Herman wrote:
>
> FakeBlue:

You may call me purple if you prefer.
>
>> "The IDF fired at the cars, not at their
>> passengers. Do you believe any soldier
>> can tell from afar if the vehicle carries
>> nothing but food or water, without any
>> weapons hidden inside?"
>
> You're literally willing to say anything,
> and lie more circles around anything, to
> justify more killing in Gaza.
I did not lie, since I did not claim I knew
the facts on the ground. I asked a question
to find out if you knew the facts, rather
simply regurgitate the lies Hamas tells
you and the rest of the world.

Here is the question again: do you believe
a bunch of soldiers watching a column of
vehicles from 1+ km can tell if food is
all they carry? Or if there are no Hamas
fighters hiding inside the vechicles?
Yes/no?

> Blowing apart three DRIVING cars means
> killing the occupants of said cars.

Yes indeed. The part you appear to ignore
deliberately is that as long as there is
room for doubt about what the vehicles
carried firing at them was legitimate
under the laws of war.

> Perhaps you think this is a video game.

It isn't. This is precisely my point.

> The cars were marked as a humanitarian
> aid convoy.

"Marked" does not prove anything.

There have been countless situations
when "humanitarian aid" was used as
cover for military supplies. This is
common enough practice in Gaza. Just
think for a moment about the hospitals
and the schools that have 3, 4 or 5
levels of underground tunnels for
Hamas to use in running operations.
This hospitals are "humanitarian"
too -- right?

> The IDF were told about this convoy.

"Were told"? WTF does this mean? Do
you think any army is required to
operate by following instructions
from anonymous callers?

> That's why they were attacked.

No, they were most likely attacked
because there was some suspicion
(justified or not) the vehicles
may have carried weapons and/or
Hamas fighters in addition to
the "humanitarian aid".

> The IDF / Israel doesn't want any
> humanitarian aid going into Gaza.

How do you know? Do you read the
minds of the IDF planners? You are
obviously looking for "intent" when
the entire episode was most likely
the result of human error.

> That's why Gaza is facing famine.

Gaza is facing famine because it
started a war it cannot win. No
more, no less, and nothing else.

> Israel is using famine as a war
> tool.

While food and other shortages are
often side effects of war, it makes
no sense to claim it is weaponized.
As you probably noticed, famine is
far more likely to kill the weak,
the old and the very young rather
than Hamas fighters. No army is as
stupid as to act the way you claim.

> Palestinians need to get out (which
> they can't) or die.

Not so fast. Egypt can definitely
open its borders for Gaza refugees.
The arab states who back Hamas can
definitely send ships to evacuate
civilians through the Mediterranean.

Come to think about it, why doesn't
the Netherlands, or some coalition
of EU countries do just this? Send
a bunch of ships to evacuate Gaza
civilians?

> Reminds you of anything?

Yes, it does. It reminds me how
stupid and pluted you are.

> Nobody has any illusions about
> this any longer.

Indeed.

> Your little butt boy friend said it
> most clearly. He wants to party in
> Gaza in 2025,

Nothing wonrg with that, People should
be able to party wherever they like,
no matter how inhospitable the place.

> when it's ethnically cleansed of any
> Palestinian presence.

He didn't say that. You made it up.
It is your standard MO to impute
hidden motives to everyone and
everything they say.

Idiot!

Gerard wrote:
>
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/21/we-are-about-to-witness-the-most-intense-famine-since-world-war-ii-in-gaza

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyfDp8BE9Yg

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/how-gaza-health-ministry-fakes-casualty-numbers