On 2/21/2024 10:58 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 8:54:46 PM UTC-8, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:17:25 +0700, John B. <sloc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:52:42 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>>> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Why do you claim that That dam wasn't filled in with mud when it is clearly visible on Google Earth?
>>>> https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70429821,-122.05628952,76.5306297a,255.97127499d,35y,44.42002901h,0t,0r/data=OgMKATA
>>
>>> Nope no dam
>> This shows the dam and spillway.
>> <https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70385425,-122.05525804,81.20348933a,126.35610161d,35y,61.89189098h,60.41275115t,0r/data=OgMKATA>
>> Looking back in time with Google Earth Pro, I find that the area
>> behind the dam was flooded up to about 2019. I found some photos that
>> showed quite a bit of mud in the area formerly flooded with water.
>> There's a small pond in the upper left which I guess is the remains of
>> the water. No clue where Tom's bicycle path is located.
>> <https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70521068,-122.05524783,76.4840557a,480.82115293d,35y,34.38173018h,60.15388337t,0.00000085r/data=OgMKATA>
>>>> Why do you claim that there isn't a sign when I have shown it a dozen or more times?
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1063064831504932&set=pob.100034042758783
>>
>>> Nope. No sign.
>> I keep looking at the Google Earth photos and the photo of the sign.
>> It might seem like the same place but I can't be certain. Facebook
>> strips off the EXIF info from all photos so I can't verify the
>> location. There's no mud visible in the facebook photo.
>>
>> Tom, if you had posted that link to your photo 12 times since you
>> posted it to Facebook on Jan 3, your critics and I would have surely
>> seen it and add appropriate comments. I did a quick search with
>> Google Groups for the Facebook URL.
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fphoto%2F%3Ffbid%3D1063064831504932%26set%3Dpob.100034042758783+author%3ATom+author%3AKunich>
>> Nothing found except John's posting. Tom, you're lying (again).
>>
>> There's also a problem with the Facebook photo. The sign does not
>> show a shadow while the small trees behind it show very distinctive
>> shadows. I would call this a bad fake photo.
>>
>> There might be a problem with my Usenet news provider, Supernews. It
>> might also be a problem on Tom's end because he just switched to
>> NewsHosting.com. The only reason I saw his article was that it was
>> partially included with John's reply. Tom's article did appear in
>> Google Groups as:
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QfPkRcblWoU/m/NjW-v2kWAQAJ>
>> No clue what happened but I'll try to find out tomorrow.
>> --
>> Jeff Liebermann je...@cruzio.com
>> PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
>> Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
>> Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
>
> Liebermann, your mind is showing.

If that was attempted o be an insult, it was a typical kunich failure.

> You are absolutely certain that I would take a picture from somewhere else in order to fool you.

Wouldn't surprise me in the least. Your the one that posts a chart of
the stock market during the first 18 months of the Obama administration
claiming it "proves" he "destroyed" the economy, while purposely
omitting the last year of the Bush jr. showing the housing crash, or the
last years for the obama years showing the stock market (and the
economy) all reaching record highs.

You're the one who claims there were only ever 8000ish deaths from
covid, claiming the information is on the CDC website under "other
respiratory diseases" while that same page has a chart specifically
dedicated to covid deaths.

It shouldn't be a surprise that we might consider any photographic
"evidence" you post to be bogus.

> You are just as certain that I don't have any money.

I am too. In fact, I would suggest anyone here who has read you claims
of massive wealth suspects otherwise as well.

> You also believe that I am taking a bicycle path up Cull Canyon rather than the road. Your mind is so screwed up that you are indeed one pitiful creature trying their hardest to believe they aren't.

Projection duly noted.

--
Add xx to reply

On 2/22/2024 2:43 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:58:44 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
> <cyclintom@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 8:54:46?PM UTC-8, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 07:17:25 +0700, John B. <sloc...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:52:42 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>>>> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Why do you claim that That dam wasn't filled in with mud when it is clearly visible on Google Earth?
>>>>> https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70429821,-122.05628952,76.5306297a,255.97127499d,35y,44.42002901h,0t,0r/data=OgMKATA
>>>
>>>> Nope no dam
>>> This shows the dam and spillway.
>>> <https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70385425,-122.05525804,81.20348933a,126.35610161d,35y,61.89189098h,60.41275115t,0r/data=OgMKATA>
>>> Looking back in time with Google Earth Pro, I find that the area
>>> behind the dam was flooded up to about 2019. I found some photos that
>>> showed quite a bit of mud in the area formerly flooded with water.
>>> There's a small pond in the upper left which I guess is the remains of
>>> the water. No clue where Tom's bicycle path is located.
>>> <https://earth.google.com/web/@37.70521068,-122.05524783,76.4840557a,480.82115293d,35y,34.38173018h,60.15388337t,0.00000085r/data=OgMKATA>
>>>>> Why do you claim that there isn't a sign when I have shown it a dozen or more times?
>>>>> https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1063064831504932&set=pob.100034042758783
>>>
>>>> Nope. No sign.
>>> I keep looking at the Google Earth photos and the photo of the sign.
>>> It might seem like the same place but I can't be certain. Facebook
>>> strips off the EXIF info from all photos so I can't verify the
>>> location. There's no mud visible in the facebook photo.
>>>
>>> Tom, if you had posted that link to your photo 12 times since you
>>> posted it to Facebook on Jan 3, your critics and I would have surely
>>> seen it and add appropriate comments. I did a quick search with
>>> Google Groups for the Facebook URL.
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fphoto%2F%3Ffbid%3D1063064831504932%26set%3Dpob.100034042758783+author%3ATom+author%3AKunich>
>>> Nothing found except John's posting. Tom, you're lying (again).
>>>
>>> There's also a problem with the Facebook photo. The sign does not
>>> show a shadow while the small trees behind it show very distinctive
>>> shadows. I would call this a bad fake photo.
>>>
>>> There might be a problem with my Usenet news provider, Supernews. It
>>> might also be a problem on Tom's end because he just switched to
>>> NewsHosting.com. The only reason I saw his article was that it was
>>> partially included with John's reply. Tom's article did appear in
>>> Google Groups as:
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/QfPkRcblWoU/m/NjW-v2kWAQAJ>
>>> No clue what happened but I'll try to find out tomorrow.
>
>> Liebermann, your mind is showing.
>
> Yep, it's difficult to hide. However, I'll confess to wearing a Greek
> fisherman's hat while using my desktop computer.
>
>> You are absolutely certain that I would take a picture from somewhere
>> else in order to fool you.
>
> I'm not absolutely certain of anything. I deal in probabilities.
>
> I don't know where the Facebook picture was taken. It's not up to me
> to prove that you faked the photo. It's your photo, so you get to
> demonstrate that it's genuine. You can start by explaining why there
> is no shadow behind the sign while there are shadows behind the trees.
>
>> You are just as certain that I don't have any money.
>
> I'm not certain, but it's likely. The major indication is that you
> don't act like someone who has real money (millions). People change
> when they have money. Mostly, the become more conservative discussing
> their wealth because wealth attracts attention and attention attracts
> thieves, crooks, scammers, tax collectors, etc. Another indication is
> that you have demonstrated that the amazing facts you regurgitate in
> RBT have consistently been proven wrong or at least unlikely. The
> number of lies, fabrications, and contrived numbers is truly
> astronomical. With such a track record of falsehood, it's fairly easy
> for me to assume that your wealth is an illusion.
>
>> You also believe that I am taking a bicycle path up Cull Canyon
>> rather than the road.
>
> Actually, I thought about that looking at the Google Earth photos. The
> road is an obvious path for bicycle riding. When you previous claimed
> that there were blackened burn marks on the Cull Canyon roadway where
> EV's had burned to the ground, it was obvious that you were riding on
> the road and not on the bicycle path. I wouldn't give this guesswork
> a "probable" but I think it's "possible" that you preferred to ride on
> the roadway.
>
>> Your mind is so screwed up that you are indeed one pitiful
>> creature trying their hardest to believe they aren't.
>
> Why would I want and what would I do with your pity?
>
> BTW, "one pitiful creature" is singular. Therefore, I suggest you
> replace the word "their" with "its" or "his", and "they aren't" with
> "he isn't".

Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/

--
Add xx to reply

On 2/22/2024 6:28 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 02:58:08 -0800 (PST), "funkma...@hotmail.com"
> <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 10:33:01?AM UTC-5, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:26:18 -0500, Frank Krygowski
>>> <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/21/2024 6:01 AM, zen cycle wrote:
>>>>> On 2/21/2024 3:18 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:19:55 -0500, Frank Krygowski
>>>>>> <frkr...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/20/2024 7:55 PM, Luns Tee wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, February 1, 2024 at 6:19:20?PM UTC-8, Jeff Liebermann
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 14:39:25 -0800 (PST), Tom Kunich
>>>>>>>>> <cycl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have a lot of stop signs and stop lights on the way I ride so I
>>>>>>>>>> can spend 5 or more minutes at a stop waiting for lights to change
>>>>>>>>>> or traffic whose turn it is to pass.
>>>>>>>>> Wrong (as usual). Recommended cycle length in California is 120
>>>>>>>>> seconds. Typical is 80 to 180 seconds. None of the signals I've seen
>>>>>>>>> have ever taken your 5 min (300 seconds) to cycle.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are intersections where green is given only if a vehicle is
>>>>>>>> detected. Often the vehicle sensor is calibrated such that a bicycle
>>>>>>>> will not register, and I've had instances of waiting through two
>>>>>>>> full cycles of the light without getting a green. The most recent
>>>>>>>> instance I can remember was waiting for a left turn arrow from
>>>>>>>> Windemere Parkway onto Camino Tassajara in San Ramon. I don't know
>>>>>>>> if I've waited a full 5 minutes though, and now knowing to
>>>>>>>> anticipate this when there are no left-turning cars, I just hop off
>>>>>>>> my bike to cross as a pedestrian rather than wait for a cycle.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Some here have simple minded fun claiming there's nothing to learn about
>>>>>>> riding a bike.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Krygowski's bicycling classes will also instruct you on how to mount
>>>>>> and dismount your bicycle.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe if you took that class you wouldnt need to ride a tricycle
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>> I'm pretty sure I was riding a two wheel bicycle before either of you
>>
>> <eyeroll>
>> more undocumented anecdotes from the floriduh dumbass
>
> See the "I'm pretty sure" reference, Dummy. IOW, it was only my
> opinion.

Dumbass shows he not only doesn't understand what a strawman is, but he
doesn't understand what an anecdote is.

>
>>> two sissy-boys were potty trained.
>>
>> 1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a closeted queer, afraid people will find out.
>
> I was not aware that being a sissy is the same thing as being "queer,"

Dumbasses willful ignorance on display

> but you seem to know more about being "queer" than I, so I will defer
> to your implied definition and say that I don't have any reason to
> believe you are "queer."

I know more about most things than you do, except how to proudly wallow
in willful ignorance.
>
> I was only referring to what seems to be Krygowski and your only
> non-employment related accomplishments. That'd be riding bicycles,
> something that many women and children do.

Unlike you, I don't brag about OT accomplishments unless it's brought up
in context.

--
Add xx to reply

On 2/21/2024 11:39 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 8:58:21 p.m. UTC-6, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 2/21/2024 5:27 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:45:27 -0500, Catrike Ryder
>>> <Sol...@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:40:59 -0500, Catrike Ryder
>>>> <Sol...@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:55:44 +0700, John B. <sloc...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> But did he get a degree? He brags about a PE - professional Engineer
>>>>>> - license but never mentions attending collage.
>>>>>> https://www.studyforfe.com/blog/how-to-obtain-a-pe-license-without-a-degree/
>> :-) John, one doesn't get an Ohio Professional Engineering license
>> without an appropriate degree in engineering. See
>> https://peps.ohio.gov/wps/wcm/connect/gov/a79a8dc0-dcad-4ff0-a0e6-3107d17fffc2/PE+Licensure+Guidelines+Sept+2022.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE.Z18_M1HGGIK0N0JO00QO9DDDDM3000-a79a8dc0-dcad-4ff0-a0e6-3107d17fffc2-oefmY3.
>>>>> Interesting question...
>>>>
>>>> Does he even have a PE licence?
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting that Krygowski missed this chance to back up his claims
>>> with a few braggs.
>> The framed license is above my desk as I type. So is the one for
>> Pennsylvania. Of course I can post and link to a photo - but I'm back in
>> the usual conundrum: If I don't post evidence, I'm making things up. If
>> I do post evidence, I'm bragging.
>>
>> This is like arguing with fourth graders.
>>
>> Why don't John and the tricycle rider post about their educations? (I
>> suspect it's because they match Tom's.)
>>
>> --
>> - Frank Krygowski
>
> So many of these threads remind me of fourth graders or younger arguing in a schoolyard. Lots of noise but little of substance. It's sad really as this used to be such a great and useful BICYCLING related newsgroup.
>
> Cheers

+1

I skip over invective and remote amateur psychoanalysis. meh.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

On 2/22/2024 6:06 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 4:04:24 AM UTC-5,floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>
>>
>> But never mind, state issued licenses are remarkably easy to verify.
>>
>> https://elicense.ohio.gov/oh_verifylicense

I'm retired for a long time now, and had no reason to retain my PE
licenses. AFAIK Ohio doesn't make expired license data available, but my
license number was PE59034.

Pennsylvania does have info on retired PEs. My Pennsylvania PE license
was PE044699E.

But it's really weird that some people here spend so much time stalking me.

--
- Frank Krygowski

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:45:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!
>https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/

For a while, he was using the royal we instead of just himself:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we>
I think he was trying to give the illusion of having a large crowd of
supporters.
--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:42:29 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>On 2/21/2024 10:58 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
>> Liebermann, your mind is showing.
>
>If that was attempted o be an insult, it was a typical kunich failure.

I think he meant it as a compliment. I do try to have an open mind.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-mindedness>

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

On 2/22/2024 12:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:45:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!
>> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/
>
> For a while, he was using the royal we instead of just himself:
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we>
> I think he was trying to give the illusion of having a large crowd of
> supporters.

I would walk out of any interaction in which I was asked for
'personal pronoun preference'. In the few instances where I
was asked for my first name I replied 'Mr Muzi will do'.
--
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971

On 2/22/2024 2:24 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>
> I would walk out of any interaction in which I was asked for 'personal
> pronoun preference'.  In the few instances where I was asked for my
> first name I replied 'Mr Muzi will do'.

I've thought about coining my own pronouns. Why be oppressed into using
words that others already recognize as pronouns?

I'm considering saying "My pronouns are bartleflast and ploggin."

--
- Frank Krygowski

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:14:12 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On 2/22/2024 6:06 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 4:04:24?AM UTC-5,floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> But never mind, state issued licenses are remarkably easy to verify.
>>>
>>> https://elicense.ohio.gov/oh_verifylicense
>
>I'm retired for a long time now, and had no reason to retain my PE
>licenses. AFAIK Ohio doesn't make expired license data available, but my
>license number was PE59034.

Of the 5 Krygowski's listed on that site, 2 are inactive, 2 are
expired. One of them appears to have the same address as Frank.

>Pennsylvania does have info on retired PEs. My Pennsylvania PE license
>was PE044699E.
>
>But it's really weird that some people here spend so much time stalking me.

It didn't take much time. Only took a few seconds. I knew how to do it
because.....

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:24:12 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>On 2/22/2024 12:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:45:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!
>>> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/
>>
>> For a while, he was using the royal we instead of just himself:
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we>
>> I think he was trying to give the illusion of having a large crowd of
>> supporters.
>
>I would walk out of any interaction in which I was asked for
>'personal pronoun preference'. In the few instances where I
>was asked for my first name I replied 'Mr Muzi will do'.

I'd walk out of any interaction where somebody told me what their
pronouns are.

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:24:12 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>On 2/22/2024 12:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:45:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!
>>> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/
>>
>> For a while, he was using the royal we instead of just himself:
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we>
>> I think he was trying to give the illusion of having a large crowd of
>> supporters.
>
>I would walk out of any interaction in which I was asked for
>'personal pronoun preference'. In the few instances where I
>was asked for my first name I replied 'Mr Muzi will do'.

That's probably a good method for converting an interaction into a
duel.

You are limited to 16 possible personal pronouns.
<http://www.csun.edu/~sk36711/WWW/KAG/ch7.html>
In Modern English the personal pronouns include: "I," "you," "he,"
"she," "it," "we," "they," "them," "us," "him," "her," "his," "hers,"
"its," "theirs," "our," "your."

