Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?

*What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*

Is it what religious fanatics do?

Why?
--
REFERENCE:
Subject: Re: Beeper Mini: Latest Android app to emulate iMessage protocol
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
From: Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com>
Message-ID: <fD6fN.21859$vFZa.20582@fx13.iad>
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/MLrZ4boDMW8/m/P1WLtv2dAAAJ>

On 2023-12-16, Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
>
> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?

Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
triggered you are. Precious! 🤣

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote

>> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
>
> Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
> triggered you are. Precious!

Hi Jolly Roger,
I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
lemon-juice covered bank robber.

You interest me.
Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.

Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.

These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the
most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would
send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.

There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
*Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>

What normal person does that?
None, right?

So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
{JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}

They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
*Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have been IGNORANT for years*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>

They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
*Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
<https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>

What normal person does that?
None, right?

Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
Why?

On 2023-12-17 16:13, Wally J wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
>>
>> Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
>> triggered you are. Precious!
>
> Hi Jolly Roger,
> I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
> lemon-juice covered bank robber.
>
> You interest me.
> Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
>
> Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
> worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
> flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
>
> These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the
> most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would
> send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
> of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
>
> There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
> *Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
>
> What normal person does that?
> None, right?
>
> So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
> {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
>
> They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
> everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
> *Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have been IGNORANT for years*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
>
> They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
> *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
>
> What normal person does that?
> None, right?
>
> Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
> Why?

You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.

Seriously... ...get out of your basement and meet a girl...

....or a guy if that's your thing.

On 2023-12-17 21:44, Alan wrote:

> You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.

Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
sacrifice their dignity to it.

--
“Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
- John Maynard Keynes.

Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote

> Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
> sacrifice their dignity to it.

*To the adults on these childish Apple OS newsgroups...*

a. [JR] The first person calls people "losers" & thinks that is clever.
b. [Baker] The next calls people gay & thinks that's really clever.
b. [Browne] The third calls people an "it", thinking that's also clever.

Isn't that strange?
A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
C. Why?

Specifically:
*Why do you think these people repeatedly act & think like children do?*

NOTE: It's their _only_ response to facts about Apple that they hate.
--
What kind of rather oddly strange clearly child-like person does that?

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>
>>> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
>>
>> Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
>> triggered you are. Precious!
>
> Hi Jolly Roger,
> I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
> lemon-juice covered bank robber.
>
They didn’t study that bank robber. That incident was used as an anecdote.
From their Methods: “Participants were 65 Cornell University undergraduates
from a variety of courses in psychology who earned extra credit for their
participation” which translates to WEIRD kids.

No surprise you can’t distinguish an illustrative anecdote from actual
research, which has been challenged as being nothing more than a
statistical exercise in seeing shapes in clouds.

You’re not “studying” anything. You are again masturbating in public (as
seen below):

> You interest me.
> Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
>
> Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
> worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
> flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
>
> These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the
> most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would
> send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
> of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
>
> There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
> *Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
>
> What normal person does that?
> None, right?
>
> So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
> {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
>
> They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
> everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
> *Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have
> been IGNORANT for years*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
>
> They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
> *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
>
> What normal person does that?
> None, right?
>
> Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
> Why?
>

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
>
> *What kind of rather strange ?adult? repeatedly does such a thing?*
>
> Is it what religious fanatics do?
>
> Why?

It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again…It places the
lotion in the basket.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-17 16:13, Wally J wrote:
>> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
>>
>>>> Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
>>>
>>> Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
>>> triggered you are. Precious!
>>
>> Hi Jolly Roger,
>> I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
>> lemon-juice covered bank robber.
>>
>> You interest me.
>> Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
>>
>> Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
>> worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
>> flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
>>
>> These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the
>> most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would
>> send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
>> of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
>>
>> There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
>> *Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
>>
>> What normal person does that?
>> None, right?
>>
>> So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
>> {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
>>
>> They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
>> everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
>> *Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have
>> been IGNORANT for years*
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
>>
>> They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
>> *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's faults?*
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
>>
>> What normal person does that?
>> None, right?
>>
>> Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
>> Why?
>
> You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.
>
> Seriously... ...get out of your basement and meet a girl...
>
> ...or a guy if that's your thing.
>
He could be furry or otherkin. Or into gadgetry.

On Dec 17, 2023, Alan wrote
(in article <ulobm1$3ajcm$4@dont-email.me>):

> On 2023-12-17 16:13, Wally J wrote:
> > Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote
> >
> > > > Why do iKooks repeatedly call people an "it"?
> > >
> > > Not people - just loser trolls like you. And it works. Look how
> > > triggered you are. Precious!
> >
> > Hi Jolly Roger,
> > I study you just like Dunning & Kruger studied that rather peculiar
> > lemon-juice covered bank robber.
> >
> > You interest me.
> > Hence, I read _everything_ that you write on these newsgroups, JR.
> >
> > Having gone to the best schools in this country and subsequently having
> > worked in high-tech startups in the Silicon Valley, I've never met in the
> > flesh people like these strange iKooks are - only here - on Apple ngs.
> >
> > These strange people only exist on the child-like Apple newsgroups for the
> > most part, as almost nobody on the adult operating system newsgroups would
> > send users on a futile wild-goose chase just because they asked a question
> > of an Apple product that Apple doesn't want that product to be able to do.
> >
> > There are _many_ (many!) examples of this interaction; here's just one:
> > *Why are iKooks sadistically sending innocent users on wild-goose chases?*
> > <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ynh0PE9lK_I/>
> >
> > What normal person does that?
> > None, right?
> >
> > So there's something rather strangely different about these Apple posters.
> > {JollyRoger,YourName,Haemactylus,nospam,AlanBrowne,AlanBaker,Snit, et al.}
> >
> > They've lied for years about Apple support (or they were ignorant of
> > everything that they claimed - you can choose which one but not both).
> > *Proof the iKooks have lied for years - or - more to the point - have been
> > IGNORANT for years*
> > <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/ZE8GboBUO3c/>
> >
> > They constantly lie to cover up what Apple does, to claim it didn't happen.
> > *Why do the low IQ iKooks like nospam always lie to cover up Apple's
> > faults?*
> > <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/AiMYbSmplkw/>
> >
> > What normal person does that?
> > None, right?
> >
> > Only a small set of posters to the Apple newsgroups does that.
> > Why?
>
> You REALLY need to get laid, Arlen.
>
> Seriously... ...get out of your basement and meet a girl...
>
> ...or a guy if that's your thing.

The supply of girls (or guys) willing to put up with Arlen and others like
him is quite limited, unless cash is involved. (In Arlen’s case, a LOT of
cash.)

On 2023-12-18 08:09, Wally J wrote:
> Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
>
>> Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
>> sacrifice their dignity to it.
>
> *To the adults on these childish Apple OS newsgroups...*
>
> a. [JR] The first person calls people "losers" & thinks that is clever.
> b. [Baker] The next calls people gay & thinks that's really clever.

I didn't call anyone gay, Arlen.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

> He could be furry or otherkin. Or into gadgetry.

What makes the iKooks iKooks is their religious fanaticism.
Not their ignorance, low IQ, and clear lack of education, per se.

Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.
a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.
b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.
c. iKook [Browne] calls people an "it", thinking that's oh so very clever.

Isn't that strange?
A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
C. Why?
--
Every iKook owns an intensely religious _hatred_ for facts about Apple.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

> They didn�t study that bank robber. That incident was used as an anecdote.
> From their Methods: �Participants were 65 Cornell University undergraduates
> from a variety of courses in psychology who earned extra credit for their
> participation� which translates to WEIRD kids.
>
> No surprise you can�t distinguish an illustrative anecdote from actual
> research, which has been challenged as being nothing more than a
> statistical exercise in seeing shapes in clouds.
>
> You�re not �studying� anything. You are again masturbating in public (as
> seen below):

I know exactly what they studied, Hemidactylus.
Here's a question for you which shows that you don't.

What's to the left of the first quartile line on English proficiency?
What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
--
Note that you have no idea what I'm asking, even as it's very simple.

On 2023-12-18 10:47, Wally J wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>> He could be furry or otherkin. Or into gadgetry.
>
> What makes the iKooks iKooks is their religious fanaticism.
> Not their ignorance, low IQ, and clear lack of education, per se.
>
> Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.
> a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.
> b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.

Who do you think I called "gay"? And what do the quotes mean in this
context, Arlen? Because normally they mean someone used that literal term...

....which I haven't.

:-)

WolfFan <akwolffan@zoho.com> wrote

> The supply of girls (or guys) willing to put up with him and others like
> him is quite limited, unless cash is involved. (In his case, a LOT of
> cash.)

I've studied the iKooks for years, and I think I understand them.

What makes the iKooks iKooks is their fact-free blind religious fanaticism.
Not their shocking ignorance, abnormally low IQ & lack of education.

Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.
a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.
b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.
c. iKook [Browne] calls people an "it", thinking that's oh so very clever.

Isn't that strange?
A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
C. Why?
--
Every iKook owns an intensely religious _hatred_ for facts about Apple.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

> It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again�KIt places the
> lotion in the basket.

