The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 18:33, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>> *if*?
>>>>
>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>
>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to
>>> recall things that might help the police.
>>
>>     Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>
>>     One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton,
>> wrote about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>
>>
>> https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/chicago-three-big-reasons-why-murder-city-usa-is-so-unsafe/#comment-2836333
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ll give you three reasons, having lived there until I joined the Army:
>> 1. The city “government” is as corrupt as any you’ll find in the third
>> world. Members of the city council are in bed with the major gangs.
>> 2. The police department is as corrupt as the “government”,
>> considering itself wholly outside the law. Until relatively recently,
>> there was a home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating
>> INSIDE the most “elite” unit in the department.
>> 3. The population obviously LIKES these things, since they’ve been
>> voting for them since before my grandmother moved there from
>> Nashville… BEFORE WWI.
>>
>> Black Chicagoans elected and reelected Richard M. Daley for something
>> like twenty+ years, DESPITE the fact that he profited politically from
>> an organized torture ring operating INSIDE the Chicago PD. Most of the
>> known victims of said ring were NOT Norwegian…
>>
>> Chicago is what it is because the Chicagoans WANT it that way. Sucks
>> to be them.
>>
>>
>>
> It's coming to London as we speak.
>
>
How do you deduce that?

Is there probable cause to believe that more corruption is coming?

Michael

On 24/07/2023 07:07 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 17:53, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakenly, to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include the drivers of crime, such as poverty, inequality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and high unemployment, in the figures and see how that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sector is represented among that part of the population
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affected by those. Statistics that don't include those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit prisons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the likes of gun crime disproportionately, why not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many studies
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commissioned to show the correlation of the two without an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because it's an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> high unemployment are proven factors in why people commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types of crime
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity, aka
>>>>>>>>>>>> culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race,
>>>>>>>>>> but agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly
>>>>>>>>>> carried out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated
>>>>>>>>> that there is insufficient data to break down the incidence of
>>>>>>>>> gun crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If they
>>>>>>>>> can't say whether gun crime is predominantly the preserve of
>>>>>>>>> one particular ethnic group, I am not going to speculate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091
>>>>>>>> men and boys who police took action against for a range of
>>>>>>>> violent and sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes,
>>>>>>>> 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun
>>>>>>>> crimes, 67 per cent."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is
>>>>>>> not recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the
>>>>>>> police recognise when the sample space is too small to produce
>>>>>>> any meaningful data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity of
>>>>>> the criminals, can they?
>>>>>
>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>
>>>> *if*?
>>>>
>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>
>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However, the
>>> main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as well as
>>> probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying to
>>> recall things that might help the police.
>>>
>>>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?
>>
>> Your position is puzzling.
>>
>> Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint (or
>> worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator was
>> white or black?
>>
>> Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?
>>
>
> There have been many studies carried out to determine the accuracy of
> recall of witnesses to events and they all concluded that their memory
> is unreliable at the best of times. Studies of people subject to violent
> episodes, both as a result of crime and of conflict, show that their
> short term memory is affected and they may even suffer complete amnesia
> of the event. In general, dominant and extrovert personalities are the
> least likely to be affected, while submissive and introvert
> personalities are the most likely to be affected. So, even if they do
> see whether their attacker is black or white, some may be completely
> unable to recall that after the event. Their mind is shielding them from
> the trauma.

My apologies... SOME Poles in London ARE hard-working!

https://kommons.com/london/polish-nationality.html

LOLOK!

Check out the 40 quid one!

On 25/07/2023 16:45, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 18:33, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> *if*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>>
>>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However,
>>>> the main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as
>>>> well as probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying
>>>> to recall things that might help the police.
>>>
>>>     Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>>
>>>     One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton,
>>> wrote about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/chicago-three-big-reasons-why-murder-city-usa-is-so-unsafe/#comment-2836333
>>>
>>>
>>> I’ll give you three reasons, having lived there until I joined the Army:
>>> 1. The city “government” is as corrupt as any you’ll find in the
>>> third world. Members of the city council are in bed with the major
>>> gangs.
>>> 2. The police department is as corrupt as the “government”,
>>> considering itself wholly outside the law. Until relatively recently,
>>> there was a home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring operating
>>> INSIDE the most “elite” unit in the department.
>>> 3. The population obviously LIKES these things, since they’ve been
>>> voting for them since before my grandmother moved there from
>>> Nashville… BEFORE WWI.
>>>
>>> Black Chicagoans elected and reelected Richard M. Daley for something
>>> like twenty+ years, DESPITE the fact that he profited politically
>>> from an organized torture ring operating INSIDE the Chicago PD. Most
>>> of the known victims of said ring were NOT Norwegian…
>>>
>>> Chicago is what it is because the Chicagoans WANT it that way. Sucks
>>> to be them.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It's coming to London as we speak.
>>
>>
>    How do you deduce that?
>
>    Is there probable cause to believe that more corruption is coming?
>
>
Yes. Sadiq Khan is bent as a five bob note and Ulez income is all going
into his chums pockets

>  Michael

--
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

The corruption of the Vatican

The most corrupt nation state in Western Europe occupies only 120 acres of land
and has fewer than 1,000 residents. But its capacity for initiating criminal
behaviour, and the global consequences of the financial and sexual scandals
in which it’s entangled, are hugely out of proportion to its size.

That’s because, around the world, roughly a billion people traditionally regard
the state’s geriatric absolute monarch as God’s representative on earth. They
may have been aware that, for centuries, a few bad apples in the administration
have betrayed the monarch’s trust by embezzling money. But the notion that the
whole state was slowly turning into a criminal enterprise would have struck them
as ridiculous, even sacrilegious.

Until now.

We're talking about Vatican City, of course.

Read more! https://unherd.com/2021/08/the-corruption-of-the-vatican/

The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 16:45, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 18:33, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>>     Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>>>
>>>>     One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton,
>>>> wrote about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/chicago-three-big-reasons-why-murder-city-usa-is-so-unsafe/#comment-2836333
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I’ll give you three reasons, having lived there until I joined the
>>>> Army:
>>>> 1. The city “government” is as corrupt as any you’ll find in the
>>>> third world. Members of the city council are in bed with the major
>>>> gangs.
>>>> 2. The police department is as corrupt as the “government”,
>>>> considering itself wholly outside the law. Until relatively
>>>> recently, there was a home invasion, burglary and kidnapping ring
>>>> operating INSIDE the most “elite” unit in the department.
>>>> 3. The population obviously LIKES these things, since they’ve been
>>>> voting for them since before my grandmother moved there from
>>>> Nashville… BEFORE WWI.
>>>>
>>>> Black Chicagoans elected and reelected Richard M. Daley for
>>>> something like twenty+ years, DESPITE the fact that he profited
>>>> politically from an organized torture ring operating INSIDE the
>>>> Chicago PD. Most of the known victims of said ring were NOT Norwegian…
>>>>
>>>> Chicago is what it is because the Chicagoans WANT it that way. Sucks
>>>> to be them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It's coming to London as we speak.
>>>
>>>
>>     How do you deduce that?
>>
>>     Is there probable cause to believe that more corruption is coming?
>>
>>
> Yes. Sadiq Khan is bent as a five bob note and Ulez income is all going
> into his chums pockets
>
What evidence do you have that would give people a reason to take a
closer look?

