Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

It was a brave man that ate the first oyster.


aus+uk / uk.telecom / Re: Local numbers on VOIP

SubjectAuthor
* Local numbers on VOIPScott
+* Re: Local numbers on VOIPWoody
|`* Re: Local numbers on VOIPBob Eager
| `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPWoody
|  +* Re: Local numbers on VOIPScott
|  |`* Re: Local numbers on VOIPMark Carver
|  | +* Re: Local numbers on VOIPAndy Burns
|  | |`- Re: Local numbers on VOIPMark Carver
|  | +- Re: Local numbers on VOIPBrightsideS9
|  | `- Re: Local numbers on VOIPWoody
|  +* Re: Local numbers on VOIPBob Eager
|  |`* Re: Local numbers on VOIPWoody
|  | +- Re: Local numbers on VOIPDavey
|  | `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPBob Eager
|  |  `- Re: Local numbers on VOIPDavid Wade
|  `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPMark Carver
|   `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPThe Natural Philosopher
|    `- Re: Local numbers on VOIPTweed
+* Re: Local numbers on VOIPTheo
|`* Re: Local numbers on VOIPAndy Burns
| `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPScott
|  `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPAndy Burns
|   `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPTweed
|    `* Re: Local numbers on VOIPWoody
|     `- Re: Local numbers on VOIPTweed
`* Re: Local numbers on VOIPJon Schneider
 `- Re: Local numbers on VOIPScott

Pages:12
Re: Local numbers on VOIP

<uigj4u$1ng2f$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=1518&group=uk.telecom#1518

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: usenet.tweed@gmail.com (Tweed)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Subject: Re: Local numbers on VOIP
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:13:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <uigj4u$1ng2f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jmdhki1ig7m6e04de2mhm7i0j0rbqe66uj@4ax.com>
<uiagbg$ei94$1@dont-email.me>
<kqs2dsFpj8tU5@mid.individual.net>
<uiakv8$f7gk$1@dont-email.me>
<kr0vjoFdehpU2@mid.individual.net>
<uifhqo$1h2gh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:13:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="129d562b3f7d956f270147d8e9e4228b";
logging-data="1818703"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189X9UYLeAEiH1Js7sWEC6y"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qlxXxU+uvJasm7oTNXE0pip8mC4=
sha1:0tBO2f3p8ZTE6R2l7vO7J5mbKek=
 by: Tweed - Wed, 8 Nov 2023 18:13 UTC

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 08/11/2023 08:36, Mark Carver wrote:
>> On 06/11/2023 12:08, Woody wrote:
>>
>>> But as I said come 2025/26 when we are all on fibre
>>
>> That has _never_ been the plan. We will all have VoIP based landline
>> services (if we want them) from 2025/6 (although I do wonder), but
>> millions will still be on copper xDSL for a few more years beyond that,
>> probably some into the 2030s
>>
> Yes.
>
> The essence of the plan is to get rid of exchanges first, and powered
> green boxes later on.
>
> Getting rid of exchanges means VOIP and getting rid of landline
> baseband telephony.
>
> Getting rid of green boxes means FTTP.
>
> I completely agree there will be powered green boxes into the 2030s
> *unless* the government mandates a minimum of - say - 50Mbps ...
>
>

It seems getting rid of exchanges is going to be a slow process. See

https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2023/11/openreach-reduces-pilot-for-national-uk-exchange-closures.html

Re: Local numbers on VOIP

<bslski9ivorilaig2mphpqe6rqc439chuq@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=1527&group=uk.telecom#1527

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk (Scott)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom
Subject: Re: Local numbers on VOIP
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:18:28 +0000
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <bslski9ivorilaig2mphpqe6rqc439chuq@4ax.com>
References: <jmdhki1ig7m6e04de2mhm7i0j0rbqe66uj@4ax.com> <kqv46nF3utlU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ZakzIAuRF57pAmAdZLFkqQkREksQIq0xkBK2jHKbHhmkSHAVEk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1FUTQDq5zKerfkBtNByBOahatys= sha256:gH9GmGiie/Au0MvlZKIWst3D45Rf3M/AwFARDqYNVvU=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 by: Scott - Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:18 UTC

On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 15:42:13 +0000, Jon Schneider
<jon@jschneider.tenreversed> wrote:

>More importantly this is about a very particular piece of SIP software
>and not VOIP in general.
>
>Jon
>
>On 06/11/2023 09:53, Scott wrote:
>> I saw this interesting piece of information recently:

Yes it is, as I acknowledged. My reason for posting was to show what
can be done. I assume the idea is not unique to one router box.

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor