On 2024-01-02, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
> On 2024-01-02 9:10 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-01-02, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>> On 2024-01-01 11:25 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-01, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-01-01 12:37 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-01, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2023-12-31 4:57 p.m., soup wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 14:42, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 30, 2023 at 5:46:49 AM UTC-5, Blue Lives Matter
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> …
>>>>>>>>>> There's a very good reason for a woman to have a condom, Dumbass, but
>>>>>>>>>> absolutly no reason for a man to have a tampon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ”Hey Siri!  Give me a phrase that will show us a man who’s never been
>>>>>>>>> married.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Are you insinuating that married men all carry about tampons as their
>>>>>>>> wives may need them?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   I am married and have never carried a tampon .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been married since 2009 and have never needed to carry a tampon.
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the leftists our societies keep voting in are influenced
>>>>>>> too heavily by people with obvious mental illnesses and they're too
>>>>>>> cowardly to tell them that what they spout is complete bullshit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Their mental illnesses (and their inability to deal logically with them)
>>>>>> wouldn't be that big of a deal to me if they left children alone and didn't
>>>>>> try to coerce me into their delusional world. Just because they have
>>>>>> trouble grasping the obvious doesn't mean they have to include me into their
>>>>>> idiocy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a lot more radical than that. If I had tremendous political power,
>>>>> I'd force these people into state-sponsored mental asylums where they
>>>>> would be able to live a satisfying life of lobotomies and shock therapy,
>>>>> whatever will convince men that they aren't women and the inverse. I
>>>>> have no patience for these people and find them both repulsive and
>>>>> reprehensible. To me, they are little more than beings possessed by
>>>>> demons and evidence of the hold Satan has on society.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm aware that this will trigger Joel Crump and make him cry as he sucks
>>>>> his next "girl cock." Nevertheless, I don't give a shit. I have no
>>>>> tolerance for any modern interpretation of Christianity which suggests
>>>>> that these demons have a soul too.
>>>>
>>>> The insanity gets even more insane. Apparently morons in the state of New
>>>> South Wales, Australia now want to ban the words "brother" and "sister" in
>>>> official documents. You can't make up this asininity, it's just too stupid.
>>>
>>> However, this is the kind of garbage that the West has voted in. They
>>> received a ton of warnings that the left had no respect for democracy,
>>> wanted to push a divide between races, religions and sexes and would
>>> spend the people's money as if it were their own bank account. However,
>>> they did not care because those leftist politicians promised them that
>>> they too would get some free stuff in the form of table scraps.
>>
>> We didn't vote this in. Our votes mean nothing, as they make it up as they
>> go. Until we have paper ballots and real accountability every election can
>> (and probably will) be stolen. Look what Russia does. Paper ballots in clear
>> plastic ballot boxes, with a camera focused on each ballot box. Nothing AT
>> ALL like that in the U.S.
>
> Of course not, because such a thing would somehow be racist.
>
>>> Honestly, I blame young White women. The moment they enter College,
>>> their naivety becomes their downfall and they believe every word of what
>>> their Communist sympathizer professor tells them. They then spend the
>>> next two decades favouring whichever politician leans most heavily
>>> toward Marxism. Only once they are 40, alone and miserable do they
>>> realize that their feminism, atheism and socialism were the causes. A
>>> woman I've known since she was 12 is the perfect example of this. She
>>> spent 27 years sleeping around, chasing career and the illusion that
>>> only Prince Charming was deserving of her cunt. Then, at 39, when she
>>> realized that everybody around but her was happy with their families and
>>> husbands, she decided to get herself impregnated by some stranger and
>>> become a single mother. I'm sure that decision won't come back to bite
>>> her in her ever-expanding ass.
>>
>> Kids don't have anything to anchor to any more. So they float on the tide
>> and allow themselves to navigate by emotion rather than logic.
>
> Which would explain why they're such pussies and obese by the age of 14.

