John Hall wrote:

> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
> > doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> >>Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> > > > doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> >
> > > > > 1970s?
> > > > > 1980s?
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
> > >
> > > The JN-T years.
> >
> > I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>
> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

Most of it was. S18 was definitely in the 1980's though, and
possibly the last part of S17... but the glory days of Tom Baker
were the 1970's.

The early 80's were an okay time for Doctor Who though... Tom
was past his peak, but Peter Davison had some good stories. It
was around the middle of that decade where things went
off-kilter for Doctor Who.

anim8rfsk wrote:

> John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
> > In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> > <weberm@polaris.net> writes
> >> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> >> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The JN-T years.
> >>
> >> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
> >
> > Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
> 1974-1981

Also referred to as "the good old days" by us oldies!

On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>> wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>> The JN-T years.
>>
>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>
> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
first season was Tom Baker's last.

--

Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan

Hornplayer9599 wrote:

> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>
>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>
>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>
>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
> first season was Tom Baker's last.

For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with tennant
and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes seemed to be
taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes with all
the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought Capaldi was also
very good, but the storylines wernt.

mike

In article <LWAt+0A$KtFmFwaD@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
><weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>>1970s?
>>>>>1980s?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>>The JN-T years.
>>
>>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>
>Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

1974 to 1981

>--
>John Hall
> "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
> from coughing."
> Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okf0at14xul000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Arthur Lipscomb wrote:
>
>> On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> > In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
>> > John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its
>> > > take on the Master, who I have always felt should be
>> > > outwardly charming rather than hideous.
>> >
>> > What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
>>
>> I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial.
>> They exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would
>> have been a little more believable if the Master convinced the
>> Daleks to let him git rid of the Doctor for them and it was
>> all part of a joint plan. A throw away line could have fixed
>> that plot hole. Perhaps that was the plan all along but the
>> scene was cut for time.
>
>And they wasn't even Daleks... they were "Cadbury's Smash"
>aliens imitating Daleks!
>
>But no, Daleks wouldn't have put the Master on trial or ask the
>Doctor to collect his remains from Skaro and transport them to
>Gallifrey.

We all feel that way, the reall fans!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okf0kn1j7nk001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>John Hall wrote:
>
>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>> > doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> >>Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> > > > doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > 1970s?
>> > > > > 1980s?
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>> > >
>> > > The JN-T years.
>> >
>> > I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
>Most of it was. S18 was definitely in the 1980's though, and
>possibly the last part of S17... but the glory days of Tom Baker
>were the 1970's.
>
>The early 80's were an okay time for Doctor Who though... Tom
>was past his peak, but Peter Davison had some good stories. It
>was around the middle of that decade where things went
>off-kilter for Doctor Who.

Grade vs JN-T comes to mind.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okf0nf1n811002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>anim8rfsk wrote:
>
>> John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> > In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> > <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>> >> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>> >> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> The JN-T years.
>> >>
>> >> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>> >
>> > Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>> 1974-1981
>
>Also referred to as "the good old days" by us oldies!
>

Key owrd: Oldies!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <ec6f0e5d1becee8af9f4a45ee49a545d@www.novabbs.com>,
miked <dmike204@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>
>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous  <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>
>For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with tennant
>and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes seemed to be
>taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes with all
>the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought Capaldi was also
>very good, but the storylines wernt.
>
>mike

Capaldi under Moffat ...
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 11/4/24 9:20 am:

<Snip>

> Key owrd: Oldies!
>
"owrd"?? YOUR Spell-Checker working perfectly, there, asswipe!!
--
Daniel

miked wrote on 11/4/24 9:08 am:
> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> 1970s? 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>
> For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with
> tennant and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes
> seemed to be taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes
> with all the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought
> Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines wernt.

"I thought Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines weren't." ....
Ditto for Jodie, I think!!
--
Daniel

john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>>>>>1970s?
>>>>>1980s?
>>>>
>>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>
>>>The JN-T years.
>>
>>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>
>Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?

Late 1970's to the early 1980's.

--
Let's go Brandon!

In article <uv8d1b$1knqn$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>miked wrote on 11/4/24 9:08 am:
>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1970s? 1980s?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>
>>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>>
>> For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with
>> tennant and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes
>> seemed to be taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes
>> with all the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought
>> Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines wernt.
>
>"I thought Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines weren't." ....
>Ditto for Jodie, I think!!

The whole chibnall/Whittaker Era deserve a retcon!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uv8g7i$1l880$2@dont-email.me>,
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>>>>>1970s?
>>>>>>1980s?
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>
>>>>The JN-T years.
>>>
>>>I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>>Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
>Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
>

Mid 1970s to early 1980s.

