On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly mistakenly,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> include the drivers of crime, such as poverty, inequality
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and high unemployment, in the figures and see how that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sector is represented among that part of the population
>>>>>>>>>>>>> affected by those. Statistics that don't include those can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit prisons
>>>>>>>>>>>> from the likes of gun crime disproportionately, why not
>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many studies
>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned to show the correlation of the two without an
>>>>>>>>>>>> ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because it's an
>>>>>>>>>>>> established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality and
>>>>>>>>>>> high unemployment are proven factors in why people commit
>>>>>>>>>>> crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types of crime
>>>>>>>>>>> they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity, aka
>>>>>>>>>> culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race, but
>>>>>>>> agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly carried
>>>>>>>> out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated that
>>>>>>> there is insufficient data to break down the incidence of gun
>>>>>>> crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If they can't
>>>>>>> say whether gun crime is predominantly the preserve of one
>>>>>>> particular ethnic group, I am not going to speculate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>
>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091 men
>>>>>> and boys who police took action against for a range of violent and
>>>>>> sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes, 54
>>>>>> per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun crimes,
>>>>>> 67 per cent."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is not
>>>>> recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the police
>>>>> recognise when the sample space is too small to produce any
>>>>> meaningful data.
>>>>
>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>
>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>
>> *if*?
>>
>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>
> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
> things that might help the police.
>
>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?

Your position is puzzling.

Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint (or
worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator was white
or black?

Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:38:53 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 13:24, Jack Harry Teesdale wrote:
>>>> The majority of people who are 'poor and unemployed' do not resort to
>>>> crime, this is a myth perpetuated by sociologists. It is just that
>>>> certain cultures are more predisposed to crime.
>>>
>>> What cultures lead to the street gangs of 19th century London, or the
>>> Tongs of mid-20th century Glasgow?
>>>
>>
>> The cultures that existed in those cities at the time, of course.
>
> Non-indigenous non-white 'culltures' that had no business being there
> in the first place.
>
> #gookejershito
>
Mangina, it is immoral for you to call me a gook.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.

Michael

Colin Bignell wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>
>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>
>> *if*?
>>
>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>
> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
> things that might help the police.

Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.

One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/chicago-three-big-reasons-why-murder-city-usa-is-so-unsafe/#comment-2836333

I’ll give you three reasons, having lived there until I joined the Army:
1. The city “government” is as corrupt as any you’ll find in the third
world. Members of the city council are in bed with the major gangs.
2. The police department is as corrupt as the “government”, considering
itself wholly outside the law. Until relatively recently, there was a
home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating INSIDE the most
“elite” unit in the department.
3. The population obviously LIKES these things, since they’ve been
voting for them since before my grandmother moved there from Nashville…
BEFORE WWI.

Black Chicagoans elected and reelected Richard M. Daley for something
like twenty+ years, DESPITE the fact that he profited politically from
an organized torture ring operating INSIDE the Chicago PD. Most of the
known victims of said ring were NOT Norwegian…

Chicago is what it is because the Chicagoans WANT it that way. Sucks to
be them.

On 24/07/2023 17:53, JNugent wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakenly, to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include the drivers of crime, such as poverty, inequality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and high unemployment, in the figures and see how that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sector is represented among that part of the population
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affected by those. Statistics that don't include those can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit prisons
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the likes of gun crime disproportionately, why not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many studies
>>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned to show the correlation of the two without an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because it's an
>>>>>>>>>>>>> established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality and
>>>>>>>>>>>> high unemployment are proven factors in why people commit
>>>>>>>>>>>> crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types of crime
>>>>>>>>>>>> they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity, aka
>>>>>>>>>>> culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race,
>>>>>>>>> but agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly
>>>>>>>>> carried out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated
>>>>>>>> that there is insufficient data to break down the incidence of
>>>>>>>> gun crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If they
>>>>>>>> can't say whether gun crime is predominantly the preserve of one
>>>>>>>> particular ethnic group, I am not going to speculate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091
>>>>>>> men and boys who police took action against for a range of
>>>>>>> violent and sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes,
>>>>>>> 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun
>>>>>>> crimes, 67 per cent."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is not
>>>>>> recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the police
>>>>>> recognise when the sample space is too small to produce any
>>>>>> meaningful data.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>
>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>
>>> *if*?
>>>
>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>
>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
>> things that might help the police.
>>
>>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?
>
> Your position is puzzling.
>
> Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint (or
> worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator was white
> or black?
>
> Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?
>

There have been many studies carried out to determine the accuracy of
recall of witnesses to events and they all concluded that their memory
is unreliable at the best of times. Studies of people subject to violent
episodes, both as a result of crime and of conflict, show that their
short term memory is affected and they may even suffer complete amnesia
of the event. In general, dominant and extrovert personalities are the
least likely to be affected, while submissive and introvert
personalities are the most likely to be affected. So, even if they do
see whether their attacker is black or white, some may be completely
unable to recall that after the event. Their mind is shielding them from
the trauma.