Yep. They're trying to turn girls into shrill, little boys and boys into
whimpering little sooks. But my son tells me that the newest generation of
school kids are rebelling against this Woke bullshit. If true, I can
understand why, the Woke morons have lost all sense of proportion. They keep
trying to lather on the lying Woke bullshit thicker and thicker. Naturally
kids will rebel against that. I hope my son has it right. I'm extremely
happy that none of my kids went to public schools. They missed all their
brainwashing sessions.

--
Freedom. Use it or lose it.

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-01-02, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Or do you know of any man who has ever carried a baby to term in his
>>>> non-womb? Just too stupid to take seriously and yet, in the most idiotic
>>>> countries, like the Nordic ones, you can be put in jail for teaching that
>>>> men can't have babies. This is utter insanity.
>>>
>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>> "issues".
>>
>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>> about tolerating faggots.
>
>There's a difference between forgiving the sinner and tolerating the sin.
>St. Paul was pretty clear on this point in Romans 1...
>
> 23 And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness
> of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted
> beasts, and of creeping things. 24 Wherefore God gave them up to the
> desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonour their own bodies
> among themselves. 25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and
> worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is
> blessed for ever. Amen.
>
> 26 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their
> women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature.
> 27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the
> women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men
> working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense
> which was due to their error. 28 And as they liked not to have God in
> their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those
> things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all iniquity,
> malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder,
> contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, 30 Detractors, hateful to God,
> contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to
> parents, 31 Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity,
> without mercy. 32 Who, having known the justice of God, did not
> understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not
> only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

You wanna know something? My dad was the soul of the apostle Paul. He
died in 2007, RIP. He understood that my bisexuality wasn't something
that mattered, ultimately, it didn't have anything to do with the kind
of person I actually was. My mom is well aware my GF is transgender,
today. You should grow up and learn that God's creation does include
what you are showing disdain for.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>
> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
> but celebrated.

Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria.

--
You can do very well in speculation where land or anything to do with dirt
is concerned.

RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>> "issues".
>
> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
> about tolerating faggots.

Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.

No "Jewish media" has taught me anything. I actually grew up Catholic and in
grade school we attended Mass every day and had Bible classes every day.

Let's hope the fortune below is correct.

--
You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot today.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>
>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>> but celebrated.
>
>Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria

What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
penises and boys can have vaginas?

How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?

What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
always meant, and still do today.

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>>>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>
>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>> but celebrated.
>>
>>Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>
>What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
>they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
>penises and boys can have vaginas?

Look, transphobe dummies are full of BS like you just spouted, but
it's not what the data shows. Get with the times.

>How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?

Phobe parents *must* be shut out of how this is addressed by the
professionals at public school, to protect the child from abusive
phobe attitudes and behaviors at home.

>What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
>always meant, and still do today.

Fuckin' Trump supporter.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>
>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>> but celebrated.
>
> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria.

Yeah because organized drag queen "story hour" doesn't exist. It's all made
up. Never mind that it isn't as numerous articles clearly show. And forcing
kids to use Woke bullshit terms like one of the many asinine made up
"genders" doesn't exist either. Right? If you're that gullible, I've got a
bridge in Brooklyn you may be interested in buying.

Sorry, Chris but your bullshit "canard" claim is the lying canard pushed by
the Woke liars when they get caught pushing their crap on kids. Sending your
kids to public school now is child abuse. Convincing kids to mutilate
themselves (to "change genders") when they haven't even reached puberty is
sickening. Actually satanic — destroying childhood innocence. Anyone pushes
this crap on kids is a vile slimeball.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>
>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>> but celebrated.
>>
>>Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>
> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
> penises and boys can have vaginas?

Did you even bother to read the quotation concerning "intersex"?

> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?

That would be bad, but how often are there "radical leftists" running schools
in Puritan America? And how often are the parents left out of the equation?

> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
> always meant, and still do today.

Generally the terms are easily applied. In some cases they are not. That's
simply a biological and social fact.

--
Alas, how love can trifle with itself!
-- William Shakespeare, "The Two Gentlemen of Verona"

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>>>the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>>
>> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
>> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
>> penises and boys can have vaginas?
>
>Did you even bother to read the quotation concerning "intersex"?

