Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You will visit the Dung Pits of Glive soon.


aus+uk / uk.telecom.broadband / Duct size for fibre

SubjectAuthor
* Duct size for fibreTim+
+- Re: Duct size for fibreAbandoned_Trolley
+* Re: Duct size for fibreMark Carver
|+- Re: Duct size for fibreTweed
|`* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| +* Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
| |`* Re: Duct size for fibreTheo
| | +- Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
| | +* Re: Duct size for fibreTheo
| | |`- Re: Duct size for fibrePeter Johnson
| | `* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  +* Re: Duct size for fibreJeff Layman
| |  |+* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  ||+* Re: Duct size for fibreJeff Layman
| |  |||`- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  ||`* Re: Duct size for fibreBrightsideS9
| |  || `* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  ||  `* Re: Duct size for fibreRupert Moss-Eccardt
| |  ||   `- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  |`- Re: Duct size for fibreJava Jive
| |  +* Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
| |  |`* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  | `* Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
| |  |  `- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |  `* Re: Duct size for fibreTheo
| |   +- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |   `* Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |    `* Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
| |     +- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| |     `- Re: Duct size for fibreTim+
| `- Re: Duct size for fibreNick Finnigan
+- Re: Duct size for fibreAndy Burns
+- Re: Duct size for fibrenotya...@gmail.com
`- Re: Duct size for fibre (Update)Tim+

Pages:12
Duct size for fibre

<548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5550&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5550

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Duct size for fibre
Date: 10 Aug 2023 16:18:32 GMT
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net LbQlopnFQTUREhJZaoyRygOKpsP7Njg87M6oNzIOm3TpbzqBc=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MThHz6kDt9HwI6CI3XMqL+7Xhyo= sha1:pM6uSXYwG+c+Ftps+p4Gr4Oq/Ko= sha256:corgY17fOL+4ZnIRQzlabs7RskE4/QnywnINUHW8B8w=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:18 UTC

I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.

I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
“non-standard” bit of ducting?

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub360g$eivr$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5551&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5551

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fred@fred-smith.co.uk (Abandoned_Trolley)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:15:59 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <ub360g$eivr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:16:00 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e5741963e461656b2ce297ae3606d799";
logging-data="478203"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18JLB3H8H8f9/4XkJUbPzMykWSExPpY3OPq7cL4URRqLQ=="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.14.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zG2oTALHJRABZCgmxSjNMXOlP6E=
In-Reply-To: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Abandoned_Trolley - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:15 UTC

On 10/08/2023 17:18, Tim+ wrote:
>
> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
> outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
> that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.
>
>
> I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
> toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
> would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
> through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
> suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
> “non-standard” bit of ducting?
>
> Tim
>

I think you can still get hold of some flexible ribbed hose / duct stuff
which used to be called "Kopex" ?

Or have a look at
https://www.screwfix.com/p/adaptaflex-flexible-conduit-25mm-x-10m-grey/95125

--
random signature text inserted here

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5552&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5552

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: mark.carver@invalid.invalid (Mark Carver)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 19:51:44 +0100
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net FLOxvOSyObTnATJf4IC+SARdQnO74KA9FNHySg43H+rUrYiow=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cFAf5Cvav5gXH211l+4EzpRZ/oQ= sha256:RnkPpviW0C0FU0OkjWq9J+m5Q3tFe1umqAPm3CISp4Q=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.14.0
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Mark Carver - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 18:51 UTC

On 10/08/2023 17:18, Tim+ wrote:
> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
> outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
> that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.
>
>
> I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
> toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
> would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
> through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
> suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
> “non-standard” bit of ducting?
>
> Tim
>
Get the real stuff, grey 54mm 'Telecom' ducting. (Or green (I think)
54mm if it's an 'Alt Net')

Available from multiple sources (legitimately)

Here's an example
https://store.jdpipes.co.uk/telecoms-bt-ducting/

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub3g4q$g6fu$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5553&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5553

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: usenet.tweed@gmail.com (Tweed)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:08:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <ub3g4q$g6fu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:08:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6beb692be52044ce87130463467e94ab";
logging-data="530942"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lm+Wxthles1nHJs9VjTGz"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ePKnTQqy1DdT2qL8IE+QHkIFsh8=
sha1:fQaxd1gCcrDdJ0rz7ta0AOdWPnU=
 by: Tweed - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:08 UTC

Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 10/08/2023 17:18, Tim+ wrote:
>> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
>> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
>> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
>> outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
>> that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.
>>
>>
>> I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
>> toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
>> would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
>> through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
>> suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
>> “non-standard” bit of ducting?
>>
>> Tim
>>
> Get the real stuff, grey 54mm 'Telecom' ducting. (Or green (I think)
> 54mm if it's an 'Alt Net')
>
> Available from multiple sources (legitimately)
>
> Here's an example
> https://store.jdpipes.co.uk/telecoms-bt-ducting/
>

Cityfibre use purple ducting, despite it allegedly being used for motorway
use.

Re: Duct size for fibre

<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5554&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5554

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 10 Aug 2023 21:26:23 GMT
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net SlEZfkragY3aEHpJUWmhlgN8clMH8V9pzsVm1u0ckJbba/eQU=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aaudqH9yl4MbuQwJk6zKioYzVpw= sha1:FuWAyp19X9Uc+3IQu6FsAugwkls= sha256:GKF9pGwz8KYHerYQczIca5U01PxOP/vamf78KPt4mgY=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 21:26 UTC

Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 10/08/2023 17:18, Tim+ wrote:
>> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
>> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
>> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
>> outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
>> that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.
>>
>>
>> I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
>> toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
>> would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
>> through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
>> suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
>> “non-standard” bit of ducting?
>>
>> Tim
>>
> Get the real stuff, grey 54mm 'Telecom' ducting. (Or green (I think)
> 54mm if it's an 'Alt Net')
>
> Available from multiple sources (legitimately)
>
> Here's an example
> https://store.jdpipes.co.uk/telecoms-bt-ducting/
>

That would require serious drilling or trenching, neither of which I want
to do underneath a resin bonded driveway. A 4ft long drill might be hard
to find and and even assuming I could get a suitable size drill, if then
have the problem of pulling it through. Hence why I’m asking if some thing
smaller and smooth sided like hosepipe would work.

I’m hopeful that perhaps a length of rebar could be hammered through and
then pulled back with a hose attached.

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5555&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5555

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 23:10:37 +0100
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net rTWrQYEzRhbAcfw/eciJ7giI0Y+9H2VwvZVVoz287omOoJLZF1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:C2fRnHRzBDpAP5Rae1vMkaVmgIc= sha256:dU2uG3cl9jO/ti3mhKVYHFQql+HVSXo9C8aVqUxpA2U=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Andy Burns - Thu, 10 Aug 2023 22:10 UTC

On 10/08/2023 22:26, Tim+ wrote:

> Mark Carver wrote:
>
>> https://store.jdpipes.co.uk/telecoms-bt-ducting/
>
> That would require serious drilling or trenchin

Well BT do use pretty wide ducts, 34mm or so?

> neither of which I want
> to do underneath a resin bonded driveway.

Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre?
have a peek in their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub4qp5$pcq2$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5556&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5556

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nix@genie.co.uk (Nick Finnigan)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:16:36 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <ub4qp5$pcq2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:16:37 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e663cef6b6128814dbe52c8475ae64ad";
logging-data="832322"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zdWKk+zmUX9Oaka504/dI"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.5.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/drg7JYZPCUhNwGqzct4gpI2/dE=
In-Reply-To: <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Nick Finnigan - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:16 UTC

On 10/08/2023 22:26, Tim+ wrote:
>
> That would require serious drilling or trenching, neither of which I want
> to do underneath a resin bonded driveway. A 4ft long drill might be hard
> to find and and even assuming I could get a suitable size drill, if then
> have the problem of pulling it through. Hence why I’m asking if some thing
> smaller and smooth sided like hosepipe would work.

I suspect they don't have a suitable way to join hose to duct, and won't
use hose all the way.

> I’m hopeful that perhaps a length of rebar could be hammered through and
> then pulled back with a hose attached.

If it is nearly all soil, you might be able to enlarge the rebar size
tunnel. Properly compacted subgrade would be tricky anyway.

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjm9jpFnmpqU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5557&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5557

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:25:32 +0100
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <kjm9jpFnmpqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net UEPb973lrWRsS30yUp6/CwSRE4uwi0Io9n89bArzjykDDqrIef
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fcF1FiUKVecgWuckCEdFzch22Bw= sha256:S9p+ZtohrlZC3yLsrvCoORgUTYqn86bLm3a21pVtb8Y=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Andy Burns - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 08:25 UTC

Tim+ wrote:

> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement

What types/depths of foundation is under the driveway?

Re: Duct size for fibre

<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5558&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5558

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!i2pn.org!news.nntp4.net!nntp.terraraq.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!.POSTED.chiark.greenend.org.uk!not-for-mail
From: theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Theo)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 11 Aug 2023 10:39:03 +0100 (BST)
Organization: University of Cambridge, England
Message-ID: <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net> <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: chiark.greenend.org.uk; posting-host="chiark.greenend.org.uk:212.13.197.229";
logging-data="27246"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@chiark.greenend.org.uk"
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (Linux/5.10.0-22-amd64 (x86_64))
Originator: theom@chiark.greenend.org.uk ([212.13.197.229])
 by: Theo - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:39 UTC

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D

If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.

The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
Presumably they can tell you, though.

Theo

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjmebpFofb3U1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5559&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5559

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:46:36 +0100
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <kjmebpFofb3U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net iiaPrSrbq/LBY9Ajn5A0xg/qDErXPG57/DEociQssIfWAwmm1c
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bASZGOTya30d7AEqfObUcm+AtZE= sha256:W2b0hFOroF9nLo7eVXnh6/JxputmzspHXUHFTl2Ju4E=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 by: Andy Burns - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 09:46 UTC

Theo wrote:

> ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I know Openreach and
> Virgin have documents describing how to make new build sites fibre-ready

BT did (do?) allow you collect ducting from them

Re: Duct size for fibre

<138882de-4496-4ebf-befa-98043677b27fn@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5560&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5560

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1a0b:b0:404:c707:88e8 with SMTP id f11-20020a05622a1a0b00b00404c70788e8mr16326qtb.8.1691748090196;
Fri, 11 Aug 2023 03:01:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:151:b0:1bc:9724:41f5 with SMTP id
r17-20020a170903015100b001bc972441f5mr817493plc.4.1691748089868; Fri, 11 Aug
2023 03:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 03:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:14a8:29d9:39cf:9a7b;
posting-account=4hkfSwkAAADcv-_hpUK54e62WKY0FdSL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:14a8:29d9:39cf:9a7b
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <138882de-4496-4ebf-befa-98043677b27fn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
From: notyalckram@gmail.com (notya...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:01:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2550
 by: notya...@gmail.com - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 10:01 UTC

On Thursday, 10 August 2023 at 17:18:37 UTC+1, Tim+ wrote:
> I mentioned before that my daughter is having trouble getting fibre to
> their house because they had a resin bonded driveway done shortly after
> Cityfibre had been along and put their access “toby” in the pavement
> outside their house. It seems that this is a barrier to putting a duct in
> that ISPs and City fibre don’t feel motivated to do anything about.
>
>
> I’m tempted to attempt a bit of oblique drilling beneath the drive from the
> toby to reach a nearby flower bed where I can dig down to where the drill
> would emerge. Obviously I’d need to put in something to feed the fibre
> through so I’m wondering about suitable ducting. Would garden hosepipe
> suffice or would I need something bigger? Would fibre installers balk at a
> “non-standard” bit of ducting?
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Please don't feed the trolls

The new ducts being install inside BT's ducts look like 19mm in pink. Plenty for a single fibre or two / three at a pinch.

You can get metre long masonry drills widely.

Beware drilling under your driveway there may be other utilities there.

Re: Duct size for fibre

<7vf*Yuynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5561&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5561

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!news.nntp4.net!nntp.terraraq.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!.POSTED.chiark.greenend.org.uk!not-for-mail
From: theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk (Theo)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 11 Aug 2023 12:00:27 +0100 (BST)
Organization: University of Cambridge, England
Message-ID: <7vf*Yuynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net> <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Injection-Info: chiark.greenend.org.uk; posting-host="chiark.greenend.org.uk:212.13.197.229";
logging-data="9373"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@chiark.greenend.org.uk"
User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (Linux/5.10.0-22-amd64 (x86_64))
Originator: theom@chiark.greenend.org.uk ([212.13.197.229])
 by: Theo - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:00 UTC

Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> > Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
> > their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>
> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>
> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
> Presumably they can tell you, though.

CF have some training videos for installers. This is the fibre blow on the
'legacy build' (whatever that means):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm7KGp4fWSM

It seems like they direct-bury BFT (blown fibre tubing) and then blow fibre
through the middle of it. It's a bit hard to see from the images so it's
possible the BFT is only a sub duct and goes inside a stronger duct.

In the OP's case you would need some of that BFT. If you bury a
hosepipe, they now have to get the BFT down the hosepipe before they can
blown fibre into the BFT. That may just make two problems instead of one.

So the moral of the story is to ask them what is best for their workflow.
Without that we're just guessing, and wrong guesses may make things harder
not easier.

Theo

Re: Duct size for fibre

<5oscdi1o1dp2cr9iiuep9j8oce048do0iu@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5563&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5563

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: peter@parksidewood.nospam (Peter Johnson)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:55:09 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <5oscdi1o1dp2cr9iiuep9j8oce048do0iu@4ax.com>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net> <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <7vf*Yuynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2823dab6ed8af242cd70d5ceefba2dc1";
logging-data="994788"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MxF081C1j2foBePM8I7u56zXCx1NJzv4="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:75c0TOX04TsHPX3ylVmTJb+e+nQ=
 by: Peter Johnson - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 17:55 UTC

On 11 Aug 2023 12:00:27 +0100 (BST), Theo
<theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

>CF have some training videos for installers. This is the fibre blow on the
>'legacy build' (whatever that means):
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm7KGp4fWSM
>
>It seems like they direct-bury BFT (blown fibre tubing) and then blow fibre
>through the middle of it. It's a bit hard to see from the images so it's
>possible the BFT is only a sub duct and goes inside a stronger duct.
>

Here's the scene when my CF fibre was about to be blown in:
https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=F54F0FD7FB806F48&id=F54F0FD7FB806F48%21570535&parId=F54F0FD7FB806F48%21568439&o=OneUp

The brown tubing was connected to the purple which was pushed through
the BT duct to the pit and then to the adjacent CF cabinet. A
compressor was connected to the 'gun' to blow the fibre through.

Re: Duct size for fibre

<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5564&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5564

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 11 Aug 2023 20:22:52 GMT
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net QNdJxLKV6/MRZQoBQMxZ5AA7J4QsHMw5R167gDrd0WSRhwnsI=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Baqdw8OE7nLUQyPNkPPHHvEv4XU= sha1:A7nBa3QtN4zbm7sIuxnAUR6irtU= sha256:9aRn3mulPIk72yR/i14LfASvJIDMZ5sWEgr0hDtZr8c=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Fri, 11 Aug 2023 20:22 UTC

Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>
> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>
> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>
> Theo
>

Here’s the problem.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7

Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5565&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5565

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeff@invalid.invalid (Jeff Layman)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:06:43 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:06:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="462eb82465f3db8181853550a3f37479";
logging-data="1317857"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jmCL+5ob2RjKkq1FMbnAx8zYKGZ1PALc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qHRw+I1k/nF9gSXn1gVWA7nkRzc=
In-Reply-To: <1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Jeff Layman - Sat, 12 Aug 2023 07:06 UTC

On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>
>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>
>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>
>> Theo
>>
>
> Here’s the problem.
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>
> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.

Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish. How
do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?

As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.