--
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> On 2/22/2024 12:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 07:45:59 -0500, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't you heard Jeff? Tommy has joined the "woke" crowd!
>>> https://www.grammarly.com/blog/use-the-singular-they/
>>
>> For a while, he was using the royal we instead of just himself:
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we>
>> I think he was trying to give the illusion of having a large crowd of
>> supporters.
>
> I would walk out of any interaction in which I was asked for
> 'personal pronoun preference'. In the few instances where I
> was asked for my first name I replied 'Mr Muzi will do'.

Doesn’t seem to happen in real life some folks have them listed on there
emails or similar but that’s about it and probably forgotten about to be
honest.

Note that trans folks are 0.5% of population so hardly likely to be
encountered regularly!

Roger Merriman

On 2/22/2024 6:08 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 13:14:12 -0500, Frank Krygowski
> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2/22/2024 6:06 AM, funkma...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> On Thursday, February 22, 2024 at 4:04:24?AM UTC-5,floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> But never mind, state issued licenses are remarkably easy to verify.
>>>>
>>>> https://elicense.ohio.gov/oh_verifylicense
>>
>> I'm retired for a long time now, and had no reason to retain my PE
>> licenses. AFAIK Ohio doesn't make expired license data available, but my
>> license number was PE59034.
>
> Of the 5 Krygowski's listed on that site, 2 are inactive, 2 are
> expired. One of them appears to have the same address as Frank.
>
>> Pennsylvania does have info on retired PEs. My Pennsylvania PE license
>> was PE044699E.
>>
>> But it's really weird that some people here spend so much time stalking me.
>
> It didn't take much time. Only took a few seconds. I knew how to do it
> because.....

You're a narcissistic willfully ignorant dumbass with daddy issues
projecting onto frank.

You're welcome

--
Add xx to reply

On 2/23/2024 7:30 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
> On 2/22/2024 6:08 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>> I knew how to do it because.....
>
>  You're a narcissistic willfully ignorant dumbass with daddy issues
> projecting onto frank.
>
> You're welcome

He certainly has a strong compulsion about me! Seems unhealthy, maybe
unnatural!

But let's recall, his and John's latest little tizzy was a claim that I
never had a Professional Engineering license.

I'm sure both those impotent old codgers will now give me a courteous
apology. (Hah!) :-)

--
- Frank Krygowski

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:28:34 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>On 2/23/2024 7:30 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
>> On 2/22/2024 6:08 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>> I knew how to do it because.....
>>
>>  You're a narcissistic willfully ignorant dumbass with daddy issues
>> projecting onto frank.
>>
>> You're welcome
>
>He certainly has a strong compulsion about me! Seems unhealthy, maybe
>unnatural!

That's from the guy that has almost continously sputtered, insulted,
and berated me things that have no tangible effect on him.

I do enjoy it, but seriously, the irony bell is ringing loudly..

>But let's recall, his and John's latest little tizzy was a claim that I
>never had a Professional Engineering license.
>
>I'm sure both those impotent old codgers will now give me a courteous
>apology. (Hah!) :-)

I never made any such claim. I simply wondered about it. I'm still
wondering about the second one (Ohio), but I'm happy to acknowledge
his wife's licence.

On 2/23/2024 4:50 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 16:28:34 -0500, Frank Krygowski
> <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2/23/2024 7:30 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
>>> On 2/22/2024 6:08 PM, floriduh dumbass wrote:
>>>> I knew how to do it because.....
>>>
>>>  You're a narcissistic willfully ignorant dumbass with daddy issues
>>> projecting onto frank.
>>>
>>> You're welcome
>>
>> He certainly has a strong compulsion about me! Seems unhealthy, maybe
>> unnatural!
>
> That's from the guy that has almost continously sputtered, insulted,
> and berated me things that have no tangible effect on him.

What a whiney little shit.

>
> I do enjoy it, but seriously, the irony bell is ringing loudly..

We can add irony to the list of thinks the dumbass doesn't understand

>
>> But let's recall, his and John's latest little tizzy was a claim that I
>> never had a Professional Engineering license.
>>
>> I'm sure both those impotent old codgers will now give me a courteous
>> apology. (Hah!) :-)
>
> I never made any such claim. I simply wondered about it. I'm still
> wondering about the second one (Ohio), but I'm happy to acknowledge
> his wife's licence.

That's from a guy who continously sputters, insults, and berates frank
things that have no tangible effect on him.

--
Add xx to reply