Michael

On 25/07/2023 16:47, JNugent wrote:
> On 24/07/2023 07:07 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 17:53, JNugent wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakenly, to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include the drivers of crime, such as poverty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inequality and high unemployment, in the figures and see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> how that sector is represented among that part of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> population affected by those. Statistics that don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include those can and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit prisons
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the likes of gun crime disproportionately, why not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> studies commissioned to show the correlation of the two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's an established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> high unemployment are proven factors in why people commit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types of crime
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> aka culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race,
>>>>>>>>>>> but agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly
>>>>>>>>>>> carried out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated
>>>>>>>>>> that there is insufficient data to break down the incidence of
>>>>>>>>>> gun crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If they
>>>>>>>>>> can't say whether gun crime is predominantly the preserve of
>>>>>>>>>> one particular ethnic group, I am not going to speculate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091
>>>>>>>>> men and boys who police took action against for a range of
>>>>>>>>> violent and sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street crimes,
>>>>>>>>> 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and for gun
>>>>>>>>> crimes, 67 per cent."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is
>>>>>>>> not recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the
>>>>>>>> police recognise when the sample space is too small to produce
>>>>>>>> any meaningful data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity
>>>>>>> of the criminals, can they?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>>
>>>>> *if*?
>>>>>
>>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>>
>>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However,
>>>> the main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as
>>>> well as probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on trying
>>>> to recall things that might help the police.
>>>>
>>>>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?
>>>
>>> Your position is puzzling.
>>>
>>> Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint
>>> (or worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator
>>> was white or black?
>>>
>>> Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?
>>>
>>
>> There have been many studies carried out to determine the accuracy of
>> recall of witnesses to events and they all concluded that their memory
>> is unreliable at the best of times. Studies of people subject to
>> violent episodes, both as a result of crime and of conflict, show that
>> their short term memory is affected and they may even suffer complete
>> amnesia of the event. In general, dominant and extrovert personalities
>> are the least likely to be affected, while submissive and introvert
>> personalities are the most likely to be affected. So, even if they do
>> see whether their attacker is black or white, some may be completely
>> unable to recall that after the event. Their mind is shielding them
>> from the trauma.
>
> Any actual data?
>
> Or just those vague aspersions, blaming the victims (and witnesses)?

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:13:39 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 14:49:23 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:08:05 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:33:50 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>>>> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Likely because the victiums are trying to avoid getting shot.
>>>>
>>>> As if that's going to help them.
>>> If they survive, that helps them.
>>
>> How does it help them? They're only going to become beneficaries of
>> the NEXT incident.
> They survived.

They won't survive the next one.

> The series Surviving Evil features stories of people who survived
>violent crime.

Who gives two warm jew shits, gook?

>>>>
>>>>> One of my longtime Usenet allies, Christopher Charles Morton, wrote
>>>>> about the culture in Chicago in August of 2016.
>>>>
>>>> Who giives a shit what the dumb ape wrote, gook? He was part of the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nithing, there is nothing ape about Chris, and he never murdered
>>> anyone.
>>
>> Needledick, you can adore and worship the ape all you like
> It is immoral for you to call Chris an ape or a gook.

What your friend Chrissie Morton needs is a 2 am traffic stop (K-9
optional) somewhere like rural Mississippi. "Y'all keep yor filthy
nigger hands where I can see them, BOY!" Net result: one less
nigger.

> I can understand why people would be tempted to worship him. But I
>remember there is only one Perfect Man, and we nailed Him to a cross.
>, he is and
>> was part of the problem simply by being black.
> Skin color is a superficial characteristic.

Skin colour is the DOMINANT characteristic: it determines ALL OTHERS.

>>
>>> He greatly influenced my own political views since April 26, 1996!
>>
>> Your BLANK Oriental MIND will ALWAYS be greatly influenced by the last
>> person you speak with, for nature abhors a vacuum.
> There is nothing blank about my mind.

Your mind is like TOTALLY BLANK, gook. One only has to look at your
Instagram pics: the same gormless BLANK minded expression in every
fucking one!

>>
>>> You are a nithing
>>
>> You are a gook.
>>
>> #gookejershito
>>
> It is immoral for you to call me an ape or a gook.

It is unrealistic for apes or gooks to object to being called apes or
gooks.