--

Jeff

Re: Duct size for fibre

<234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5566&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5566

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 12 Aug 2023 08:31:58 GMT
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net BB28Zj7ldFLTFmPVkAWeZwpsyrZ6gZzQGQULIGfxnpFJpagYQ=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RJr+3NRUw0WLscKhPPX5IDhugTc= sha1:ROYxP+fYn/qJeNHU58uHTUeKyLc= sha256:iZa6TNUuLUrYWJmXQ4yDFfOuX8VO3zD8ZZSc+UF3ZoI=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Sat, 12 Aug 2023 08:31 UTC

Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>>
>>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>>
>>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>>
>>> Theo
>>>
>>
>> Here’s the problem.
>>
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>>
>> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
>> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
>> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
>> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.
>
> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
> property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
> brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish.

I’ll use that argument if any busybody argues. ;-)

> How
> do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
> people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
> and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
> chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?

Not sure yet. Depends on how stony it is. May just try a vibrating
multi-tool and a lot of sacrificial blades. Maybe just chisel it.

>
> As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
> border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
> Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.

I was going to rake out the existing tarmac, pop it in an oven dish, warm
it up and see if I can re-use it.

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub7ldi$19dt7$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5567&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5567

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeff@invalid.invalid (Jeff Layman)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 11:03:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <ub7ldi$19dt7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
<234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:03:30 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="462eb82465f3db8181853550a3f37479";
logging-data="1357735"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX194lKmlczrmOv/K/ge91oISfpz0EOIFD3s="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Yfjmj7lMqqQITDSZusqnUwAiTlg=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Jeff Layman - Sat, 12 Aug 2023 10:03 UTC

On 12/08/2023 09:31, Tim+ wrote:
> Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
>>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>>>
>>>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>>>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>>>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>>>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>>>
>>>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>>>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>>>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>>>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>>>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>>>
>>>> Theo
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here’s the problem.
>>>
>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>>>
>>> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
>>> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
>>> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
>>> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.
>>
>> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
>> property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
>> brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish.
>
> I’ll use that argument if any busybody argues. ;-)

You might find this of interest (although it does involve matters north
of the border):
<https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6343302/can-we-cut-tarmac-along-boundary-with-pavement-to-install-edging>

Apart from boundary matters, it also mentions how the pros cut into tarmac.

>> How
>> do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
>> people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
>> and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
>> chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?
>
> Not sure yet. Depends on how stony it is. May just try a vibrating
> multi-tool and a lot of sacrificial blades. Maybe just chisel it.
>
>>
>> As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
>> border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
>> Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.
>
> I was going to rake out the existing tarmac, pop it in an oven dish, warm
> it up and see if I can re-use it.

You better not let "The Management" see you using her nice clean oven
for that purpose!

--

Jeff

Re: Duct size for fibre

<611976872.713539212.470695.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5568&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5568

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 12 Aug 2023 13:22:44 GMT
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <611976872.713539212.470695.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
<234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7ldi$19dt7$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net E40F9ZdZhkOhYM6LFVFVVA9M8y5Bane6g5rtttvnwfgUYKSlE=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f6wBM0QGVTy0zTiZaWqcmyMEZvE= sha1:v85gnMX/39TKMVd6QmnZ1xC9WbQ= sha256:LcNOYoCy/wB4m9jhlcmy436+UJx0pyQHTC/i1jSSNzw=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Sat, 12 Aug 2023 13:22 UTC

Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 12/08/2023 09:31, Tim+ wrote:
>> Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
>>>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>>>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>>>>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>>>>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>>>>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>>>>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>>>>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>>>>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>>>>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Theo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here’s the problem.
>>>>
>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>>>>
>>>> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
>>>> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
>>>> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
>>>> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.
>>>
>>> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
>>> property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
>>> brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish.
>>
>> I’ll use that argument if any busybody argues. ;-)
>
> You might find this of interest (although it does involve matters north
> of the border):
> <https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6343302/can-we-cut-tarmac-along-boundary-with-pavement-to-install-edging>
>
> Apart from boundary matters, it also mentions how the pros cut into tarmac.
>
>>> How
>>> do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
>>> people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
>>> and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
>>> chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?
>>
>> Not sure yet. Depends on how stony it is. May just try a vibrating
>> multi-tool and a lot of sacrificial blades. Maybe just chisel it.
>>
>>>
>>> As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
>>> border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
>>> Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.
>>
>> I was going to rake out the existing tarmac, pop it in an oven dish, warm
>> it up and see if I can re-use it.
>
> You better not let "The Management" see you using her nice clean oven
> for that purpose!
>