>--
>Let's go Brandon!
>

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

The Doctor wrote on 11/4/24 9:57 pm:
> In article <uv8d1b$1knqn$1@dont-email.me>,
> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> miked wrote on 11/4/24 9:08 am:
>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1970s? 1980s?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>>
>>>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>>>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>>>
>>> For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with
>>> tennant and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes
>>> seemed to be taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes
>>> with all the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought
>>> Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines wernt.
>>
>> "I thought Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines weren't." ....
>> Ditto for Jodie, I think!!
>
> The whole chibnall/Whittaker Era deserve a retcon!

..... but we all know that ain't gunna happen!!
--
Daniel

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>
>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>
>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>
>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.

JINX you owe me ice cream

>
> --
> Let's go Brandon!
>
>

--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

On 4/11/2024 12:29 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
>
> JINX you owe me ice cream

The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
you first encounter the show.

pt

Cryptoengineer wrote:
>
> The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
> you first encounter the show.

I feel sorry for those that first encountered the show between
1987 & 1989 so...

Talk about arriving late to a party and finding it all over! ;-)

In article <uv8o5v$1msi8$4@dont-email.me>,
Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote on 11/4/24 9:57 pm:
>> In article <uv8d1b$1knqn$1@dont-email.me>,
>> Daniel65 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>> miked wrote on 11/4/24 9:08 am:
>>>> Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>> On 4/10/2024 12:56, John Hall wrote:
>>>>>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>>>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1970s? 1980s?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>>>
>>>>> For the most part, yes. But he was in the roll until 1981. JN-T's
>>>>> first season was Tom Baker's last.
>>>>
>>>> For me 1970s also, although the opener of the current series with
>>>> tennant and tate was brilliant. JP was my favorite, TB 2nd; sometimes
>>>> seemed to be taking the piss. if they could redo the 1970s episodes
>>>> with all the modern SX and CGI, they would be fantastic. I thought
>>>> Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines wernt.
>>>
>>> "I thought Capaldi was also very good, but the storylines weren't." ....
>>> Ditto for Jodie, I think!!
>>
>> The whole chibnall/Whittaker Era deserve a retcon!
>
>.... but we all know that ain't gunna happen!!

So you think!

>--
>Daniel

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>,
anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
>
>JINX you owe me ice cream
>

3 years missing!

>
>>
>> --
>> Let's go Brandon!
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me>,
Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4/11/2024 12:29 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>>
>>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>>
>>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>>
>>> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
>>
>> JINX you owe me ice cream
>
>The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
>you first encounter the show.
>
>pt
>

The votes should now open!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

In article <xn0okgdw0153aw7002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>Cryptoengineer wrote:
>>
>> The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
>> you first encounter the show.
>
>I feel sorry for those that first encountered the show between
>1987 & 1989 so...
>
>Talk about arriving late to a party and finding it all over! ;-)
>

Boo on you!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; unsubscribe from Google Groups to be seen
What worth the power of law that won't stop lawlessness? -unknown

anim8rfsk@cox.net wrote:
> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>> john_nospam@jhall.co.uk wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:

>>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>>
>>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>>
>>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>>
>> Late 1970's to the early 1980's.
>
>JINX you owe me ice cream

I had it delivered via TARDIS.

--
Let's go Brandon!

On 4/10/2024 12:19 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> John Hall <john_nospam@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>> In message <uv67tu$10nsn$1@dont-email.me>, Ubiquitous
>> <weberm@polaris.net> writes
>>> In article <uuvpup$lgg$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> 1970s?
>>>>>> 1980s?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure which one, but leaning towards the 1980's.
>>>>
>>>> The JN-T years.
>>>
>>> I had Tom Baker and Peter Davidson in mind when I chose.
>>>
>>
>> Wasn't Tom Baker the 1970s?
>
> 1974-1981
>

I watched him in the 80s so I always thought of him as an 80s Doctor.
It's so weird looking back on it now and realizing he was long gone by
the time I started to watch. Even in the early 90s his episodes were
still being rerun, probably more than the later Doctors. I think by the
McCoy took over my local PBS station was getting them pretty close to
the U.K. airings and that just reinforced the idea that I had always
been watching them close to real time.

In message <uv93fl$1pbbb$2@dont-email.me>, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> writes
>The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which
>you first encounter the show.

For me that was the 1960s, but I don't consider that the best decade.
For me that would have to be the 1970s. And though William Hartnell was
my first Doctor, I consider Tom Baker's Doctor the best. Colin Baker's
was the worst - through no fault of his own, it was just that the way
the series chose to develop his character was misguided IMO.
--
John Hall
"Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people
from coughing."
Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)