> It is immoral for you to call anyone apes or gooks.

See above.

> The following article explains your pathology.
>
>
>
>
>http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

Zsuckling jew ani explains YOURS, gook.

>
> History's oldest hatred
> By Jeff Jacoby

History's oldest REASON for hatred: jew behaviour.

On Tue, 25 Jul 2023 18:58:16 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRRY
ZACHARY SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:35:42 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN spamming as Andrzej rapes kiddies <fsturluogh5@gmail.com>
spammed from STD.COM:

<jew spam b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:36:12 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

Sick PAEDO PRIESTS! Retired priest in UK sentenced to 9 1/2 years for sex abuse (338)

TSSHK!

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-uk-and-ireland/2019/03/retired-priest-in-uk-sentenced-to-9-1-2-years-for-sex-abuse/

"Other victims - both male and female"

WHAT!?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:36:50 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:38:06 +0000 (UTC), jew paedophile BARRY ZACHARY
SHEIN forging as Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells
<disgusted@tunbridge.wells> forged from STD.COM:

<jew forgery b'rissed>

Fuck orf, jewboi.

Bishop claims that child victims are partly to blame in priest sex-abuse cases

https://www.thetablet.co.uk/news/11740/more-priests-arrested-on-abuse-charges-in-us

One-third of child sex abuse in Poland is committed by priests

https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/one-third-of-child-sex-abuse-in-poland-is-committed-by-priests/14732

SHOOSH!

Such FILTHY PAEDO PRIESTS innit!

