Rocksolid Light

Welcome to Rocksolid Light

mail  files  register  newsreader  groups  login

Message-ID:  

The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. -- Wm. Shakespeare, "Henry VI", Part IV


aus+uk / uk.telecom.broadband / Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales

SubjectAuthor
* PSTN to Digital - timescalesjgwi...@gmail.com
+- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesnotya...@gmail.com
+* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesChris Green
|`* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesMark Carver
| `- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesChris Green
+* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesTheo
|+* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesAndy Burns
||+- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesMark Carver
||`* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesGraham J
|| `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesDavid Wade
||  `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesGraham J
||   +* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesDavid Wade
||   |`* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesAndy Burns
||   | `- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesDavid Wade
||   `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesMark Carver
||    `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesGraham J
||     +- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesnotya...@gmail.com
||     `- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesWoody
|`- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesRoger
`* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesNY
 `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesTweed
  `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesGraham J
   +* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesDavid Wade
   |`* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesjgwi...@gmail.com
   | `- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesDavid Wade
   `* Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesNY
    +- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesnotya...@gmail.com
    `- Re: PSTN to Digital - timescalesWoody

Pages:12
Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales

<ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6284&group=uk.telecom.broadband#6284

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nobody@nowhere.co.uk (Graham J)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:39:39 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1a4644ce-3a7f-4ac2-9734-b77ad4232d2fn@googlegroups.com>
<3ig*Wsswz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <ksjj31FuedkU2@mid.individual.net>
<uk2uqa$3tmj1$1@dont-email.me> <uk49gb$72ia$1@dont-email.me>
<uk4a8q$79oo$1@dont-email.me> <kstncbFu334U2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:39:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="74301b6c3e605ee1316b7ee3343f4652";
logging-data="1924716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/qKx2xRxU5V/ICmc+3xdlu"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.17.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WYRaU3ucKzVUc0mTEyE4vhO2Agg=
In-Reply-To: <kstncbFu334U2@mid.individual.net>
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 231201-0, 1/12/2023), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
 by: Graham J - Fri, 1 Dec 2023 09:39 UTC

Mark Carver wrote:
> On 28/11/2023 09:01, Graham J wrote:
>
>> It's not the capability of 98km which is relevant - it is the cost of
>> installing the fibre itself.  It may be about 10km from my friend's
>> property to the nearest existing optical fibre, and he has been quoted
>> £1,030,689.70 for for a fibre connection.
>>
>> He does get a weak 4G connection - but only if he hangs out of an
>> upstairs window.
>>
>
> He may have to wake up and smell the coffee very soon then.
>
> I suspect by the end of this decade he'll discover Royal Mail won't be
> delivering to his house. The idea of universal utility provision to all
> died with the 20th Century.
>
> Does he have mains water BTW ?

Yes, and mains electricity. No mains sewer, but the septic tank works OK.

This is simply a rural area in the home counties - it's about 100 miles
from London. So it's not remote in the same way as for example Shetland
(where there is evidently really good 4G coverage).

--
Graham J

Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales

<6cd3d728-745e-42c9-baab-66b324d23933n@googlegroups.com>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6287&group=uk.telecom.broadband#6287

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2a03:b0:774:22d7:768c with SMTP id o3-20020a05620a2a0300b0077422d7768cmr842483qkp.5.1701427010659;
Fri, 01 Dec 2023 02:36:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fa44:0:b0:5ac:26f:db7c with SMTP id
g4-20020a63fa44000000b005ac026fdb7cmr3681773pgk.8.1701427010292; Fri, 01 Dec
2023 02:36:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: i2pn2.org!rocksolid2!news.neodome.net!news.mixmin.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 02:36:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:e0e9:7e0c:ec0c:1392;
posting-account=4hkfSwkAAADcv-_hpUK54e62WKY0FdSL
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a00:23c7:ef16:7b01:e0e9:7e0c:ec0c:1392
References: <1a4644ce-3a7f-4ac2-9734-b77ad4232d2fn@googlegroups.com>
<3ig*Wsswz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <ksjj31FuedkU2@mid.individual.net>
<uk2uqa$3tmj1$1@dont-email.me> <uk49gb$72ia$1@dont-email.me>
<uk4a8q$79oo$1@dont-email.me> <kstncbFu334U2@mid.individual.net> <ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6cd3d728-745e-42c9-baab-66b324d23933n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales
From: notyalckram@gmail.com (notya...@gmail.com)
Injection-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:36:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Received-Bytes: 2866
 by: notya...@gmail.com - Fri, 1 Dec 2023 10:36 UTC