--
Colin Bignell

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:33:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Colin Bignell wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>
>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>
>>> *if*?
>>>
>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>
>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
>> things that might help the police.
>
> Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.

As if that's going to help them.

> One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
>about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.

Who giives a shit what the dumb ape wrote, gook? He was part of the
problem.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:30:38 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 08:38:53 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 13:24, Jack Harry Teesdale wrote:
>>>>> The majority of people who are 'poor and unemployed' do not resort to
>>>>> crime, this is a myth perpetuated by sociologists. It is just that
>>>>> certain cultures are more predisposed to crime.
>>>>
>>>> What cultures lead to the street gangs of 19th century London, or the
>>>> Tongs of mid-20th century Glasgow?
>>>>
>>>
>>> The cultures that existed in those cities at the time, of course.
>>
>> Non-indigenous non-white 'culltures' that had no business being there
>> in the first place.
>>
>> #gookejershito
>>
> Mangina, it is immoral for you to call me a gook.

Needledick, it is unrealistic for you to object to being called a
gook. You ARE a gook.

> You are a Nazi.

You are a gook,

> As a Nazi, you are, above all else

As a craven gook who zsuckles jew ani, you are, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAY below
all else.

#gookejershito

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:38:10 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN spamming as NoSpamAtAll (LOL) <spamnot@not.home> spammed from
STD.COM:

<jew spam b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

POLISH escorts ALSO in KUWAIT... they LOVE sucking MUZZIE dick!

https://massagerepublic.com/female-escorts-in-kuwait/best4u-polish

Services:Anal Sex, BDSM, CIM - Come In Mouth...

SHEEEEESH!

"In recent years the public discourses on Polish migration in the UK have rapidly turned hostile"... WHAAA!

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1451308

SIMPLE SOLUTION!

London --------------------- LO286 ----------------------> Warsaw

LOLOK!

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:33:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>
>>>> *if*?
>>>>
>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>
>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
>>> things that might help the police.
>>
>> Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>
> As if that's going to help them.
If they survive, that helps them.

>
>> One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
>> about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>
> Who giives a shit what the dumb ape wrote, gook? He was part of the
> problem.
>

Nithing, there is nothing ape about Chris, and he never murdered
anyone.

He greatly influenced my own political views since April 26, 1996!

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

The polack-muzzie war in London... GOOD LUCK TO BOTH SIDES!

BTW... "two drunk Polish men"... as if there were NON-drunk Polish men!

"A Muslim mother and her young daughter were racially abused and taunted with
Islamophobic abuse on a London bus by two drunk Polish men.

The incident occurred on the afternoon of June 19."

https://tellmamauk.org/muslim-family-repeatedly-called-the-n-word-and-suicide-bomber-on-london-bus/

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 19:28:16 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:08:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:33:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>>
>>>>> *if*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>>
>>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>>>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>>>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
>>>> things that might help the police.
>>>
>>> Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>
>> As if that's going to help them.
> If they survive, that helps them.

How does it help them? They're only going to become beneficaries of
the NEXT incident.

>>
>>> One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
>>> about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>
>> Who giives a shit what the dumb ape wrote, gook? He was part of the
>> problem.
>>
>
> Nithing, there is nothing ape about Chris, and he never murdered
>anyone.

Needledick, you can adore and worship the ape all you like, he is and
was part of the problem simply by being black.

> He greatly influenced my own political views since April 26, 1996!

Your BLANK Oriental MIND will ALWAYS be greatly influenced by the last
person you speak with, for nature abhors a vacuum.

> You are a nithing

You are a gook.

#gookejershito

Sick PAEDO PRIESTS! Retired priest in UK sentenced to 9 1/2 years for sex abuse (338)

TSSHK!

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-uk-and-ireland/2019/03/retired-priest-in-uk-sentenced-to-9-1-2-years-for-sex-abuse/

"Other victims - both male and female"

WHAT!?

https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/priest-jailed-for-theft-1-190057

Priest jailed for theft
Father Eric Woodhead at Lowestoft magisistrates' court - Stealing from
parishioners at Our lady Star of the Sea Church in Lowestoft

A RESPECTED Roman Catholic priest has been jailed after he set up a secret
bank account and stole almost #100,000 which was left to his church in a will.

On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:53:19 +0100, jB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
wrote:

>
>
>Has somebody stopped taking their meds, perhaps?

Is that you again, jewboi? I thought you'd disappeared.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:01:51 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged fr0oom STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:00:41 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

In article <2intbi9knkcqhfoebhogi01n86tu993cj7@4ax.com>,
Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells <disgusted@tunbridge.wells> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:53:19 +0100, jB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Has somebody stopped taking their meds, perhaps?
>
>Is that you again, jewboi? I thought you'd disappeared.

Sick PAEDO PRIESTS! They went as far as LIMPOPO to find kiddies to rape! LOMPO! (338)

https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2018-10-09-watch--limpopo-man-alleges-uk-priest-sexually-assaulted-and-raped-him-as-a-teen/

A Limpopo man has come forward to allege sexual assault and rape by a UK Catholic
priest, and the complicity of the church in blocking his demands for justice.

Sick PAEDO PRIESTS! Polish Catholic priests rape kiddies! (338)

https://www.ft.com/content/b38f994c-8dc2-11e9-a24d-b42f641eca37

TSSSK!

https://www.dw.com/en/pope-francis-there-is-corruption-in-the-vatican/a-51431279

Pope Francis admitted there is financial corruption in the Vatican,
describing it as a "scandal" on Tuesday. The pope's statement marked
the first time he has acknowledged corruption in Vatican finances.

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:08:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:33:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>>
>>> As if that's going to help them.
>> If they survive, that helps them.
>
> How does it help them? They're only going to become beneficaries of
> the NEXT incident.
They survived.

The series Surviving Evil features stories of people who survived
violent crime.
>
>>>
>>>> One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
>>>> about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>>
>>> Who giives a shit what the dumb ape wrote, gook? He was part of the
>>> problem.
>>>
>>
>> Nithing, there is nothing ape about Chris, and he never murdered
>> anyone.
>
> Needledick, you can adore and worship the ape all you like
It is immoral for you to call Chris an ape or a gook.

I can understand why people would be tempted to worship him. But I
remember there is only one Perfect Man, and we nailed Him to a cross.
, he is and
> was part of the problem simply by being black.
Skin color is a superficial characteristic.

>
>> He greatly influenced my own political views since April 26, 1996!
>
> Your BLANK Oriental MIND will ALWAYS be greatly influenced by the last
> person you speak with, for nature abhors a vacuum.
There is nothing blank about my mind.

>
>> You are a nithing
>
> You are a gook.
>
> #gookejershito
>
It is immoral for you to call me an ape or a gook.

It is immoral for you to call anyone apes or gooks.

The following article explains your pathology.

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48027056

neo-Nazi who suggested Prince Harry should be shot for marrying a woman of
mixed race has pleaded guilty to terror offences at the Old Bailey.

Szewczuk, hiding behind a pseudonym, also used a separate account to posts
links to self-authored diatribes that called for the "systematic slaughtering"
of women and the rape of babies.

</quote>

HUH?

"Michal Szewczuk"?

Read this, you dumb inferior bastard:

"Es muss auch der letzten Kuhmagd in Deutschland klargemacht werden,
dass das Polentum gleichwertig ist mit Untermenschentum."

A Nazi, you want to be? LOLOK!

On 24/07/2023 18:33, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> Colin Bignell wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>
>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>
>>> *if*?
>>>
>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>
>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to recall
>> things that might help the police.
>
>    Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>
>    One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
> about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>
>
> https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/chicago-three-big-reasons-why-murder-city-usa-is-so-unsafe/#comment-2836333
>
>
> I’ll give you three reasons, having lived there until I joined the Army:
> 1. The city “government” is as corrupt as any you’ll find in the third
> world. Members of the city council are in bed with the major gangs.
> 2. The police department is as corrupt as the “government”, considering
> itself wholly outside the law. Until relatively recently, there was a
> home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating INSIDE the most
> “elite” unit in the department.
> 3. The population obviously LIKES these things, since they’ve been
> voting for them since before my grandmother moved there from Nashville…
> BEFORE WWI.
>
> Black Chicagoans elected and reelected Richard M. Daley for something
> like twenty+ years, DESPITE the fact that he profited politically from
> an organized torture ring operating INSIDE the Chicago PD. Most of the
> known victims of said ring were NOT Norwegian…
>
> Chicago is what it is because the Chicagoans WANT it that way. Sucks to
> be them.
>
>
>
It's coming to London as we speak.

--
Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do!