Notice the iKooks _hate_ anyone who speaks facts about Apple products.
a. Facts are to be feared
b. People who state facts are to be feared

*Zealots holding religious belief systems _always fear facts_ by the way.*
*Everyone not a zealot, in fact... is to be feared.*

What makes the iKooks iKooks is their fact-free blind religious fanaticism.
Not their shocking ignorance, abnormally low IQ & lack of education.

Every iKook tries to make facts go away with their childish taunts.
a. iKook [JR] person calls people "losers" & he thinks that is clever.
b. iKook [Baker] calls people "gay" & thinks he's being very clever.
c. iKook [Browne] calls people an "it", thinking that's oh so very clever.

Isn't that strange?
A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
C. Why?
--
Every iKook owns an intensely religious _hatred_ for facts about Apple.

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>> They didn´t study that bank robber. That incident was used as an anecdote.
>> From their Methods: “Participants were 65 Cornell University undergraduates
>> from a variety of courses in psychology who earned extra credit for their
>> participation” which translates to WEIRD kids.
>>
>> No surprise you can´t distinguish an illustrative anecdote from actual
>> research, which has been challenged as being nothing more than a
>> statistical exercise in seeing shapes in clouds.
>>
>> You´re not “studying” anything. You are again masturbating in public (as
>> seen below):
>
> I know exactly what they studied, Hemidactylus.

Then why did you assume they actually studied McArthur Wheeler?

> Here's a question for you which shows that you don't.
>
> What's to the left of the first quartile line on English proficiency?

GIGO.

> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?

More GIGO.

I’m not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there’s nothing but shapes in
clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
you haven’t gotten the memo.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
> you haven't gotten the memo.

Don't worry Hemidactylus,

I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
up as racing terms) just as nospam constantly claims imaginary apps for iOS
that don't exist, just as Alan Baker always claims every fact is a lie,
etc.

Hemidactylus, Alan Browne, Snit, Alan Baker, Lewis, nospam, et al.

You iKooks all _hate_ facts.
You iKooks all _fear_ facts, in fact.

Hence, you fear (and hate) anyone who presents facts to an Apple newsgroup.

Yes, I know you iKooks better than you know yourselves, Hemidactylus.
a. None of you iKooks has an IQ that even approaches normal
b. None of you iKooks has any education above high school as a result
c. But worse, you're all completely ignorant of everything you speak about

You have no idea what a quartile is and yet it's used many times in the
seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus, as it's an important inflection point.

Every one of you strange iKooks owns completely imaginary belief systems.
None of you strange iKooks makes any assessment based on the facts.

*The iKooks is a religious zealot.*

Which, by the way, truth be told, is exactly the reason why Alan Browne
thinks that anyone who is not a religious zealot is an "it", and why Jolly
Roger thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is a "loser", and why
Alan Baker thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is "gay", etc.
--
The iKooks alone turn every conversation on Usenet into childish taunts.

On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
>> you haven't gotten the memo.
>
> Don't worry Hemidactylus,
>
> I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
> up as racing terms)
LOL!

Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.

Here's my page at DriverDB:

<https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>

Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:

<https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>

And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
instructors):

<https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>

That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.

'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
Training Program page.

Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
Most committee members have won championships in their class while
others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'

And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:

<https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>

'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>
>>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
>> you haven't gotten the memo.
>
> Don't worry Hemidactylus,
>
> I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
> up as racing terms) just as nospam constantly claims imaginary apps for iOS
> that don't exist, just as Alan Baker always claims every fact is a lie,
> etc.
>
> Hemidactylus, Alan Browne, Snit, Alan Baker, Lewis, nospam, et al.
>
> You iKooks all _hate_ facts.
> You iKooks all _fear_ facts, in fact.
>
> Hence, you fear (and hate) anyone who presents facts to an Apple newsgroup.
>
> Yes, I know you iKooks better than you know yourselves, Hemidactylus.
> a. None of you iKooks has an IQ that even approaches normal
> b. None of you iKooks has any education above high school as a result
> c. But worse, you're all completely ignorant of everything you speak about
>
> You have no idea what a quartile is and yet it's used many times in the
> seminal D-K papers, Hemidactylus, as it's an important inflection point.
>
> Every one of you strange iKooks owns completely imaginary belief systems.
> None of you strange iKooks makes any assessment based on the facts.
>
> *The iKooks is a religious zealot.*
>
> Which, by the way, truth be told, is exactly the reason why Alan Browne
> thinks that anyone who is not a religious zealot is an "it", and why Jolly
> Roger thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is a "loser", and why
> Alan Baker thinks anyone who is not a religious zealot is "gay", etc.

I posted multiple links showing the whole concept of D-K itself is flawed
and instead of acknowledging that you march out some trivial graphs and
still cling to the concept. This shows you are an uncritical ideologue. No
surprise there. It’s like me saying phrenology is flawed and pointing to
some expert debunkings and you asking me to examine a bump on your head
because head bumps are fundamental to understanding your idee fixe of
“iKooks”.

Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
> Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote
>
>> Regardless of its needs, no woman or man should be called upon to
>> sacrifice their dignity to it.
>
> *To the adults on these childish Apple OS newsgroups...*
>
> a. [JR] The first person calls people "losers" & thinks that is clever.
> b. [Baker] The next calls people gay & thinks that's really clever.
> b. [Browne] The third calls people an "it", thinking that's also clever.
>
> Isn't that strange?
> A. This doesn't happen on the adult operating systems newsgroups.
> B. It's only on the child-like Apple operating system newsgroups.
> C. Why?
>
> Specifically:
> *Why do you think these people repeatedly act & think like children do?*
>
> NOTE: It's their _only_ response to facts about Apple that they hate.

Somebody who brags about adulthood and expertise as you do is most likely
neither an adult nor expert in anything. The only reason you keep coming
here is to make up for some embarrassingly shameful shortcomings you must
have. We are forced to suffer the effects of your inadequacies and
insecurities. Nobody posts like you do without having some severe
psychological issues. Glad I’m not you. Schadenfreude is an amazing thing.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>
>>>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
>>
>> Don't worry Hemidactylus,
>>
>> I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
>> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
>> up as racing terms)
> LOL!
>
> Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
>
> Here's my page at DriverDB:
>
> <https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
>
> Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
>
> <https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
>
> And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
> instructors):
>
> <https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
>
> That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
>
> 'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
> Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
> preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
> to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
> Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
> under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
> Training Program page.
>
> Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
> committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
> Most committee members have won championships in their class while
> others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
> themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
>
> And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:
>
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
>
> 'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
>
Hah! Arlen is an F1 driver so there! You will respect his authority on all
things like he’s the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He’s
probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
in the Activity.

Or he’s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the
hours wasted in mommy’s basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups.
He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.

On 2023-12-18 14:07, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
>>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>>
>>>>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
>>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
>>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
>>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
>>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
>>>
>>> Don't worry Hemidactylus,
>>>
>>> I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
>>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
>>> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
>>> up as racing terms)
>> LOL!
>>
>> Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
>>
>> Here's my page at DriverDB:
>>
>> <https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
>>
>> Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
>>
>> <https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
>>
>> And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
>> instructors):
>>
>> <https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
>>
>> That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
>>
>> 'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
>> Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
>> preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
>> to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
>> Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
>> under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
>> Training Program page.
>>
>> Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
>> committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
>> Most committee members have won championships in their class while
>> others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
>> themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
>>
>> And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:
>>
>> <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
>>
>> 'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
>>
> Hah! Arlen is an F1 driver so there! You will respect his authority on all
> things like he’s the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He’s
> probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
> in the Activity.

But, but... ...he misspelled "beemer" as "beamer".

He can't possibly know ANYTHING!

LOL!

>
> Or he’s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the
> hours wasted in mommy’s basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups.
> He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.

Or, yeah... ...that's probably it.

:-)

On 2023-12-18 17:07, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2023-12-18 12:36, Wally J wrote:
>>> *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote
>>>
>>>>> What's to the right of the last D-K test result quartile, Hemidactylus?
>>>> I'm not playing your silly gotcha game with poorly put questions, Morlock.
>>>> If the D-K effect evaporates into artifact there's nothing but shapes in
>>>> clouds. The graphs mean nothing. That you are still clinging to D-K shows
>>>> you haven't gotten the memo.
>>>
>>> Don't worry Hemidactylus,
>>>
>>> I knew you never read their seminal papers, so you have no clue whom they
>>> studied, just like Alan Baker is a liar that he teaches racing since he
>>> doesn't even know the difference between a bimmer and a beamer (which grew
>>> up as racing terms)
>> LOL!
>>
>> Oh, Arlen... ...I don't need to lie.
>>
>> Here's my page at DriverDB:
>>
>> <https://www.driverdb.com/drivers/alan-baker>
>>
>> Here's me in my RF98 Van Diemen Honda:
>>
>> <https://martinsactionphotography.smugmug.com/2019-SCCBC-Race-6-Sunday-October-13-2019/i-cVjrfp9/A>
>>
>> And here is the Sports Car Club of BC Race Drivers Committee (i.e. the
>> instructors):
>>
>> <https://www.sccbc.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/dt-7-scaled-1800x650.jpg>
>>
>> That's me kneeling by the front wheel in the sunglasses.
>>
>> 'The Race Drivers Committee organizes and operates the SCCBC Race Driver
>> Training Program. The driver training program is an important part of
>> preparing to enter the sport of racing at Mission and is a prerequisite
>> to acquiring a Novice race license. The twice annual Race Driver
>> Training program provides unparalleled instruction on handling vehicles
>> under extreme conditions. For more information, visit the Race Drivers
>> Training Program page.
>>
>> Membership on the Race Drivers Committee is by invitation only. The
>> committee is comprised of some of the best racers in British Columbia.
>> Most committee members have won championships in their class while
>> others have done consistently well over the years and have proven
>> themselves capable of excelling in all race conditions.'
>>
>> And here's the archived version of the page on the Race Drivers Committee:
>>
>> <https://web.archive.org/web/20230422005048/https://www.sccbc.net/about-sccbc/race-drivers/>
>>
>> 'Race Drivers Committee Chairman Alan Baker'
>>
> Hah! Arlen is an F1 driver so there! You will respect his authority on all
> things like he’s the know-it-all version of Cartman from South Park. He’s
> probably a pilot, yachtsman, and former Delta operator who spent a decade
> in the Activity.