Intersex people, to be fair, to either have (a) Y chromosome(s) or
not, we can determine the biological sex of a person, but trans
people's identity is nonetheless real and valid.

>> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>
>That would be bad, but how often are there "radical leftists" running schools
>in Puritan America? And how often are the parents left out of the equation?

Parents leave themselves out.

>> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
>> always meant, and still do today.
>
>Generally the terms are easily applied. In some cases they are not. That's
>simply a biological and social fact.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>> "issues".
>>
>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>> about tolerating faggots.
>
> Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.

He loved them enough to tell them they would go to hell if they didn't
repent. That's what true love is. "Take up your cross and follow me." Not
"Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die."

1 I BESEECH you therefore, brethren, by the mercy of God, that you present
your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing unto God, your reasonable
service. 2 And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the
newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the
acceptable, and the perfect will of God. — Romans 12

6 Whosoever abideth in him, sinneth not; and whosoever sinneth, hath not
seen him, nor known him. 7 Little children, let no man deceive you. He
that doth justice is just, even as he is just. 8 He that committeth sin is
of the devil: for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose,
the Son of God appeared, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9
Whosoever is born of God, committeth not sin: for his seed abideth in him,
and he can not sin, because he is born of God. 10 In this the children of
God are manifest, and the children of the devil. Whosoever is not just, is
not of God, nor he that loveth not his brother. — I John 3

How many times did Jesus say, "Go forth and sin no more?" He loved sinners
and died to save their souls but if they persist in sin, they will be judged
guilty.

31 Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons
of them that killed the prophets. 32 Fill ye up then the measure of your
fathers. 33 You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from
the judgment of hell? 34 Therefore behold I send to you prophets, and
wise men, and scribes: and some of them you will put to death and
crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from
city to city: 35 That upon you may come all the just blood that hath
been shed upon the earth, from the blood of Abel the just, even unto the
blood of Zacharias the son of Barachias, whom you killed between the
temple and the altar.

36 Amen I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation. 37
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them
that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy
children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou
wouldest not? 38 Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate. 39 For
I say to you, you shall not see me henceforth till you say: Blessed is he
that cometh in the name of the Lord. — Matthew 23

Christ loved sinners and wanted to heal them. But he did not tolerate their
sins. And if they persisted in those sins they would be damned.

3 And (Jesus) said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become
as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. 4
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the
greater in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And he that shall receive one such
little child in my name, receiveth me.

6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in
me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his
neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe to the
world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but
nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh. — Matthew 18

Those who destroy the innocence of children are the scum of the earth. God
will not forget.

> No "Jewish media" has taught me anything. I actually grew up Catholic and in
> grade school we attended Mass every day and had Bible classes every day.
>
> Let's hope the fortune below is correct.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>>> "issues".
>>>
>>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>>> about tolerating faggots.
>>
>> Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.
>
>He loved them enough to tell them they would go to hell if they didn't
>repent. That's what true love is. "Take up your cross and follow me." Not
>"Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die."
>
> 1 I BESEECH you therefore, brethren, by the mercy of God, that you present
> your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing unto God, your reasonable
> service. 2 And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the
> newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the
> acceptable, and the perfect will of God. — Romans 12
>
> 6 Whosoever abideth in him, sinneth not; and whosoever sinneth, hath not
> seen him, nor known him. 7 Little children, let no man deceive you. He
> that doth justice is just, even as he is just. 8 He that committeth sin is
> of the devil: for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose,
> the Son of God appeared, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9
> Whosoever is born of God, committeth not sin: for his seed abideth in him,
> and he can not sin, because he is born of God. 10 In this the children of
> God are manifest, and the children of the devil. Whosoever is not just, is
> not of God, nor he that loveth not his brother. — I John 3
>
>How many times did Jesus say, "Go forth and sin no more?" He loved sinners
>and died to save their souls but if they persist in sin, they will be judged
>guilty.
>
> 31 Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons
> of them that killed the prophets. 32 Fill ye up then the measure of your
> fathers. 33 You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from
> the judgment of hell? 34 Therefore behold I send to you prophets, and
> wise men, and scribes: and some of them you will put to death and
> crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from
> city to city: 35 That upon you may come all the just blood that hath
> been shed upon the earth, from the blood of Abel the just, even unto the
> blood of Zacharias the son of Barachias, whom you killed between the
> temple and the altar.
>
> 36 Amen I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation. 37
> Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them
> that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy
> children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou
> wouldest not? 38 Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate. 39 For
> I say to you, you shall not see me henceforth till you say: Blessed is he
> that cometh in the name of the Lord. — Matthew 23
>
>Christ loved sinners and wanted to heal them. But he did not tolerate their
>sins. And if they persisted in those sins they would be damned.
>
> 3 And (Jesus) said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become
> as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. 4
> Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the
> greater in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And he that shall receive one such
> little child in my name, receiveth me.
>
> 6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in
> me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his
> neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe to the
> world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but
> nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh. — Matthew 18
>
>Those who destroy the innocence of children are the scum of the earth. God
>will not forget.