I’ll wrap it in foil. She’ll never know. ;-)

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<ub82dn$1bd24$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5569&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5569

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: java@evij.com.invalid (Java Jive)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 14:45:25 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <ub82dn$1bd24$1@dont-email.me>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2023 13:45:28 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="95296b458903734a291c6b46c9b95566";
logging-data="1422404"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18FqWULPziYNFdlObQQ8hopsxHzpjzVNOQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.4.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gxj4PnE4AOPXykmO4Gil2pZ6DzI=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
 by: Java Jive - Sat, 12 Aug 2023 13:45 UTC

On 12/08/2023 08:06, Jeff Layman wrote:
>
> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
> property?
Not necessarily at all. AIUI, the border of a property is defined by a
map which should be part of the deeds. Here in Scotland, there are
various abuses which are quite common ...

A) 'Stealing' of adjoining land by erecting a fence outside the actual
borders of a property. One house I looked at in Kyle Of Lochalsh had
done this.

On the A838 not far from here, there is a barely discernible ruined
croft, all that remains being an overgrown corner of the footings.
Surrounding the site are some very tall beech trees in the shape of two
sides of a rectangle, which, allowing for gaps created by wind felling,
clearly have grown up from what was previously a beech hedge around the
property. The newly erected fence of a neighbouring field crosses
inside this line of the old boundary hedge, apparently 'stealing' some
of the property's land!

B) Theft of public roads ...

There are many sites in Scotland where roads have been rerouted and
their original paths have been 'stolen' by local residents gating them
off. Here are some examples:

1) Kylesku

1950s map showing the old Kylesku ferry and associated roads
superimposed over modern satellite imagery showing the current road and
its bridge, you can use the slider in the left-hand dialog to fade
between the two:

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=12&lat=58.26476&lon=-5.06364&layers=10road56&b=1

Google Maps Street View showing the old north approach road gated off
with security cameras:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@58.2635638,-5.0397771,3a,15y,116.4h,77.61t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0Saup5Y131HaSJa5zYHT9g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

I visited this site recently and I'm glad to say that the security gate
is open, but the forbidding aspect remains.

2) Shiel Bridge

As above, the same 1950s map over satellite imagery showing how the road
from Shiel Bridge to Glenelg used to go:

https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=12&lat=57.22407&lon=-5.44521&layers=10road56&b=1

A section of it, too, is now gated off at each end:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@57.2121526,-5.4162683,3a,37.5y,272.41h,87.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s2Aq0opGLb1cbU9DQzMDtWA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@57.2127651,-5.4204412,3a,37.5y,102.49h,94.08t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1srKSK9kdzXNunp2r_Ek3G7w!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DrKSK9kdzXNunp2r_Ek3G7w%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D153.75359%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192

I happened to visit this site when I first moved to Scotland, and the
gates were still there, and I have every reason to suppose that they
still are.

3) Ballachulish

The old road along the shoreline under the bridge is gated off by a
private property at the eastern end, but this is not shown in Google Maps.

I've emailed Highland Council twice protesting this behaviour, and never
received an acknowledgement, let alone a human reply.

--

Fake news kills!

I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
www.macfh.co.uk

Re: Duct size for fibre

<gg4hdih4hisrti25mds5vp8949mmstofm3@4ax.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5570&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5570

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.invalid (BrightsideS9)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:27:44 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <gg4hdih4hisrti25mds5vp8949mmstofm3@4ax.com>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net> <608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net> <ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me> <234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Reply-To: brightside@sonnenkinder.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f13c23fa6ae8fcecc275a653a129d9da";
logging-data="1858591"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19S+pqBKshyhpFffGqtEd8v"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zTJ/MpOYqmkvZs7+03C/ITjrcZA=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
 by: BrightsideS9 - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 08:27 UTC

On 12 Aug 2023 08:31:58 GMT, Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> wrote:

>Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
>>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>>>
>>>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>>>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>>>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>>>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>>>
>>>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>>>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>>>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>>>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>>>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>>>
>>>> Theo
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here’s the problem.
>>>
>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>>>
>>> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
>>> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
>>> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
>>> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.
>>
>> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
>> property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
>> brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish.
>
>I’ll use that argument if any busybody argues. ;-)
>
>> How
>> do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
>> people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
>> and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
>> chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?
>
>Not sure yet. Depends on how stony it is. May just try a vibrating
>multi-tool and a lot of sacrificial blades. Maybe just chisel it.
>
>>
>> As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
>> border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
>> Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.
>
>I was going to rake out the existing tarmac, pop it in an oven dish, warm
>it up and see if I can re-use it.
>
For £10 you can get more than enough cold lay tarmac from Wickes, B&Q
(or Amazon if you are eligible for free delivery and want to pay
double the price from Wickes and B&Q), to fix your chiselling and do a
decent job.

--
brightsde

Re: Duct size for fibre

<407190012.713608964.023648.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5571&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5571

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 13 Aug 2023 08:44:05 GMT
Lines: 69
Message-ID: <407190012.713608964.023648.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<ub7b23$186v1$1@dont-email.me>
<234169730.713521695.022721.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<gg4hdih4hisrti25mds5vp8949mmstofm3@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Gc+MgMyefkm/Izo3/vPcOg6TcUsBBqTGIS0KqRA4+0MsdZWXo=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5qn7NJHWv6v1UUoJhgdwou/saRU= sha1:0Qh/bQ5Kux9sGHnB1AJ8sdYWyvM= sha256:+c4OG02JCRhUkwF0bpHI0/2uPbMCnElf7b8sWW9E968=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 08:44 UTC

BrightsideS9 <reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 12 Aug 2023 08:31:58 GMT, Tim+ <tim.downie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jeff Layman <Jeff@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 11/08/2023 21:22, Tim+ wrote:
>>>> Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> Do you know of a neighbour who is connected to cityfibre? have a peek in
>>>>>> their toby, round here the virgin fibre duct is about 8mm O/D
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is a CF crew working nearby, you could ask if you can have an
>>>>> offcut of their duct. Then you'd have exactly the right materials. I
>>>>> expect they're set up to blow fibre through a particular diameter of duct
>>>>> and their setup won't work with a random hosepipe or whatever.
>>>>>
>>>>> The other option would be to contact CF and say you're a developer doing a
>>>>> 'redevelopment', and ask what they would recommend for new build sites. I
>>>>> know Openreach and Virgin have documents describing how to make new build
>>>>> sites fibre-ready, but I can't find any documents for that from CF.
>>>>> Presumably they can tell you, though.
>>>>>
>>>>> Theo
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here’s the problem.
>>>>
>>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>>>>
>>>> Need to get from the access hatch to the yellow screwdriver. Alas the
>>>> tarmac is all part of the public pavement but I think I’ll risk cutting out
>>>> a fillet along the front of the drive and then drilling underground near
>>>> the gatepost. I’ll put some conduit in and reinstate the tarmac somehow.
>>>
>>> Doesn't the outside of the brick pillar define the border of your
>>> property? No matter where the tarmac is, if it's inside the edge of the
>>> brick it's on your property, and you can do with it what you wish.
>>
>> I’ll use that argument if any busybody argues. ;-)
>>
>>> How
>>> do you cut into it? I've not seen what gas/electricity/water/cable
>>> people use. I would have assumed a cutting disc would melt the tarmac
>>> and the disc would end up a sticky mess. Do they use a wide
>>> chisel-shaped bit on a pneumatic drill?
>>
>> Not sure yet. Depends on how stony it is. May just try a vibrating
>> multi-tool and a lot of sacrificial blades. Maybe just chisel it.
>>
>>>
>>> As for what you reinstate it with, another piece of whatever is used to
>>> border the end of your drive would seem to be about the right width.
>>> Tarmac patches always seem rather tatty to me.
>>
>> I was going to rake out the existing tarmac, pop it in an oven dish, warm
>> it up and see if I can re-use it.
>>
> For £10 you can get more than enough cold lay tarmac from Wickes, B&Q
> (or Amazon if you are eligible for free delivery and want to pay
> double the price from Wickes and B&Q), to fix your chiselling and do a
> decent job.
>

Cold lay stuff never looks the same. I’m hoping that reusing the old stuff
will look better.