On Friday, 1 December 2023 at 09:40:03 UTC, Graham J wrote:
> Mark Carver wrote:
> > On 28/11/2023 09:01, Graham J wrote:
> >
> >> It's not the capability of 98km which is relevant - it is the cost of
> >> installing the fibre itself. It may be about 10km from my friend's
> >> property to the nearest existing optical fibre, and he has been quoted
> >> £1,030,689.70 for for a fibre connection.
> >>
> >> He does get a weak 4G connection - but only if he hangs out of an
> >> upstairs window.
> >>
> >
> > He may have to wake up and smell the coffee very soon then.
> >
> > I suspect by the end of this decade he'll discover Royal Mail won't be
> > delivering to his house. The idea of universal utility provision to all
> > died with the 20th Century.
> >
> > Does he have mains water BTW ?
> Yes, and mains electricity. No mains sewer, but the septic tank works OK.
>
> This is simply a rural area in the home counties - it's about 100 miles
> from London. So it's not remote in the same way as for example Shetland
> (where there is evidently really good 4G coverage).
>
>
> --
> Graham J

There is really good mobile coverage in Inverie - the most remote village in GB. Sail or hike there - no road.

Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales

<ukcjc9$1s62p$1@dont-email.me>

  copy mid

https://news.novabbs.org/aus+uk/article-flat.php?id=6288&group=uk.telecom.broadband#6288

  copy link   Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Path: i2pn2.org!i2pn.org!usenet.network!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: harrogate3@ntlworld.com (Woody)
Newsgroups: uk.telecom.broadband
Subject: Re: PSTN to Digital - timescales
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:25:43 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <ukcjc9$1s62p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1a4644ce-3a7f-4ac2-9734-b77ad4232d2fn@googlegroups.com>
<3ig*Wsswz@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <ksjj31FuedkU2@mid.individual.net>
<uk2uqa$3tmj1$1@dont-email.me> <uk49gb$72ia$1@dont-email.me>
<uk4a8q$79oo$1@dont-email.me> <kstncbFu334U2@mid.individual.net>
<ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:25:45 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="419a6c24a096df7999a342dce6ff9758";
logging-data="1972313"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184ONWZ68+UR5pr9R+/0Ss/fTHRkNPafWg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IpbgXEeS1t/lbyoiIw93XzBxR2s=
In-Reply-To: <ukc9lf$1qnjc$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-GB
 by: Woody - Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:25 UTC

On Fri 01/12/2023 09:39, Graham J wrote:
> Mark Carver wrote:
>> On 28/11/2023 09:01, Graham J wrote:
>>
>>> It's not the capability of 98km which is relevant - it is the cost of
>>> installing the fibre itself.  It may be about 10km from my friend's
>>> property to the nearest existing optical fibre, and he has been
>>> quoted £1,030,689.70 for for a fibre connection.
>>>
>>> He does get a weak 4G connection - but only if he hangs out of an
>>> upstairs window.
>>>
>>
>> He may have to wake up and smell the coffee very soon then.
>>
>> I suspect by the end of this decade he'll discover Royal Mail won't be
>> delivering to his house. The idea of universal utility provision to
>> all died with the 20th Century.
>>
>> Does he have mains water BTW ?
>
> Yes, and mains electricity.  No mains sewer, but the septic tank works OK.
>
> This is simply a rural area in the home counties - it's about 100 miles
> from London.  So it's not remote in the same way as for example Shetland
> (where there is evidently really good 4G coverage).
>
>

Home Counties 100 miles from London???
Eh?
Birmingham is 100 miles from London and sure ain't in the Home Counties!

Pages:12
server_pubkey.txt

rocksolid light 0.9.81
clearnet tor