Trans kids need to be protected, just like cisgender kids.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-01-02 10:41 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-01-02, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>> On 2024-01-02 9:10 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-01-02, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-01-01 11:25 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-01-01, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-01-01 12:37 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-01-01, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2023-12-31 4:57 p.m., soup wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 31/12/2023 14:42, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 30, 2023 at 5:46:49 AM UTC-5, Blue Lives Matter
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> …
>>>>>>>>>>> There's a very good reason for a woman to have a condom, Dumbass, but
>>>>>>>>>>> absolutly no reason for a man to have a tampon.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ”Hey Siri!  Give me a phrase that will show us a man who’s never been
>>>>>>>>>> married.”
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Are you insinuating that married men all carry about tampons as their
>>>>>>>>> wives may need them?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   I am married and have never carried a tampon .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've been married since 2009 and have never needed to carry a tampon.
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the leftists our societies keep voting in are influenced
>>>>>>>> too heavily by people with obvious mental illnesses and they're too
>>>>>>>> cowardly to tell them that what they spout is complete bullshit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Their mental illnesses (and their inability to deal logically with them)
>>>>>>> wouldn't be that big of a deal to me if they left children alone and didn't
>>>>>>> try to coerce me into their delusional world. Just because they have
>>>>>>> trouble grasping the obvious doesn't mean they have to include me into their
>>>>>>> idiocy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm a lot more radical than that. If I had tremendous political power,
>>>>>> I'd force these people into state-sponsored mental asylums where they
>>>>>> would be able to live a satisfying life of lobotomies and shock therapy,
>>>>>> whatever will convince men that they aren't women and the inverse. I
>>>>>> have no patience for these people and find them both repulsive and
>>>>>> reprehensible. To me, they are little more than beings possessed by
>>>>>> demons and evidence of the hold Satan has on society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm aware that this will trigger Joel Crump and make him cry as he sucks
>>>>>> his next "girl cock." Nevertheless, I don't give a shit. I have no
>>>>>> tolerance for any modern interpretation of Christianity which suggests
>>>>>> that these demons have a soul too.
>>>>>
>>>>> The insanity gets even more insane. Apparently morons in the state of New
>>>>> South Wales, Australia now want to ban the words "brother" and "sister" in
>>>>> official documents. You can't make up this asininity, it's just too stupid.
>>>>
>>>> However, this is the kind of garbage that the West has voted in. They
>>>> received a ton of warnings that the left had no respect for democracy,
>>>> wanted to push a divide between races, religions and sexes and would
>>>> spend the people's money as if it were their own bank account. However,
>>>> they did not care because those leftist politicians promised them that
>>>> they too would get some free stuff in the form of table scraps.
>>>
>>> We didn't vote this in. Our votes mean nothing, as they make it up as they
>>> go. Until we have paper ballots and real accountability every election can
>>> (and probably will) be stolen. Look what Russia does. Paper ballots in clear
>>> plastic ballot boxes, with a camera focused on each ballot box. Nothing AT
>>> ALL like that in the U.S.
>>
>> Of course not, because such a thing would somehow be racist.
>>
>>>> Honestly, I blame young White women. The moment they enter College,
>>>> their naivety becomes their downfall and they believe every word of what
>>>> their Communist sympathizer professor tells them. They then spend the
>>>> next two decades favouring whichever politician leans most heavily
>>>> toward Marxism. Only once they are 40, alone and miserable do they
>>>> realize that their feminism, atheism and socialism were the causes. A
>>>> woman I've known since she was 12 is the perfect example of this. She
>>>> spent 27 years sleeping around, chasing career and the illusion that
>>>> only Prince Charming was deserving of her cunt. Then, at 39, when she
>>>> realized that everybody around but her was happy with their families and
>>>> husbands, she decided to get herself impregnated by some stranger and
>>>> become a single mother. I'm sure that decision won't come back to bite
>>>> her in her ever-expanding ass.
>>>
>>> Kids don't have anything to anchor to any more. So they float on the tide
>>> and allow themselves to navigate by emotion rather than logic.
>>
>> Which would explain why they're such pussies and obese by the age of 14.
>
> Yep. They're trying to turn girls into shrill, little boys and boys into
> whimpering little sooks. But my son tells me that the newest generation of
> school kids are rebelling against this Woke bullshit. If true, I can
> understand why, the Woke morons have lost all sense of proportion. They keep
> trying to lather on the lying Woke bullshit thicker and thicker. Naturally
> kids will rebel against that. I hope my son has it right. I'm extremely
> happy that none of my kids went to public schools. They missed all their
> brainwashing sessions.

I know that the kids in my school, the smarter ones anyway, rebelled
against it. However, most of them are Muslims so that's to be expected.
I can only hope that they're behaving like that in other classrooms as
well. The dumber kids actually listened to what they had to say, but
probably because none of it sunk in anyway.

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-02 1:14 p.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>
>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>> but celebrated.
>
> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria.

Did you know that most of the time, when people do research into who the
drag queens who want to read the kids are, it turns out that they're
convicted pedophilesY

The "anti-drag hysteria" never ended. I don't want these deviants
talking to my child. If they approach him, they will lose their teeth
and whatever is left of their original gender.

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-02 1:22 p.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>> "issues".
>>
>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>> about tolerating faggots.
>
> Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.
>
> No "Jewish media" has taught me anything. I actually grew up Catholic and in
> grade school we attended Mass every day and had Bible classes every day.
>
> Let's hope the fortune below is correct.

He loved the sinners but there was no doubt as to the fact that they are
_sinners_. If He loved them, it was because He believed that they could
be saved. Much like He cured the blind, He would have removed their
taste for "girl cock."

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-02 3:11 p.m., chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>
>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>> but celebrated.
>>
>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>
> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
> penises and boys can have vaginas?
>
> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>
> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
> always meant, and still do today.

+1

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-02 3:36 p.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>>
>>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>>> but celebrated.
>>>
>>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>>
>> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
>> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
>> penises and boys can have vaginas?
>
> Did you even bother to read the quotation concerning "intersex"?
>
>> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>
> That would be bad, but how often are there "radical leftists" running schools
> in Puritan America? And how often are the parents left out of the equation?

Often, and they call security or the police to escort the parents who
question this stuff out. The obsolete media doesn't showcase this stuff
often, but the actual news, the one you ignore because you're offended
by Trump's tweets or some shit, shows this all the time. It is the exact
same thing here in Canada, Ontario in particular, and Rebel News does a
good job of recording such things.

>> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
>> always meant, and still do today.
>
> Generally the terms are easily applied. In some cases they are not. That's
> simply a biological and social fact.

There are boys and there are girls. That is all. Everything else is a
mental illness.

