepting
> tyrannical oppression and thought control, not fighting it to
> regain your freedom, and not challenging what is wrong and
> evil using logical and rational arguments to discredit it, but
> to accept it without questioning it with any kind of rigorous
> debate, or face cancellation for blasphemy against its
> Marxist-Fascist principles which are based on lies, false
> narratives, and misinformation.

You definitely shouldn't be watching S1/S14 next month. After
all, we wouldn't want you exposed to 'that sort of thing'. Maybe
you should join a library and take out a few books to pass the
time instead?

In article <uv0g0n$3ealp$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote on 8/4/24 8:37 am:
>> On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
><Snip>
>
>>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>>
>>> Don't we all! ;-)
>>
>> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny statement
>> which really means very litte.
>>
>> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure how that
>> computes?
>>
>> I love his spam policy:
>>
>> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email / usenet
>> posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not be tolerated, NO
>> EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will have their account
>> terminated without warning, and without refund. "
>>
>> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it generates
>> for his "staff".
>
>But, when you realise that his "staff" is *ONE* .... and that *ONE* is
>him, well .....
>
>> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>
>He's got to get his daily dose of ATTENTION somehow!!

Lying Idlehands is the worse attention whroe on Usenet!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uv0g5s$3ealp$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 8/4/24 1:57 pm:
>> In article <xn0okax24gt6vew000@post.eweka.nl>,
>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/2024 15:12, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Angry man rant snipped]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rec.arts.drwho shows it is the worst active newsgroup on
>>>>>> Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> DeYadify... DeYadify... DeYadify...
>>>>>
>>>>> I can just imagine these three going around saying that
>>>>> actually...
>>>>>
>>>>> https://shorturl.at/msvz5
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if Adam realizes that the thread he chose to go full
>>>> Karen Mode on was one where Yads was kinda sorta on topic, and
>>>> kinda sorta relevant to the groups that he cross-posted?
>>>
>>> I didn't see Dave's original post but yeah, it was a
>>> surprisingly on topic post from him. There has been plenty of
>>> other posts from Dave that would have been more deserving of a
>>> rant.
>>>
>>>> Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see one post
>>>> that cross-posted a reply. All the other posts I see didn't
>>>> cross-post.
>>>
>>> I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs his
>>> own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>>> newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>>>
>>>> Perhaps Adam just needs to have a drink and relax.
>>>
>>> Don't we all! ;-)
>>
>> 6 is the max from cleanfeed!
>>
>WHAT?? The a%e thinks we should all have SIX DRINKS!! REALLY??

I never said anything about 6 drinks!!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okbygohqvfbn000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Your Name wrote:
>
>> On 2024-04-07 18:20:34 +0000, Blueshirt said:
>> >
>> > But the best? For me, I'd have to go with the 1970's... Jon
>> > Pertwee and Tom Baker were 'my' Doctors and the 1970's
>> > contained a lot of my favourite Doctor Who episodes ever.
>> > The show was at its peak in the second half of that decade
>> > as the Fourth Doctor, with his floppy hat and long scarf,
>> > became the definitive Doctor. Sure, there were some poor
>> > stories in the 1970's too, just like in every era of Doctor
>> > Who, but overall nothing since has topped the peaks of that
>> > era.
>>
>> To a large degree, the "favourite Doctor" often tends to be
>> the one people first started with and got hooked on the show.
>> That's why Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker are usually top of the
>> list of long-time fans,
>
>Well, us oldies can't all be wrong.
>
>After all, we could have said Sylvester McCoy!

Sparking a flame?

>
>> while David Tennant tops the list for "newbies".
>
>David Tennant is near the top of my list too... certainly well
>above some of the classic era Doctors.

WEll ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okbyskhr7ekt001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>% wrote:
>
>> Idlehands wrote:
>> > On 2024-04-07 4:15 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
>> > > Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Speaking of cross-posting, as I write this I only see
>> > > > one post that cross-posted a reply.  All the other posts
>> > > > I see didn't cross-post.
>> > >
>> > > I did trim Dave's excessive cross-posting, but as he runs
>> > > his own nntp server I'm sure he'd say cross-posting to six
>> > > newsgroups is allowed in his TOS! :-)
>> >
>> > Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny
>> > statement which really means very litte.
>> >
>> > I love his spam policy:
>> >
>> > "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email /
>> > usenet posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will
>> > not be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming
>> > will have their account terminated without warning, and
>> > without refund. "
>> >
>> > He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it
>> > generates for his "staff".
>> >
>> > Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>> >
>> >
>> i remember when you all said he didn't have a server ,
>> and here you're saying he doesn't use it right ,
>> what oil heads
>
>We've always known Dave runs his own nntp server, if he didn't
>someone would have sent off an abuse complaint to NotKnow Inc.
>many years ago!
>
>But as that e-mail would arrive at the inbox of the NotKnow news
>admin, a Mr D.S Yadallee, and the object of the complaint would
>be the abuse of Usenet by a Mr D.S Yadallee, there wouldn't be
>much point in typing an e-mail of complaint out... so nobody has
>bothered.

Some logical. % how logical is that?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

Idlehands wrote:
>
> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny
> statement which really means very litte.
>
> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure
> how that computes?
>
> I love his spam policy:
>
> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email /
> usenet posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not
> be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will
> have their account terminated without warning, and without
> refund. "
>
> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it
> generates for his "staff".
>
> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.

Dave's cross-posting stops at six newsgroups as he knows most
filters will consider any more as spam and his post will get
blocked. My main news service frowns upon cross-posting unless
it is to a "relevant" newsgroup. But that then raises the
question, how do you define what is relevant? Is "Doctor Who" as
a topic relevant to a sci-fi newsgroup? For every person that
says it's not, another will say it is.

So it's up to each individual user to deal with those sort of
things their own way, be it killfiles, filters or angry rants...

On 08/04/2024 15:32, Blueshirt wrote:
> The True Doctor wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2024 23:25, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>
>>> That doesn't mean that some of those 1970's Doctor Who
>>> stories didn't deal with the political issues of the day...
>>> we were children back then so we just enjoyed Doctor Who for
>>> what it was.
>>
>> Back then the story always came first not a pile of
>> hypocritical degenerate woke virtue signalling to cover up the
>> sexual grooming of children by a bunch of far left perverts
>> and bigots.
>>
>> Doctor who was always about opposing and toppling tyranny and
>> the oppression of free thought, speech, and expression. Now
>> Doctor Whoke is exactly the opposite of everything it once
>> stood for. The monsters represented those that wanted to hurt
>> and do harm to us and out families and children. Now we must
>> embrace the same hideous monsters and ones even more sickening
>> because they are simply misunderstood. That's woke degeneracy
>> for you because woke ideology is all about accepting
>> tyrannical oppression and thought control, not fighting it to
>> regain your freedom, and not challenging what is wrong and
>> evil using logical and rational arguments to discredit it, but
>> to accept it without questioning it with any kind of rigorous
>> debate, or face cancellation for blasphemy against its
>> Marxist-Fascist principles which are based on lies, false
>> narratives, and misinformation.
>
> You definitely shouldn't be watching S1/S14 next month. After
> all, we wouldn't want you exposed to 'that sort of thing'. Maybe
> you should join a library and take out a few books to pass the
> time instead?

Children should not be watching the perversion that RTD has created, nor
should adults with low IQ. This woke shit is easily refuted by those
with intelligence, but the woke retards want to breed an entire
generation without any intelligence at all so they can turn the whole
world into Animal Farm.