On 26/07/2023 09:32 am, Colin Bignell wrote:
> On 25/07/2023 16:47, JNugent wrote:
>> On 24/07/2023 07:07 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>> On 24/07/2023 17:53, JNugent wrote:
>>>> On 24/07/2023 05:39 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>> On 24/07/2023 16:48, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 04:19 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 14:54, JNugent wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 12:10 pm, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 11:18, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:35, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 09:25, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:36, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 24/07/2023 08:13, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 14:08, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 12:09, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 10:46, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/07/2023 07:34, Fredxx wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:39, Colin Bignell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/07/2023 23:13, Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As Mark Twain wrote, attributing it, possibly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mistakenly, to Disraeli:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only if you don't like the numbers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The article is 13 years old, but I doubt much has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, that does not look into the reasons why a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> particular sector of the population is over-represented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> compared to the general population. For that you need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to include the drivers of crime, such as poverty,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inequality and high unemployment, in the figures and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see how that sector is represented among that part of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the population affected by those. Statistics that don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> include those can and probably do lie.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Given that other ethnic minorities do not inhabit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prisons from the likes of gun crime disproportionately,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why not simply put it down to culture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it was purely down to say whether a criminal received
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> free school dinners as a child there would be many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> studies commissioned to show the correlation of the two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an ethnic bias. But there aren't, simply because
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's an established fact that is criminality is cultural.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is far too simplistic a view. Poverty, inequality
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and high unemployment are proven factors in why people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> commit crime. Culture is only proven to affect the types
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of crime they commit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that an admission that it is predominantly ethnicity,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aka culture, that determines the likelihood of criminality?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is, in fact, the exact opposite.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So your saying the quantity of crime is independent on race,
>>>>>>>>>>>> but agree for example, white collar crime is predominantly
>>>>>>>>>>>> carried out by Caucasian and gun crime predominantly by blacks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In response to a FOI request, the Metropolitan Police stated
>>>>>>>>>>> that there is insufficient data to break down the incidence
>>>>>>>>>>> of gun crime by ethnicity, even over a ten year period. If
>>>>>>>>>>> they can't say whether gun crime is predominantly the
>>>>>>>>>>> preserve of one particular ethnic group, I am not going to
>>>>>>>>>>> speculate.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is the Telegraph making this up?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have no idea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   "The data provide a breakdown of the ethnicity of the 18,091
>>>>>>>>>> men and boys who police took action against for a range of
>>>>>>>>>> violent and sexual offences in London in 2009-10.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> They show that among those proceeded against for street
>>>>>>>>>> crimes, 54 per cent were black; for robbery, 59 per cent; and
>>>>>>>>>> for gun crimes, 67 per cent."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps, like yourself, the Metropolitan Police are fearful of
>>>>>>>>>> making any meaningful comment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gun and knife crime in the Met account for around 2% of violent
>>>>>>>>> crimes, the majority of those are knife crime and ethnicity is
>>>>>>>>> not recorded in all cases. Perhaps, unlike a journalist, the
>>>>>>>>> police recognise when the sample space is too small to produce
>>>>>>>>> any meaningful data.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the victims and witnesses can never recognise the ethnicity
>>>>>>>> of the criminals, can they?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even if the do, there is no guarantee that information will be
>>>>>>> recorded against the crime in the statistics.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *if*?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are they all dressed up in SAS attire?
>>>>>
>>>>> A hoodie with a scarf over the face seems more probable. However,
>>>>> the main problem is that witnesses are notoriously unreliable. as
>>>>> well as probably being far more fixated on the weapon than on
>>>>> trying to recall things that might help the police.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Wouldn't that make them a bit easy to spot?
>>>>
>>>> Your position is puzzling.
>>>>
>>>> Are you seriously saying that when someone is robbed at knifepoint
>>>> (or worse) in the street, they cannot tell whether the perpetrator
>>>> was white or black?
>>>>
>>>> Or is it perhaps that they cannot be trusted to be truthful over it?
>>>>
>>>
>>> There have been many studies carried out to determine the accuracy of
>>> recall of witnesses to events and they all concluded that their
>>> memory is unreliable at the best of times. Studies of people subject
>>> to violent episodes, both as a result of crime and of conflict, show
>>> that their short term memory is affected and they may even suffer
>>> complete amnesia of the event. In general, dominant and extrovert
>>> personalities are the least likely to be affected, while submissive
>>> and introvert personalities are the most likely to be affected. So,
>>> even if they do see whether their attacker is black or white, some
>>> may be completely unable to recall that after the event. Their mind
>>> is shielding them from the trauma.
>>
>> Any actual data?
>>
>> Or just those vague aspersions, blaming the victims (and witnesses)?
>
> Some of the main works on the subject:
>
> Eye witnesses in general:
>
> Clifford B. R., & Scott J. (1978). Individual and situational factors in
> eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 352–359.
>
> Clifford B. R., & Hollin C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident
> and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied
> Psychology, 66, 364–370.
>
> Milne R., & Bull R. (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and
> practice. (Wiley)
>
> Effects of personality on eye witness testimony:
>
> Ward R. A., & Loftus E. F. (1985). Eyewitness performance in different
> psychological types. The Journal of General Psychology, 112, 191–200.
>
> Liebman J. I., McKinley-Pace M. J., Leonard A.M., Sheesley L. A.,
> Gallant C. L., Renkey M. E., & Lehman E. B. (2002). Cognitive and
> psychological correlates of adult's eyewitness accuracy and
> suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 49–66.
>
> Andersen S. M., Carlson C. A., Carlson M. A., & Gronlund S. D. (2014).
> Individual differences predict eyewitness identification performance.
> Personality and Individual Differences, 60, 36–40
>
> Pires R., Silva D. R., & Ferreira A. S. (2013). Personality styles and
> suggestibility: A differential approach. Personality and Individual
> Differences, 55, 381–386.

Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells wrote:
> One-third of child sex abuse in Poland is committed by priests
>
> https://international.la-croix.com/news/religion/one-third-of-child-sex-abuse-in-poland-is-committed-by-priests/14732
>
> SHOOSH!
>
> Such FILTHY PAEDO PRIESTS innit!
>
If such a thing happened in Poland's Jewish community, it would be a
major scandal!

Michael

Peeler wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
> again:
>
>> Statistics don't lie:
>>
>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>
> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi head, you
> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>
He is just jealous of me and Chris!

Michael

On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
> Peeler wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>> gay
>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>> again:
>>
>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>
>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>
>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>> head, you
>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>
> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>
>
> Michael

Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
lower on the social ladder is a jew.

On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 10:36:33 AM UTC-4, Peeler wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 14:45:01 +0100, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
> bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
> sexual cripple, making a total ass of herself as "Disgusted of Tunbridge
> Wells", farted again:
> > <jew spam b'rissed>
> >
> > Fuck orf, jewboi.
> I'm afraid

Everyone already knew that, you cowardly worm.

Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
> On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> Peeler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>>> gay
>>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>>> again:
>>>
>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>
>>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>>
>>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>>> head, you
>>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>>
>> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>>
>>
>> Michael
>
> Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
> lower on the social ladder is a jew.
>
They are all better than you!

Michael

On Fri, 28 Jul 2023 00:08:19 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg wrote:
>> On 7/27/2023 12:05 PM, Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> Peeler wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
>>>> gay
>>>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>>>> again:
>>>>
>>>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi
>>>> head, you
>>>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>>>
>>> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>>>
>>>
>>> Michael
>>
>> Why would anyone be jealous of a gook and a spook? The only thing
>> lower on the social ladder is a jew.
>>
> They are all better than you!
>
>
> Michael

They are genitally mutilated semitic ragheads...they are not even
better than YOU, gook!

#gookejershito

--

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."

On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:05:30 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>Peeler wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jul 23 22:13:36 UTC, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married gay
>> neo-nazitard, now STRUTTING around as Carolyn Jean Swikard Berg, whined
>> again:
>>
>>> Statistics don't lie:
>>>
>>> https://niggermania.club/tom/newstuff/london%20nigger%20crimes.jpg
>>
>> Forever unable to get your superiors out of your sick gay neo-nazi head, you
>> abysmally stupid ridiculous gay neo-nazitard? LOL
>>
> He is just jealous of me and Chris!
>
>
> Michael

Nu HUMAN has ever been jealous of a slant eyed mongoloid with a BLANK
mind or his coon ape lover.

--

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus admits he got
no life AT ALL outside stalking on THE Usenet!
"Frankly, if he were gone, I wouldn't know what to do here."
Message-ID: <FCOQt.107901$hp7.96925@fx13.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus, defending his fellow
Grik sodomite the Grikboxer® and under the delusion that he's
been able to grow a pair: "You'd have to get past me first,"
Message-ID: <LOOQt.337647$Qr2.32934@fx08.fr7>

Yet more proof that the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
thinks he got a pair: "Just to let you know: ANYONE who "befriends"
the subnormal swine will have to deal with me! Get ready, bitch!"
Message-ID: <FHg6t.166438$Nl5.48106@newsfe07.iad>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus STILL seems to think
he got a pair: "Which will NEVER happen! You'd have to get past
me first, poor psycho! LOL"
Message-ID: <MCSIu.1$c56.0@fx32.fr7>

The Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus having still MORE delusions
about growing a pair: "If ANYONE dared to grab me by the neck
like that he'd get my fist in his face."
Message-ID: <qeilfu$iog$1@gioia.aioe.org>

In spite of all the evidence, the Illiterate Foreskin Peeling Grik anus
STILL has delusions about growing a pair!
"What kind of other-worldly pussies (men?) are you all? If someone
would dare to grab me by the back of my neck like that and push me
around, my instinctive, AUTOMATIC reaction would be to knock him in
the face! NOBODY is allowed to do that to ANYONE!"
Message-ID: <qfnPE.73303$YG3.18805@usenetxs.com>

Best of all! From the Foreskin Peeler's doctoral dissertation in divinity,
'University' of Salonica (1992): "The jew g-d is your g-d's dad."