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-02 4:16 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>>> "issues".
>>>
>>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>>> about tolerating faggots.
>>
>> Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.
>
> He loved them enough to tell them they would go to hell if they didn't
> repent. That's what true love is. "Take up your cross and follow me." Not
> "Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die."
>
> 1 I BESEECH you therefore, brethren, by the mercy of God, that you present
> your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, pleasing unto God, your reasonable
> service. 2 And be not conformed to this world; but be reformed in the
> newness of your mind, that you may prove what is the good, and the
> acceptable, and the perfect will of God. — Romans 12
>
> 6 Whosoever abideth in him, sinneth not; and whosoever sinneth, hath not
> seen him, nor known him. 7 Little children, let no man deceive you. He
> that doth justice is just, even as he is just. 8 He that committeth sin is
> of the devil: for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose,
> the Son of God appeared, that he might destroy the works of the devil. 9
> Whosoever is born of God, committeth not sin: for his seed abideth in him,
> and he can not sin, because he is born of God. 10 In this the children of
> God are manifest, and the children of the devil. Whosoever is not just, is
> not of God, nor he that loveth not his brother. — I John 3
>
> How many times did Jesus say, "Go forth and sin no more?" He loved sinners
> and died to save their souls but if they persist in sin, they will be judged
> guilty.
>
> 31 Wherefore you are witnesses against yourselves, that you are the sons
> of them that killed the prophets. 32 Fill ye up then the measure of your
> fathers. 33 You serpents, generation of vipers, how will you flee from
> the judgment of hell? 34 Therefore behold I send to you prophets, and
> wise men, and scribes: and some of them you will put to death and
> crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from
> city to city: 35 That upon you may come all the just blood that hath
> been shed upon the earth, from the blood of Abel the just, even unto the
> blood of Zacharias the son of Barachias, whom you killed between the
> temple and the altar.
>
> 36 Amen I say to you, all these things shall come upon this generation. 37
> Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them
> that are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered together thy
> children, as the hen doth gather her chickens under her wings, and thou
> wouldest not? 38 Behold, your house shall be left to you, desolate. 39 For
> I say to you, you shall not see me henceforth till you say: Blessed is he
> that cometh in the name of the Lord. — Matthew 23
>
> Christ loved sinners and wanted to heal them. But he did not tolerate their
> sins. And if they persisted in those sins they would be damned.
>
> 3 And (Jesus) said: Amen I say to you, unless you be converted, and become
> as little children, you shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. 4
> Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, he is the
> greater in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And he that shall receive one such
> little child in my name, receiveth me.
>
> 6 But he that shall scandalize one of these little ones that believe in
> me, it were better for him that a millstone should be hanged about his
> neck, and that he should be drowned in the depth of the sea. 7 Woe to the
> world because of scandals. For it must needs be that scandals come: but
> nevertheless woe to that man by whom the scandal cometh. — Matthew 18
>
> Those who destroy the innocence of children are the scum of the earth. God
> will not forget.

It looks like RonB just schooled Chris Ahlstrom on our common religion.

--
@RabidPedagog

RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>On 2024-01-02 1:22 p.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> On 2024-01-02 7:27 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people. As for the "policies", one can always
>>>> find some entity proposing something silly. It's like DFS trolling for Linux
>>>> "issues".
>>>
>>> Contrary to what the Jewish media has taught you, Jesus Christ was not
>>> about tolerating faggots.
>>
>> Actually, Jesus did not tolerate "sinners". He *loved* them.
>>
>> No "Jewish media" has taught me anything. I actually grew up Catholic and in
>> grade school we attended Mass every day and had Bible classes every day.
>>
>> Let's hope the fortune below is correct.
>
>He loved the sinners but there was no doubt as to the fact that they are
>_sinners_. If He loved them, it was because He believed that they could
>be saved. Much like He cured the blind, He would have removed their
>taste for "girl cock."

Jesus says the Father gives the Son of Man (i.e. me) his "seal of
approval". Apparently it's OK for my gay ass to have a trans GF.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-01-03, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
> On 2024-01-02 3:11 p.m., chrisv wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>>
>>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>>> but celebrated.
>>>
>>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>>
>> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
>> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
>> penises and boys can have vaginas?
>>
>> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>>
>> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
>> always meant, and still do today.
>
> +1

David Chappelle has got the Woke up in arms again over his latest special.