At a bar near him it's claimed he's also a Nobel Laureate in Physics,
Economics and Literature as well as a Fields Medal double dipper.

> Or he’s just an empty braggart with no life and nothing to show for all the
> hours wasted in mommy’s basement being an obnoxious snot on usenet groups.
> He should thank us all profusely for even recognizing he exists.

--
“Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent.”
- John Maynard Keynes.

*Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid> wrote

> Somebody who brags about adulthood and expertise as you do is most likely
> neither an adult nor expert in anything.

Hi Hemidactylus,

I study all you strange iKooks so I likely know you better than you know
yourself, especially I study why you hate the truth about Apple products.

What separates iKooks mostly from normal people is that iKooks are strange
religious zealots who don't understand facts and who are ignorant of them.

Yet, iKooks form completely imaginary belief systems based on no facts.
*Which is why iKooks are so deathly afraid of facts.*
*And of the mere messenger bearing facts.*

Hence, you have to admit, iKooks are very strange people indeed, so when
you try to claim I don't have the education that I do, think again please.

Tell that to Chris who fabricated a PhD in the biological sciences and yet
he immediately ridiculed the use of "vehicle" in terms of immunology.

HINT: Nobody who took even one immunology class would say thats that.

Same as Alan Baker who insists that he "teaches racing" and owns a BMW and
yet he doesn't even know the first thing about what BMW racing vehicles are
called. Similar with Alan Browne who claims to understand how Apple
products work and yet he's never once ever heard of the walled garden.
Likewise with Jolly Roger who claims to understand how Apple releases
software and yet for years claimed a lie that simply wasn't true (i.e.,
Apple only fully supports a single release for Mac and/or iOS is the only
truth there is despite Jolly Roger claiming otherwise for years on end).

It's the same with you, Hemidactylus. Liars you iKooks are. All liars.
You don't know the first thing about the D-K research papers.

Hell, you don't even know what's to the left of the first quartile mark and
what's to the right of the last one - which is fundamental to their
research.

*If you don't even know that - you know absolutely nothing, Hemidactylus.*

Which was my point.
You "think" you understand D-K but it's clear you've _never_ read the
papers (hence, you know absolutely nothing about what those graphs mean).

You don't even know about the English test, for example, Hemidactylus.
That's how ignorant you are.

And that's OK.
But you can't _claim_ to be "not ignorant" when it's clear you are.
*That's what iKooks do*, Hemidactylus.

> The only reason you keep coming
> here is to make up for some embarrassingly shameful shortcomings you must
> have. We are forced to suffer the effects of your inadequacies and
> insecurities. Nobody posts like you do without having some severe
> psychological issues. Glad I�m not you. Schadenfreude is an amazing thing.

No. You're wrong. I've told you iKooks many times why I'm here. You just
are too stupid to comprehend that people are actually honest and tell the
truth about Apple products.

It astounds you, in fact, that there are people that don't lie to defend
Apple's honor to the death, Hemidactylus.

You're disappointed, in fact, that there are people who do NOT gloat about
how much profit Apple makes off of the ignorant iKooks, Hemidactylus.

It shocks you that anyone would tell the truth about Apple, Hemidactylus.
So be it.
--
I'm here to learn from others and to add value to the topic, and, for the
child-like Apple newsgroups, I'm here to show the iKooks for what they are.