--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw

"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner

In article <xn0okc0j3htkqut007@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Idlehands wrote:
>>
>> Binky's TOS have been reduced to a wishy washy sort of whiny
>> statement which really means very litte.
>>
>> His "Unlimited Access" is limited to 2 hours max....not sure
>> how that computes?
>>
>> I love his spam policy:
>>
>> "Email / Usenet (news) spam (unsolicited commercial email /
>> usenet posting OR Bulk mailing through our server ) will not
>> be tolerated, NO EXCEPTIONS! Users found to be spamming will
>> have their account terminated without warning, and without
>> refund. "
>>
>> He then drones on about how bad spam is and how much work it
>> generates for his "staff".
>>
>> Nothing about cross-posting, big surprise there.
>
>Dave's cross-posting stops at six newsgroups as he knows most
>filters will consider any more as spam and his post will get
>blocked. My main news service frowns upon cross-posting unless
>it is to a "relevant" newsgroup. But that then raises the
>question, how do you define what is relevant? Is "Doctor Who" as
>a topic relevant to a sci-fi newsgroup? For every person that
>says it's not, another will say it is.
>
>So it's up to each individual user to deal with those sort of
>things their own way, be it killfiles, filters or angry rants...

The key word is relevant, something
Paedophile Idlehands lacks understanding!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uv11rv$3ikel$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>On 08/04/2024 15:32, Blueshirt wrote:
>> The True Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/04/2024 23:25, Blueshirt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That doesn't mean that some of those 1970's Doctor Who
>>>> stories didn't deal with the political issues of the day...
>>>> we were children back then so we just enjoyed Doctor Who for
>>>> what it was.
>>>
>>> Back then the story always came first not a pile of
>>> hypocritical degenerate woke virtue signalling to cover up the
>>> sexual grooming of children by a bunch of far left perverts
>>> and bigots.
>>>
>>> Doctor who was always about opposing and toppling tyranny and
>>> the oppression of free thought, speech, and expression. Now
>>> Doctor Whoke is exactly the opposite of everything it once
>>> stood for. The monsters represented those that wanted to hurt
>>> and do harm to us and out families and children. Now we must
>>> embrace the same hideous monsters and ones even more sickening
>>> because they are simply misunderstood. That's woke degeneracy
>>> for you because woke ideology is all about accepting
>>> tyrannical oppression and thought control, not fighting it to
>>> regain your freedom, and not challenging what is wrong and
>>> evil using logical and rational arguments to discredit it, but
>>> to accept it without questioning it with any kind of rigorous
>>> debate, or face cancellation for blasphemy against its
>>> Marxist-Fascist principles which are based on lies, false
>>> narratives, and misinformation.
>>
>> You definitely shouldn't be watching S1/S14 next month. After
>> all, we wouldn't want you exposed to 'that sort of thing'. Maybe
>> you should join a library and take out a few books to pass the
>> time instead?
>
>Children should not be watching the perversion that RTD has created, nor
>should adults with low IQ. This woke shit is easily refuted by those
>with intelligence, but the woke retards want to breed an entire
>generation without any intelligence at all so they can turn the whole
>world into Animal Farm.
>

Will someone understand the point?

>--
>The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
>
>"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
>stands for." -William Shatner
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

> 1960s?

Seminal. The second best era of classic who. But in some ways it hasn’t
aged well, and a fair bit of it is still not reanimated.

> 1970s?

The entirety of the Third Doctor and all but the rather poorer tail end of
the Fourth? The pinnacle of classic Who and the best era so far of the
whole show.

> 1980s?

A distant third, the show was in continuous decline between 1980 and 1988
and the smallest of upticks in 1989 means that this is definitely the
weakest era of classic Who.

> 1990s?

The Wilderness Years. Dimensions in Time was the depths of cynical
exploitation of the franchise. The TV movie was - seriously flawed. The
Curse of Fatal Death was tremendous fun, but if any televised Who is
definitely non-canon, that is it. 1990s don’t even count as a decade for
the show.

> 2000s?

A fine comeback and the best decade - so far - of the revived series. On
balance, probably second only to the 1980s.

> 2010s?

A game of three parts. Each Doctor’s era was weaker than the one before -
but still, probably the third best decade overall, edging out the 1960s
only because it is so much more watchable now than the show from those
times, with the odd exception.

> 2020s?

Too soon to judge. Series 12 was mostly good. Series 13 was a hot mess. The
specials have been mostly good. Time will tell.

--
“The timelines and … canon … are rupturing” - the Doctor