'Activists' Infuriated As Dave Chappelle Explains Transgender Position In
New Special

If everyone pretends that the emperor has clothes when he's naked, does
that mean he's not naked? All it takes is one person to point out reality
and break the collectively enabled delusion, so everyone must play along.
Why? Because the delusion makes the emperor feel special and appeases his
entitlement - Anger the emperor and he might make the whole nation
miserable. Just play along, what could it hurt?

The trans movement exists in this kind of bubble, a place where objective
truth is no longer welcome and cognitive dissonance is encouraged for the
sake of comfort. And much like any oppressive environment the more people
self censor to avoid rocking the boat the harder it is for individuals to
speak their minds. This is how consent is manufactured; by creating the
illusion of consensus.

Dave Chappelle is one of the few entertainers in the Hollywood arena
that's willing to point out when the emperor has no clothes, which is why
the political left hates him with a seething passion. Despite their
consistent attempts to cancel his career, Chappelle is back with another
Netflix special called 'The Dreamer.' The comedian opens with guns
blazing on the trans agenda...

[video clip from his special hosted on X (Twitter)]

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1741856584622371024

...infuriating the access media yet again. The accusations are flying
that Chappelle likes to "punch down" which he hilariously mentions in
the special as his favorite comedic pastime.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-dave-chappelle-exposes-collective-delusions-transgenderism-new-special

The last line is the punch line.

--
"Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant,
then it tries to silence good."
-- Archbishop Charles J. Chaput

RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>>I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>
>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>> but celebrated.
>>
>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria.
>
> Yeah because organized drag queen "story hour" doesn't exist. It's all made
> up. Never mind that it isn't as numerous articles clearly show. And forcing
> kids to use Woke bullshit terms like one of the many asinine made up
> "genders" doesn't exist either. Right? If you're that gullible, I've got a
> bridge in Brooklyn you may be interested in buying.
>
> Sorry, Chris but your bullshit "canard" claim is the lying canard pushed by
> the Woke liars when they get caught pushing their crap on kids. Sending your
> kids to public school now is child abuse. Convincing kids to mutilate
> themselves (to "change genders") when they haven't even reached puberty is
> sickening. Actually satanic — destroying childhood innocence. Anyone pushes
> this crap on kids is a vile slimeball.

I invite you to rejoin reality. Sheesh.

--
October.
This is one of the peculiarly dangerous months to speculate in stocks in.
The others are July, January, September, April, November, May, March, June,
December, August, and February.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"

RabidPedagog wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-01-02 4:16 p.m., RonB wrote:
>
> <extensive Bible quotes snipped>
>
>> Those who destroy the innocence of children are the scum of the earth. God
>> will not forget.
>
> It looks like RonB just schooled Chris Ahlstrom on our common religion.

Nah, you can find a verse, with an "interpretation" to "prove" anything you
want, or pick another version of the Bible.

“But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to
get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of
the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Be merciful,
just as your Father is merciful.”

Dueling Bible quotes! A mug's game.

--
So you're back... about time...

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>Did you even bother to read the quotation concerning "intersex"?

"Intersex" has got not one GD thing to do with this issue. Of course
the whackos want to include them in their colition, to muddy the
waters, but, in reality, medical problems are not the issue.

RabidPedagog wrote:

>>> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>>> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>>
>> That would be bad, but how often are there "radical leftists" running schools
>> in Puritan America? And how often are the parents left out of the equation?

It's not "Puritan" in the school system, man. The leftists dominate.
In blue states, it's a friggen landslide. That's a lot of kids.

>Often, and they call security or the police to escort the parents who
>question this stuff out.

Yes, this is a real thing. Another real thing is leftists actually
wanting to make it legal child abuse if parents don't "affirm" their
child's mental problem.

On 2024-01-03 12:24 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-01-03, RabidPedagog <rabid@pedag.og> wrote:
>> On 2024-01-02 3:11 p.m., chrisv wrote:
>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>>>> but celebrated.
>>>>
>>>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria
>>>
>>> What would you call telling little kids that what the doctor "guessed"
>>> they were, at birth, might not be correct? That girls can have
>>> penises and boys can have vaginas?
>>>
>>> How about when the radical leftist running the schools support "social
>>> transitions" at school but won't inform the parents?
>>>
>>> What do the words boy and girl, mean, exactly? I know what they have
>>> always meant, and still do today.
>>
>> +1
>
> David Chappelle has got the Woke up in arms again over his latest special.
>
> 'Activists' Infuriated As Dave Chappelle Explains Transgender Position In
> New Special
>
> If everyone pretends that the emperor has clothes when he's naked, does
> that mean he's not naked? All it takes is one person to point out reality
> and break the collectively enabled delusion, so everyone must play along.
> Why? Because the delusion makes the emperor feel special and appeases his
> entitlement - Anger the emperor and he might make the whole nation
> miserable. Just play along, what could it hurt?
>
> The trans movement exists in this kind of bubble, a place where objective
> truth is no longer welcome and cognitive dissonance is encouraged for the
> sake of comfort. And much like any oppressive environment the more people
> self censor to avoid rocking the boat the harder it is for individuals to
> speak their minds. This is how consent is manufactured; by creating the
> illusion of consensus.
>
> Dave Chappelle is one of the few entertainers in the Hollywood arena
> that's willing to point out when the emperor has no clothes, which is why
> the political left hates him with a seething passion. Despite their
> consistent attempts to cancel his career, Chappelle is back with another
> Netflix special called 'The Dreamer.' The comedian opens with guns
> blazing on the trans agenda...
>
> [video clip from his special hosted on X (Twitter)]
>
> https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1741856584622371024
>
> ...infuriating the access media yet again. The accusations are flying
> that Chappelle likes to "punch down" which he hilariously mentions in
> the special as his favorite comedic pastime.
>
> https://www.zerohedge.com/political/watch-dave-chappelle-exposes-collective-delusions-transgenderism-new-special
>
> The last line is the punch line.

The "critics" who will review either of the specials will state that
they're unfunny or the worst of their careers because of what offended
the faggot community. Meanwhile, much like the screenshot I see on the
article, regular folks will think the specials are awesome. I'm getting
the feeling that most of the world is sick and tired of the sissies as
much as I am. Unfortunately, the people I work with aren't _yet_. I HAVE
noticed that they followed my lead when I told the administration that I
refuse to have propagandists in my classroom. Perhaps they simply needed
someone to speak out.

--
@RabidPedagog

On 2024-01-03 6:46 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> RonB wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On 2024-01-02, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would think that, as a Catholic, you would exhibit some of the spirit of Jesus
>>>>> and his "Golden Rule" for these people.
>>>>
>>>> They are the ones attacking us. They are the ones who want to control
>>>> us. They are the ones who want to indoctrinate our children into
>>>> their sick cult. They are the ones who not only want to be accepted,
>>>> but celebrated.
>>>
>>> Ah, the old "indoctrination" canard. Reminds me of the anti-drag hysteria.
>>
>> Yeah because organized drag queen "story hour" doesn't exist. It's all made
>> up. Never mind that it isn't as numerous articles clearly show. And forcing
>> kids to use Woke bullshit terms like one of the many asinine made up
>> "genders" doesn't exist either. Right? If you're that gullible, I've got a
>> bridge in Brooklyn you may be interested in buying.
>>
>> Sorry, Chris but your bullshit "canard" claim is the lying canard pushed by
>> the Woke liars when they get caught pushing their crap on kids. Sending your
>> kids to public school now is child abuse. Convincing kids to mutilate
>> themselves (to "change genders") when they haven't even reached puberty is
>> sickening. Actually satanic — destroying childhood innocence. Anyone pushes
>> this crap on kids is a vile slimeball.
>
> I invite you to rejoin reality. Sheesh.

Except that everything RonB said there is accurate. I can't imagine what
is prompting you to be so accepting of the rabid homosexuals looking to
normalize pedophilia and self-mutilation, but I hope your Catholic
education will eventually kick in and cause you to refuse the
indoctrination.

--
@RabidPedagog