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjrsvfFkojdU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5572&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5572

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:26:39 +0100
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <kjrsvfFkojdU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 1+1L8il6WD/S+1Yzd92UrgVEWYN5XtEZi/PTDN/bHCm0/B09Dq
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3NhV5TYWCJ9l+sKfLYAalQOHGCc= sha256:c4MDtHFPIfYYLdtQ2DYiNKTzX1uVoDhRNlOjtVHj2aM=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Andy Burns - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:26 UTC

Tim+ wrote:

> Here’s the problem.
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7

<https://youtu.be/uxw_Nc1f_mM>

Re: Duct size for fibre

<454964696.713633156.670883.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5573&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5573

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 13 Aug 2023 16:23:55 GMT
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <454964696.713633156.670883.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjrsvfFkojdU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net PCyOJ58hljQFwXQotQBc9QGi3ZqRKFnTsZFzk2+bqxEXQjYN4=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p17ezf/Z2C8KJ+9wXVntslCLjxA= sha1:fpZWLerxf+bJQiD+qFEm8/67UeA= sha256:nHThuyYczHYiWwgSbRhPE5t4dTIGlY4YzThc/zFP5GI=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 16:23 UTC

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> Tim+ wrote:
>
>> Here’s the problem.
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/ehr8Lr1L7hKXg52r7
>
> <https://youtu.be/uxw_Nc1f_mM>
>
>

I’m sure it works well in sand. Not so sure about compacted hardcore
though…

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Re: Duct size for fibre

<kjsjtrFn4cjU1@mid.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5574&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5574

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: usenet@andyburns.uk (Andy Burns)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 18:58:19 +0100
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <kjsjtrFn4cjU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net> <7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjrsvfFkojdU1@mid.individual.net>
<454964696.713633156.670883.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net /3Gf+737odBj5VBJY8mL9wF2kqhIyLeAUDPOfxNhUtZh3OrFyv
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oZWL+wyjBr+muUmt24WyfYYKqT4= sha256:3lYOcl95ZP96826q3YRCC07pT5kDPI9bYjEQhHVYQsQ=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <454964696.713633156.670883.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
 by: Andy Burns - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 17:58 UTC

Tim+ wrote:

> Andy Burns wrote:
>
>> <https://youtu.be/uxw_Nc1f_mM>
>
> I’m sure it works well in sand. Not so sure about compacted hardcore
> though…

Well, you didn't answer the question earlier!

Re: Duct size for fibre

<1549862352.713651178.494583.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=5575&group=uk.telecom.broadband#5575

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: tim.downie@gmail.com (Tim+)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: Duct size for fibre
Date: 13 Aug 2023 20:30:58 GMT
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <1549862352.713651178.494583.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
References: <548977637.713376653.681964.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjkpu0Fg7miU1@mid.individual.net>
<608281173.713395337.437104.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjl5isFi2csU1@mid.individual.net>
<7vf*Tbynz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
<1524364952.713477912.362909.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjrsvfFkojdU1@mid.individual.net>
<454964696.713633156.670883.tim.downie-gmail.com@news.individual.net>
<kjsjtrFn4cjU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4W+WHcyqXqkyXck9SBLAaQM+cTL9J9Ny/HjmhfbxwDznlyBxM=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vc6/VOpYT8hFG12cMV6ZeMEnjjc= sha1:/Yhn5dktzNlyYjJPJ/SCr6USlz8= sha256:95bmz3MNQwFTRegE9Sv+vk2UGkE0FmpvnT1yb6VUdic=
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL['N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v qdYsE'yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
 by: Tim+ - Sun, 13 Aug 2023 20:30 UTC

Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
> Tim+ wrote:
>
>> Andy Burns wrote:
>>
>>> <https://youtu.be/uxw_Nc1f_mM>
>>
>> I’m sure it works well in sand. Not so sure about compacted hardcore
>> though…
>
> Well, you didn't answer the question earlier!
>
>

I’ll admit to guessing, but a quick search would suggest that it *should*
be pretty solid base.

Tim

--
Please don't feed the trolls

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor